
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Given the brutal schedule and CLK’s first year, how would you feel with a 7-5 finish?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 6:14 pm to Rhino67
Posted on 9/24/26 at 6:14 pm to Rhino67
This place is pure misery after a loss. We lose on the road in the other programs Super Bowl against a more talented team on the last play of the game and now we are a 7-5 team. Jesus Christ some of you are just plain dumb.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 6:25 pm to IM_4_LSU
I'm still on board with 9-3 this season. The OL will figure it out and Leavitt will adjust to the speed of the SEC.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 7:13 pm to Rhino67
With a 50 million roster? Kiffin would be the biggest con man ever
Posted on 9/24/26 at 7:36 pm to Rhino67
I predicted 9-3 with a tough schedule, but that is when I thought our Oline was vastly improved and our incoming qb could actually find a receiver and throw a catchable pass. I don't believe either of those are going to change this year. So unless Clark comes in and proves to be the better passing QB, then I can't see how LSU can possibly be better than 7-5. I'll be disappointed, obviously but I will expect LK to be a minimum of 9-3 in year 2, and better than that after that.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 7:44 pm to Rhino67
quote:
how would you feel with a 7-5 finish?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:20 pm to Kool Kaliper
quote:
I got a feeling we are going to lose around 5 games. Kentucky and MSU are games we may lose. Baker defenses have shown the inability to stop mobile QBs and MSU QBs is better than everyone not named Trinidad. A&M-L MSU-L Bama-L Texas-L
If we win Saturday night, I guarantee you that you will be in this forum crowing about how great LSU is and how we’re going to the championship game and making the playoffs.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:25 pm to Rhino67
You dont fire a coach with a 50+ million buyout, give the next guy 13 mil per year, and invest 40+ mil in a roster just to go 7-5.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:28 pm to Tiger1955
quote:got it, that explains why we’re 9 point favorites
Texas A&M are likely losses
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:52 pm to Rhino67
If we go 7-5, they'll being looking for the tar and feathers.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:52 pm to Rhino67
Disappointed!!! I think 8-4 should be the floor. 10-2 the ceiling.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:48 pm to oldskule
quote:
9-3 is the floor
You say that, but we could lose 3 more games before Halloween. Not easily, but it could be done.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:58 pm to Rhino67
NOOOOOOOOOO. Not happening.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:28 pm to Yeahright
We got our 4th choice at QB. Wanted Chambliss then Sorsby then the Washington QB before turning back to Leavitt. Wish we had Mensah. We aren’t good enough on line of scrimmage to win without an elite QB . Baker is an average DC and is exposed against good QBs. Let’s hope Leavitt improves quickly.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 7:02 am to Rhino67
I am going to be extremely pissed at 7-5.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 7:23 am to Rhino67
I would be VERY displeased. I predicted 9-3 and that was mostly due to my concerns with the QB missing the whole spring.
Kiffin had his best year EVER by far in his career last year with a team that had 20 new starters and a new QB. This is NOT 5 years ago. The landscape of college football is different. We spent a ton of money to get talent in and 7-5 is absolutely not acceptable.
Does it mean we can't do better after that? No, but your question was how would you feel about 7-5 and that's my answer, SEC schedule will always be tough and Clemson is not part of that brutal schedule, they suck. So going 4-5 with the roster we paid for - would be a failure of a year.
Kiffin had his best year EVER by far in his career last year with a team that had 20 new starters and a new QB. This is NOT 5 years ago. The landscape of college football is different. We spent a ton of money to get talent in and 7-5 is absolutely not acceptable.
Does it mean we can't do better after that? No, but your question was how would you feel about 7-5 and that's my answer, SEC schedule will always be tough and Clemson is not part of that brutal schedule, they suck. So going 4-5 with the roster we paid for - would be a failure of a year.
This post was edited on 9/25/26 at 7:31 am
Posted on 9/25/26 at 10:10 am to TheRouxGuru
What the frick are you even talking about? This board hasn’t been readable in years.
Imagine being so fricking retarded that you think someone is soft and “out of touch” because they suggest they’ll spend less time on a message board due to the drivel.
Congrats! You truly are a shooting star in a sea of idiots
Imagine being so fricking retarded that you think someone is soft and “out of touch” because they suggest they’ll spend less time on a message board due to the drivel.
Congrats! You truly are a shooting star in a sea of idiots
Posted on 9/25/26 at 2:25 pm to Rhino67
We will be lucky to finish with that record with leavitt, kids awful and needs to play defense
Posted on 9/25/26 at 2:31 pm to Rhino67
Saban and Kiffin didn’t have NIL in those examples. 7-5 would be a complete failure of a season. Especially with a $50 million roster.
This post was edited on 9/25/26 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 9/25/26 at 2:34 pm to TigerFanPA
I am going to trust Lane to be Lane...which means, that I am going to trust him to build a Championship team.

Popular
Back to top


0









