- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why are you against flock?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:02 am
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:02 am
There should only be one answer. Because they are illegal according to the Constitution. Simple as that.
25
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:04 am to theballguy
Because the 4th amendment gives me the right to be against it
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:04 am to theballguy
Aren't they private owned?
Just like the cameras on my house?
Just like the cameras on my house?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:08 am to theballguy
Because the government is for it
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:09 am to theballguy
That. And they don’t share data with ICE.
It’s a leftist dream and will be used to target patriots.
It’s a leftist dream and will be used to target patriots.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:26 am to theballguy
Because like most baws here, I’m hiding something nasty.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 6:46 am to theballguy
This isn’t that big of an issue to me. I’m really low on the list of people the govt cares about. Do I like it? Not really. Does it really upset me? Nah
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:14 am to theballguy
quote:imagine how many more j6 people the could have rounded up for the gulag if they were watching every license plate too.
Why are you against flock?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:15 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Aren't they private owned?
Just like the cameras on my house?
Is it constitutional to use private companies to go around the constitution?
If it is, then what's the point of the constitution? Just to make sure the government doesn't take away your rights unless a private company is involved?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:18 am to TrueTiger
quote:
the cameras on my house
Will you give me control of those cameras?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:24 am to theballguy
quote:
Why are you against flock?
I have nothing to hide, so I’m not.
I need the government up my arse wherever and whenever I’m in public. It’s for my own protection. I don’t feel safe and secure otherwise.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:31 am to theballguy
Wtf do Flock Cameras even do to make everyone melt down aboyt them recently
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:31 am to theballguy
quote:
There should only be one answer. Because they are illegal according to the Constitution. Simple as that.
The only good flock is a deactivated flock.
But honestly, so sick of this argument. It goes nowhere with the people who would sell out their rights for some arrests.
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 7:36 am
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:34 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Aren't they private owned? Just like the cameras on my house?
Cell phone infrastructure is too.
And government needs a warrant for tracking information from it.
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 7:35 am
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:44 am to theballguy
Because, as has been proven multiple times over, they will be used unlawfully.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:46 am to theballguy
I'm against more threads about flock cameras.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:47 am to theballguy
quote:
There should only be one answer. Because they are illegal according to the Constitution. Simple as that.
There are others. Why would a government 40T in debt spend a penny above what is absolutely necessary to survive?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:51 am to theballguy
For those who are supportive of Flock,
Should you care if your first amendment rights get violated if you had nothing to say at the time?
What about second amendment rights? If you haven't needed a gun so far, do you really need one now? It would be safer for police to enter into your home when they need to knowing you don't have a gun.
If you want to go on the kidnapped child fear mongering, have your child wear an ankle monitor.
Should you care if your first amendment rights get violated if you had nothing to say at the time?
What about second amendment rights? If you haven't needed a gun so far, do you really need one now? It would be safer for police to enter into your home when they need to knowing you don't have a gun.
If you want to go on the kidnapped child fear mongering, have your child wear an ankle monitor.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 7:52 am to theballguy
Ban license plates.
Invasion of privacy.
Vin numbers should never be on dashboards. Who gives the right for someone else to look in my windows?
Ban intersection cameras.
Ban speed cameras in school zones.
Ban cameras in parking lots.
Ban Ring.
Ban smart phones with cameras.
Ban Polaroids.
Ban police sketch artists.
Ban news reporters. I am innocent until proven guilty.
Invasion of privacy.
Vin numbers should never be on dashboards. Who gives the right for someone else to look in my windows?
Ban intersection cameras.
Ban speed cameras in school zones.
Ban cameras in parking lots.
Ban Ring.
Ban smart phones with cameras.
Ban Polaroids.
Ban police sketch artists.
Ban news reporters. I am innocent until proven guilty.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:17 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Wtf do Flock Cameras even do to make everyone melt down aboyt them recently
Used by LE to stalk people for personal reasons, often an ex. More often than not the data that is used is false. Heard it was wrong three times more than it was right. Cameras put in locations where they should not be putting motorist in danger of being impaled by the camera's pole. I am about location that are against our own hwy standards. All of that might have something to do with it.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News