Started By
Message

re: Skubal to Dodgers

Posted on 8/2/26 at 12:28 am to
Posted by Vandergriff
Member since Nov 2020
1632 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 12:28 am to
Ohtani
Yamamoto
Snell
Glasgow
Betts
Freeman
Skubal
Tucker

Remind me how many of those are from the Dodgers elite farm system?

I’ll hang up and listen.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
151340 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 12:29 am to
would love to see the dodgers front office try their luck at running a small market club. they wouldnt survive
Posted by lurking
Member since Nov 2022
3615 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 12:35 am to
quote:

Remind me how many of those are from the Dodgers elite farm system?


None.

That’s the point. They never have to promote anyone because they’re just signing the best players available every offseason or using artificially inflated prospect capital to make trades like this one.

It’s unsustainable, bad for the league as a whole, and will lead to a lockout. Probably a cap, too.

Posted by Vandergriff
Member since Nov 2020
1632 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 12:35 am to
Buying championships is serious business.

Even an Aggie like yourself should understand that!

Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
22587 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 12:59 am to
quote:

Skenes is from Orange County. Prepare for the inevitable

Dodgers might get him for cheaper if they wait a year or two. His velocity keeps dropping.
Posted by IamNotaRobot
OKC
Member since Nov 2021
2144 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 1:10 am to
Tell us something we didn’t know would happen.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55609 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 1:14 am to
quote:

Ohtani Yamamoto Snell Glasgow Betts Freeman Skubal Tucker


I know yall know this is good for baseball… it’s great to see a polarizing large market team and stars you know in the World Series… maybe it seems a bit unfair but casuals just want to be entertained
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18516 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 2:06 am to
The only difference is the Dodgers actually win championships. And Texas A&M doesn't.
Posted by Corporal Beavis
Member since Aug 2013
1353 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 4:57 am to
Is the whole league just a farm system for the dodgers? They're incredibly easy to root against
Posted by boston vol
Lexington-Fayette, KY
Member since Sep 2015
7196 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 6:14 am to
I know they didn’t have a ton of leverage, but it seems like a rather weak haul in return for the best pitcher in the sport.
This post was edited on 8/2/26 at 6:17 am
Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4642 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 6:26 am to
Why is any of this a catalyst for a lockout? Are enough owners upset at a select few of their own to lock out labor? Are the owners in desperate need of a salary cap to protect themselves against each other and agree to a salary floor?

It doesn't seem like MLBPA is concerned unless the floor the owners want to implement is too low.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15429 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 6:50 am to
quote:

This is false based on other reports. The Brewers package was objectively better.


You don’t know what the brewers package was.

Skubal would’ve been a 3 month rental for most teams, including the brewers, because he’s a free agent at seasons end. Brewers weren’t looking to risk their future on that.
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
22030 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 6:50 am to
quote:

They couldn’t deplete their farm system for 2 months if Skubal. They’d be in a hole for years.


Pushing their chips in and going for it is the only way they'll win a world series. Ask their fans if they'd rather 1 championship then a few down years afterwards or a top 3 regular season team that gets bounced in the playoffs every year. Neither is guaranteed obviously, but Skubal on this Brewers team gives them a great shot.

Also, the Brewers farm system might be better than the Dodgers, so the idea that trading 2-3 of their prospects "depletes" them and puts them back years probably isn't true.

This post was edited on 8/2/26 at 6:54 am
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
83086 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 6:54 am to
They are the only team that doesn't have to share their local TV revenue. They aren't "well run" they just have an advantage no other team has.

They also get a lot more leeway in deferring salary. Manfred vetoed the same scam for other teams.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64804 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Pushing their chips in and going for it is the only way they'll win a world series. Ask their fans if they'd rather 1 championship then a few down years afterwards or a top 3 regular season team that gets bounced in the playoffs every year. Neither is guaranteed obviously, but Skubal on this Brewers team gives them a great shot.


You have to ask - would fan involvement be greater in a scenario with a world series win and shitty seasons after? Or continuously making the playoffs and contending over the next 4 - 5 years?

Being a good team and consistently contending over the long term seems more lucrative for fan involvement than winning a single world series and being shite the rest of the time.

The Marlins have won 2 world series in the last 30 years and I dont think it added a single new fan to their revenue.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31740 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:26 am to
Buying championships by circumventing the rules and delaying salaries. The lockout will be fun. Hope the Dodgers get shite on by the league and fans.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
57833 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:28 am to
If that’s the best deal Detroit could have got it’s sad
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
19250 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 7:30 am to
quote:

would love to see the dodgers front office try their luck at running a small market club. they wouldnt survive


To say they are not well run in a relative sense is not fair, but to say they did not have tremendous good fortune with their tv contract in the timing of it is very convenient and obtuse.

Before that the Dodgers were not considered the model franchise, that $350 million a year from that tv contract sure does help.
Posted by msudawg1200
Central Mississippi
Member since Jun 2014
11008 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Ready for the strike

It's actually it's going to be a lockout not a strike, because the players aren't going to agree to a salary cap.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62562 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:45 am to
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram