Started By
Message

re: Could AI take your job?

Posted on 8/5/26 at 9:58 am to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77912 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Absolutely, and has for some already. It will, initially, take many entry level tech jobs, but I think it will become a tool used to enhance productivity and elevate many of those jobs.
This is where I disagree with you.

If its trajectory continues, why would you need humans for those jobs at all? Maybe a couple to oversee things, but if AI can do the entire job, why pay workers?
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
157190 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

The other half is mind numbing tasks like approving invoices, writing POs, writing internal reports, which I would and will gladly give over to AI

Would you also be willing to take the reduction in pay for doing a lot fewer tasks when AI takes those from you?
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66372 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 9:58 am to
Its been trying. Its not there yet. I give it 10 years which is my retirement age of 53 that ive been shooting for. So I dont care really
Posted by dblwall
Member since Jul 2017
1889 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 9:58 am to
Not sure if AI can nail this like I do.



Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150915 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 9:59 am to
Some aspects, others dont think so
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11789 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:00 am to
Not what I do per se, but yes many roles within my company and day to day tasks like data processing and analysis are being heavily impacted. We aren’t replacing people who quit or retire from operations roles unless they are critical.

I don’t see how it won’t fundamentally change the accounting and financial services industries, along with consulting and marketing etc.

It is subtle in many ways. By making your job easier and faster you don’t have to hire a team so there are positions that just went poof vs 10 years ago. And your boss may eventually not need your role either.
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 10:05 am
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86608 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Would you also be willing to take the reduction in pay for doing a lot fewer tasks when AI takes those from you?


Absolutely not.

And ultimately, none of it will be my choice.
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
25743 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Could AI take your job?



It's a very odd situation to be in but the answer to probably 90% of the people who post here is a resounding yes. I assume the vast majority of posters here are white collar in nature. If you're in sales, accounting, IT, construction management, legal, then yes. If you own the company, I'd guess you're in the best shape. But your competitors are using AI. Their supply chain is using it. Their subs are using it. If you're a contractor of any kind, your competitor is using it to doublecheck estimates. Your competitor is creating agents to crawl the web for better pricing, or to solicit cheaper distributors and subs. If you're a lawyer, or accountant, loan manager, etc the principal of your firm is using it to doublecheck your notes, and to rate your performance.

You have to use it as a tool. If there's 10 of you that could do your job, whomever is using AI to better their performance will survive in that arena. Unlike many naysayers, I do not think we're headed for some cliff. But you may be headed for a different field in your future. Stay open-minded and vigilant. There's ways to navigate this that don't end in Armageddon.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38519 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Sure, but the rate at which it is advancing will make that argument moot in no time at all.

Hell, we have all seen the advancement in the past few years.

How good some of these models have become now will look like fingerpaint compared to where it will probably be in no time.

These businesses have already expressed their goal, to replace the human worker.

This idea of “useful tool” is fine, but that isn’t its predicted purpose.

Pretty much any job that requires a computer is at risk, which is a massive percentage of the job market.



AI is only as smart as the information you give it. always will be even it begins teaching itself. its still always going to be like that

and sure it was take over some physical task too.

and things like data entry and heavy computer based things...yea will be replaced.


lots of the job market will be obsolete. but in the end there will still be haves and have nots. these companies arent giving these things away for free.

AI will make our lives much better and yes it will put a lot of people out of work in the US. its exactly why we dont need any immigration. there has never been a better time to keep production at current levels with 60% of the current population.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
75991 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:05 am to
quote:

I sometimes feel you're underappreciated on this site.
I come from a long line of over-appreciated folks so this is refreshing to hear.

You are marginally an improvement over LCA130.

And we thank you.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20722 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:06 am to
quote:

It would ace the exam and then definitely get the 6 year work requirement or whatever the number is these days


Who’s name will be on the stamp?
Posted by GeauxOn
Texas
Member since Mar 2014
415 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:29 am to
In theory, it eventually can replace my entire job but would still need to be prompted correctly, unless of course it becomes truly sentient and thinks own its own and has the desire to increase shareholder value.

AI would have to get to the point where the whole company is seamlessly integrated, which means every supplier and customer would also need to be seamlessly integrated, which in the world of national distribution is a tall task. In my opinion AI has a people problem. It can solve problems with defined parameters, but it would struggle to understand the individual motivations across departments and finding the correct balance. Add to that, there is the gray area or off the books parts of everyday business AI just wouldnt know what to do with because there is no previous learnings to give it an answer.

While I embrace using AI as a tool and know there are clearly great uses, especially in medical research. I do question what becomes of society if there is a large replacement of jobs. The general society needs the balance of work and life.
Posted by GeauxOn
Texas
Member since Mar 2014
415 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:31 am to
But maybe with the theorized mass layoffs, there will be a push into blue collar jobs and all the infrastructure projects can be completed faster. New Orleans can become pothole free
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71778 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:35 am to
I think my role could be partially replaced with AI, but I do a lot of sales and relationship development that probably wouldn't transition too well. I do use the shite out of AI for research and efficiency as it relates to my job.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
15104 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:38 am to
My job. no. all the new, recent college grads they have hired below me, yes.



Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86608 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:42 am to
quote:

My job. no. all the new, recent college grads they have hired below me, yes.


This is my most immediate concern.

The entry level white collar jobs, which I think we all know are mostly data entry or analysis that managers don't want to do.

I know my first entry level job was mostly regulatory research, where I would read, study, and then present/summarize new regulations to management and clients. Not only was this my entry into my career, it also greatly helped me in learning how to read and understand regulations, which is a huge part of my career.

That job doesn't exist anymore. I can feed AI a 70 page regulation, have it summarize and make a PP presentation in 2 minutes. I don't need a 22 year old to do that anymore.

How are young people going to get to the jobs that AI doesn't replace if those entry level jobs don't exist anymore?
Posted by Dave Worth
Metairie
Member since Dec 2003
1930 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

I think my role could be partially replaced with AI


This is similar to me. I’m a business analyst for a country wide company. Due to different laws by state our hierarchy is organized by states.

When I started I had 1 state. The norm was either 1 BI person per state or nobody (and somebody attempted to do the job plus their own). Then a couple years ago I got one of those empty states added. Now the norm is 2 states per BI person. Some bigger states still have 1, some people have more than 2 if the states are smaller.

Everybody always talks about how necessary my job is. There’s too much gray area for AI or a non expert to be adequate. What most don’t see is how much easier many of my responsibilities have become. I use AI to write complicated formulas (literally tell AI what I want and copy/paste). The company tools that we use are much better and more efficient than they used to be.

For the foreseeable future someone needs to be in place to do my job. But each year we see more combined roles. I’ve told others the more the company dictates more similarities between how states are run the easier it is to cut/combine positions.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

If its trajectory continues, why would you need humans for those jobs at all? Maybe a couple to oversee things, but if AI can do the entire job, why pay workers?


Yeah, the question isn't whether AI will specifically take a certain job.

The question is what does a society do when it makes a large percentage of its jobs unnecessary?


Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
124581 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

devastating impacts to the economic system


Our government had to pump in trillions of dollars in 2020 for what they thought would be a few months of unemployment. If the tech lords are even half right, we are fricked. White collar work fuels the real estate market in every metropolitan area.
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 10:59 am
Posted by IndianPower
Louisiana
Member since May 2021
2209 posts
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:01 am to
If it can retire and cut my grass and drink beer.

If not then thats a solid no.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram