- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Finding a common ancestor on both sides when doing ancestry
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:09 am
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:09 am
Six degrees of separation exists for living people, I never once considered genetically.
My nanny asked that I spend a little time piecing together everyone's names and history. After going back a very long ways, I find a guy who appears on both sides of her mother's family tree.
So basically, her mother's grandmother's ---great great great great grandfather
...and her mother's father's --- great great great grandfather.
Were the same person.
I tell my wife, and her response is immediately "that's disgusting"
But after viewing the family tree blown up... I don't really see how they could have kept track of it. Separated by at least 120 miles and 5 generations, neither had a last name that had been linked again in 5 generations.
At this point, I bet my wife, who is from 2000 miles away, we have a common ancestor. Seven generations back, there it is. I pick a random dead celebrity at that point, eight generations back for me.
Kind of creepy to think about
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:10 am to X123F45
My family came to this country along bayou LaFourche in 1782. Along with 6 other families.
We have to have some interbreeding for the first 50yrs. I rather not know.
We have to have some interbreeding for the first 50yrs. I rather not know.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 11:11 am
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:11 am to X123F45
quote:All of my progenitors were uncommon people.
Finding a common ancestor on both sides when doing ancestry
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:11 am to X123F45
It’s more of an emotional reaction. Genetically it’s not a big deal when it’s that far apart.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:12 am to X123F45
We all related if you go back far enough
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:13 am to LSU Coyote
quote:
We have to have some interbreeding
It certainly explains a lot about how you are today
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:14 am to X123F45
Second cousins only share 3% DNA. That’s not high at all.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:15 am to Mstate
quote:
We all related if you go back far enough
My first wife and my second wife were somehow both born in the same town 2000 miles away. My wife doesn't know it, but I'm like 99% sure they went to k-3 together
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:16 am to X123F45
Welcome to Kentucky, cousin fricker. 
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:17 am to X123F45
I mean if we started out with only two people then their offspring had to procreate with each other or the parents procreated with their own children.
For the Adam and Eve thing to work there had to be a lot of incest.
For the Adam and Eve thing to work there had to be a lot of incest.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:19 am to X123F45
quote:
I tell my wife, and her response is immediately "that's disgusting"
Your wife is mathematically challenged.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:21 am to Stinger_1066
quote:
Your wife is mathematically challenged.
Well she's a woman... So
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:22 am to UKWildcats
Reminds me of the ole Kentucky joke,
“Thank goodness my parents divorced so I could marry my wife. Can you imagine if my parents had remained married and I married my sister.”
Ok, I paraphrased the frick out of it, apologies
“Thank goodness my parents divorced so I could marry my wife. Can you imagine if my parents had remained married and I married my sister.”
Ok, I paraphrased the frick out of it, apologies
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:25 am to X123F45
There are small towns in Louisiana, looking at you Jonesville, where everyone is related somehow.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:25 am to X123F45
when my wife and I were doing wedding invitations we found one name that both of us had from the list on both sides' parents' names and addresses. we grew up about 2 hours away from each other, but didn't have any common acquaintances outside of our college friends
we had a quick stare at each other
she asked her mom who it was and it was her mom's cousin.
my mom said that it was her next door neighbor growing up.
sigh of relief.
we had a quick stare at each other
she asked her mom who it was and it was her mom's cousin.
my mom said that it was her next door neighbor growing up.
sigh of relief.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:32 am to X123F45
If you start doing the math on generations, it becomes quickly apparent that there HAS to be MANY shared ancestors across different branches. 30 generations is like a billion people.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:33 am to X123F45
I got a vacation for asking about breeding between people that don’t know who theirs fathers are so be careful
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:40 am to X123F45
After 4 generations you’re good
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:43 am to X123F45
Everyone has two parents, four grandparents, and 8 greats, etc., doubling each generation. In forty generations, back about 1200 years, your number of ancestors would total one trillion, far more than all the humans who have ever existed. The global population in 800 AD was no more than 200 to 300 million. Mathematicians have calculated that all with European ancestry have a common ancestor within that time frame, and more likely within the past 500 to 600 years.
Popular
Back to top

17








