Started By
Message

re: Finding a common ancestor on both sides when doing ancestry

Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:14 pm to
Posted by SecGamer
Member since Jan 2026
564 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

Bama Board


Beat me to it.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 11:15 pm
Posted by Red Eagle
Member since Aug 2026
74 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

Second cousins only share 3% DNA. That’s not high at all.
Posted by SecGamer
Member since Jan 2026
564 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

Go back just a couple of hundred years when it was very unlikely to move great distances away from home, and villages were more common than big cities, it isn't so odd. My English grandparents (born 1890s) were technically second cousins I believe. My grandmother's grandmother (born 1820s) and my grandfather's grandfather (born 1830s) were brother and sister, giving my grandparents one set of common great grandparents. My grandfather grew up in Durham, my grandmother in London. They met at the wedding of my grandfather's sister.


Auburn fan y’all ^
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
40158 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:26 pm to
quote:


I tell my wife, and her response is immediately "that's disgusting"
women are stupid
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
23355 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:30 pm to
I lost a little interest in ancestry when I realized how many Cajun ancestors were cousins.

They call it Incestry.com for a reason.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram