Favorite team:Nicholls St.
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7149
Registered on:1/22/2016
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
A real list of bankable talents would not have any names on it.
Nearly everybody who hates Trumps actions in Iran now wanted boots on the ground to oust the Ayatollah three months ago.
The ball goes below the knee well in front of the plate.
Ten bucks says 50 tried to get the state to reimburse him for that donation.
quote:

The context here (because of course CA is too frickin lazy to give it) is that he was asked about Gaetz's claims of an alien human hybrid program and he implies that Gaetz is correct.


Gaetz did not say such a program exists. He said he was briefed on such a program. That is a major distinction.
I was at LSU at the same time as him, and knew him. One time I complimented him on his shirt. It was a really nice polo. A few days later I ran into him again, and he says "hey man I have something for you," and he pulls out a Dillard's bag. He went and bought me the same shirt he had on a few days prior. Shane Youman was the guy who would literally give you the shirt off his back.

One of my cousins threw the shot put in a track meet and pitched an inning of relief on the same day, but that was for Nicholls State.
I was an 17 year old virgin heading into my senior year when AP came out. It resonated.

I was a 26 year old virgin when SB came out. The last thing I wanted to relate to at that point was bigger nerds than me getting laid.
quote:

Do you believe in Bigfoot?


Whether the creature exists or not is not a matter of belief. Its fact or fiction. Is it possible. Yes. Is there strong evidence of its existence? No. Is there indirect evidence of its existence? Yes.

Based on available evidence I'm in the does not exist camp, but there is some interesting anecdotal stuff that keeps me interested.
I have a few tortoises that will surely outlive me. This is a very sad day.
Im not a fan of his politics or most of his catalogue. I love Born to Run, and I probably always will.
quote:

I always thought that the film was fake, but I could still see the existence of some species of undiscovered hominid in North America as being plausible, though highly unlikely. People forget just how long Europeans had been interacting with local peoples in sub-Saharan prior to discovering Gorillas. There still are wide empty swaths of land in the West that could hide undiscovered animals because humans just don’t go there.

Do I believe in bigfoot? No.

Would I be surprised at the existence of a bigfoot? No.

Would I be surprised if it never existed at all? Also no.


This is where I fall as well. If this animal is real, the population must be so small that at the very least it is functionally extinct.

I would also add that I would like them to be real. It is neat to live in a world where the mysterious moves from fantasy to reality. If I had a gun to my head, I'd assume the PGF is an elaborate hoax, but there is not any strong evidence of a hoax.

re: Bahá'í Faith

Posted by BlackAdam on 3/31/26 at 2:16 pm to
I had a great aunt that was a Bahai. She was a little bit out there, but a sweet little old lady. It was basically an amalgamation of the positive sides of major world religions.
quote:

BUT you believe this thing is real over some phony because he said some contradictory shite. lol


I did not say I thought it was real. I do contend the film has not been convincingly debunked.
quote:


People still argue about this while the mongoloids who made the fricking thing admitted it’s just one of them in a suit.


That has not happened. One individual has claimed to be the man in the suit, but he has given so many contradictory statements that his credibility is hard to rely on, and he could not replicate the bizarre gait of the creature.
A new documentary called Capturing Bigfoot claims to have unearthed evidence thad debunks the famous Paterson Gimlin film shot at Bluff Creek, CA in 1967.

The debunking claim largely rests on recently unearthed footage that the filmmakers assert was shot in 1966, and was a rehearsal for what they claim to be a hoax. Supporters of the Patterson Gimlin film's authenticity claim the new footage was a re-enactment of the actual encounter.

There is no chain of custody for the new film, so nobody knows when it was actually shot.




LINK
quote:

If this had legs, almost nothing would be bigger news right now.


The fact that he is citing Thomas Townsend Brown is all you need to know this is total kookery.
My grandfathers banana yellow 79 Toyota long bed is sitting in the garage at the old home place. I want to fix it up, but the trunk hasn’t moved in about 25 years. Would probably cost 30 grand to get it running.
quote:

I'm the opposite. The budget was $166M, meaning it needs to make at least $332M to be profitable. I think the movie will make well above that, meaning financially it will be a success.


Probably closer to $750. $166 production budget and probably close to that in P&A. Box office take is probably 45%, so to cover $332 you need more than double the P&A plus production spend. Sometimes on a premium movie there are better percentages, but a $500 million box office means this thing is a loser.
You don’t even understand what you are quoting. Uninhabitable, not because they are totally destroyed. Uninhabitable because they are targets of Irans missile attacks.