
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Given the brutal schedule and CLK’s first year, how would you feel with a 7-5 finish?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:29 am to Rhino67
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:29 am to Rhino67
7-5 isn't acceptable. Not with all the people we brought in. It was diff when Saban went to Bama. He had to build up the team with recruits. IT's diff now.
There is no way LSU with CLK is going 7-5. That means we lose to OM, UT, UT, Bama, and A&M or Auburn.
There is no way LSU with CLK is going 7-5. That means we lose to OM, UT, UT, Bama, and A&M or Auburn.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:30 am to Rhino67
Our roster overhaul equated to some of the highest paid portal players in the country
It is a different day and age. You can win quickly with NIL and the portal. See Indiana.
It is a different day and age. You can win quickly with NIL and the portal. See Indiana.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:36 am to Rhino67
The realist in me would say "well...it's his first year, the schedule is brutal, it's an entirely new roster...what else would anyone reasonably expect?"
The other side of me would question why LSU and its boosters spent $40-50 million on a roster and another $20 or so million on the coaching staff for this season to get another Texas Bowl appearance.
The other side of me would question why LSU and its boosters spent $40-50 million on a roster and another $20 or so million on the coaching staff for this season to get another Texas Bowl appearance.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:40 am to sml71
would be disappointed because that most likely means you lost all of your hardest games and at least 3 of them are at home.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:44 am to Rhino67
I would have zero faith in the program.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:53 am to Rhino67
Cignetti went 11-1 his first year at Indiana. I have similar expectations for Lane. Cignetti has already given the blueprint on what needs to be done turning a 3-9 team into a 11-1 team. People always talk about his advanced age of his players but forget that his team was fundamentally sound just like Saban's team. Playing good fundamental football, good Oline and hold his players accountable. Lane Kiffin should have looked at what they did at Indiana and just recreated the same thing.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:00 am to Rhino67
quote:
how would you feel with a 7-5 finish?
My guess is 2027 NIL donations would not be near the level of 2026. . .
Would be hard to get the booster class fired up about that level of performance versus the spend made in 2026.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:05 am to Rhino67
With the amount of money invested, that is not acceptable. With pay for play, and the portal the expectation should be able to win immediately. It doesn't have to be a conference championship, or national championship, but with the investments made being in the top 12 and in discussion for the playoff should be the benchmark.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:15 am to Rhino67
I think we lose one more game this year in the regular season 2 at most
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:32 am to Rhino67
Y’all act like the schedule is going to be easier going forward
Lane better get his shite together or he can gtfo just like CBK
Lane better get his shite together or he can gtfo just like CBK
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 10:33 am
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:35 am to PSU2LSU
He played a MUCH easier schedule same as this year.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:38 am to Rhino67
I must reluctantly agree that a 7-5 record is NOT outside the realm of possibility. Every game in the SEC is a tough one. No cream puffs.

This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 10:41 am
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:41 am to Rhino67
I wouldn't like it but I can see it happening
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:43 am to Rhino67
Has to be 9 wins or better
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:44 am to Rhino67
Just stopped by to see how many downvotes you get. It’s way too early in the season for a post like yours.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:47 am to Rhino67
quote:
Given the brutal schedule
Shite on that. The schedule is always going to be a tough one. Save the "brutal schedule" nonsense.
quote:
Saban went 6-6 his first year at Bama.
Kiffin was 5-5 his first year at Ole Miss.
Apples and oranges comparing those eras to the NIL/portal era.
quote:
Given our schedule and complete roster overhaul and major house cleaning, how would you feel if Lane Kiffin’s LSU Tigers football team finished 7-5 this season?
You didn't have a complete overhaul. Your defense is basically the same staff with upgraded personnel. It wasn't an overhaul nor was it cleaning house.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:48 am to PSU2LSU
quote:
Cignetti went 11-1 his first year at Indiana. I have similar expectations for Lane. Cignetti has already given the blueprint on what needs to be done turning a 3-9 team into a 11-1 team. People always talk about his advanced age of his players but forget that his team was fundamentally sound just like Saban's team. Playing good fundamental football, good Oline and hold his players accountable. Lane Kiffin should have looked at what they did at Indiana and just recreated the same thing.
I mean, I get what you are saying, BUT have you looked at the schedule they played that year? It was laughable. Beyond a Big 10 schedule....a BAD Big 10 schedule. Kind of like A&M in the SEC last year.
That being said... 9-3 minimum or its a huge dissapointment.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 10:52 am
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:48 am to sml71
quote:
the schedule is brutal,
I vomit when I hear this excuse. People don't take the LSU job thinking they'll play a MAC schedule. It's always going to be like this so we may as well quit throwing this excuse out there.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:51 am to Rhino67
Disappointed but not surprised

Popular
Back to top


0








