2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you think Lane will be suspended for any time?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:06 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:06 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
You mean since the SEC engaged in exactly the conduct and attained exactly the result Jorden forbade, it's over?
I looked for the text of the order yesterday and didn't find it, so the discussion of the ruling is based on what people say it is and not the text, but it's been alleged/argued that the restrictions only applied once the players were rostered. If they were never rostered by LSU, then there is nothing to violate.
If that's wrong, I'm willing to listen to other reports about the ruling. That seems to be the consensus summary of the ruling on the internet, though.
That choice to not roster the players would be on LSU, not the SEC. They chose not to roster the players. And LSU had always acted under the ruse that these were just random players with no association with LSU, so that makes allegations against the SEC weaker. And, Rousse gutted any claims against the SEC yesterday with his letter, based on when he claims LSU notified the SEC. You're going to run into a timeline issue claiming LSU acted because of the SEC, when LSU stated publicly that it acted prior to the SEC.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:16 am to SlowFlowPro
Shouldn’t the internet lawyer be working instead of playing on here all day and spewing bull shite?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:19 am to AZTiger7072
quote:
It pains me to say that because we have done nothing wrong
We got some p*ssy a** fans. It pains me to deliver this statement.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:20 am to Kool Kaliper
If a penalty was even on the table Rossy Poo would have already leaked it for the SEC to gauge the temperature.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:23 am to billjamin
quote:Why is this an infraction of any kind. Informing someone of their rights isn't against any law or rule.
If they have proof he encouraged the kids to lawyer up then he probably does.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 8:30 am to AZTiger7072
You think the LSU athletic dept gonna a let Kiffin miss A game much less multiple games ain't gonna happen
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:30 am to donut
quote:
Why is this an infraction of any kind. Informing someone of their rights isn't against any law or rule.
Because it's Lane and LSU. If they have anything they can spin into looking like he masterminded this they're going to be sky screaming for a suspension. Y'all are trying to apply logic to a situation thats being run by 16 emotional children(15 SEC presidents plus Sanktard)
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:33 am to AZTiger7072
Lane isn’t missing any games unless he decides to
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're going to run into a timeline issue claiming LSU acted because of the SEC, when LSU stated publicly that it acted prior to the SEC.
LSU admittedly did not roster them prior to the Clemson game due to on going court (SEC suit) AND waiting for SEC guidance, approval.
I.e. LSU was making the SEC tell them yes, or no, after the court rulings and the SEC would not respond.
LSU filled the last two roster spots after the SEC started talking about expulsion.
That could plausibly cover LSU in both situations.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:36 am to AZTiger7072
No
Posted on 9/10/26 at 10:03 am to AZTiger7072
For what?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:03 pm to Ebridg3
quote:
I.e. LSU was making the SEC tell them yes, or no, after the court rulings and the SEC would not respond.
I'm unaware of this. LSU was asking the SEC for guidance after the LA judge ruling and the SEC never responded?
I guess that is why Rousse released that letter?
So LSU couldn't get guidance from the SEC on Wright and Harris even though LSU could've played them legally based on the LA judge ruling. LSU then voluntarily kept them off the roster.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:05 pm to AZTiger7072
A condom would have prevented this post!
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:29 pm to AZTiger7072
They will suspend him for the Ole Miss game and LSU will sue and get an injunction.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:43 pm to AZTiger7072
Should have taken Herm Edwards' advice and not hit send.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:47 pm to AZTiger7072
down vote # 225 !
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:49 pm to AZTiger7072
Yes.
I don’t think he’s on the sidelines for the Ole Miss game
I don’t think he’s on the sidelines for the Ole Miss game
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:52 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Yes.
I don’t think he’s on the sidelines for the Ole Miss game
WHAT
RULE
DID
HE
BREAK?
Posted on 9/10/26 at 1:08 pm to AZTiger7072
I just read that he will be suspended from Saturday night following the game until after church Sunday morning.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News