- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Finding a common ancestor on both sides when doing ancestry
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:14 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:14 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Bama Board
Beat me to it.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 11:15 pm
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:20 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Second cousins only share 3% DNA. That’s not high at all.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:25 pm to PJinAtl
quote:
Go back just a couple of hundred years when it was very unlikely to move great distances away from home, and villages were more common than big cities, it isn't so odd. My English grandparents (born 1890s) were technically second cousins I believe. My grandmother's grandmother (born 1820s) and my grandfather's grandfather (born 1830s) were brother and sister, giving my grandparents one set of common great grandparents. My grandfather grew up in Durham, my grandmother in London. They met at the wedding of my grandfather's sister.
Auburn fan y’all ^
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:26 pm to X123F45
quote:women are stupid
I tell my wife, and her response is immediately "that's disgusting"
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:30 pm to SecGamer
I lost a little interest in ancestry when I realized how many Cajun ancestors were cousins.
They call it Incestry.com for a reason.
They call it Incestry.com for a reason.
Popular
Back to top

0




