TenWheelsForJesus

quote:

---

Because people said that he would sit with the Dems.

---

It says a lot that it was believable. And it's believable because of Massie's own words and actions fighting his own party as much as McConnell does.

quote:

---

I have already searched for "threat" and "presence" on all 4 pages and found 0 uses of either.

---

Are you aware that people can use different words to describe the same thing? If you are, then you should know that your methodology is flawed.

quote:

---

It is a good idea and I hope it works. However, the initial version of it is a major disappointment after what those in the healthcare business were told was going to be a game changer

---

Why do you people always expect everything to change over night?

We could lower income taxes by shifting to tariffs or other means of revenue generation, but conservatives aren't willing to put up with temporary discomfort for long-term gain. Look at how much they bitch whenever Trump tries to do something different.

It takes time to change a system, but we will be stuck with the status quo because conservatives always complain that it isn't magically better in a couple of days.

Benson is the only one who looks like she wouldn't cut your dick off after you fell asleep. The obvious lesbian gets a pass in this category.

quote:

---

The joke Trump made about women’s hockey was unacceptable

---

Only if you're a little bitch.

quote:

---

Fewer rainbow flags and fewer men in womens locker rooms. Actual laws being enforced. Get to keep your guns. Merit based society. Keep your unrealized gains untaxed. Closed border. No leaving billions of defense equipment in foreign countries for mooslimbs and china to have free of charge. No pallets of cash for iran. No free flow of drugs across our borders. Election integrity. No active military men in dresses and lipstick.
And a free set of balls

---

That's not enough for the "true conservatives," so they will sit at home and give democrats more power because Trump isn't perfect. They really struggle with the big picture. Having to ask what they get for voting against democrats is proof.

quote:

---

Once again Rs have destroyed another opportunity to fix shite on this country while they held presidency and Congress.

---

But for some reason, the majority of vitriol on this board is directed at Trump, the guy who writes EOs we all support, and not the useless shitbags in congress who refuse to codify the changes we all want.

In the future, TDS will be an entire course of study about how almost an entire nation can be fooled into attacking the one person trying to change the corrupt system.

Even though Trump is not perfect, it's insane for him to be the focal point of derision when he has given us more than any politician in our lifetimes. If conservatives had dicks, they would do nothing but step on them.

quote:

---

If so that was pretty dumb because a lot of people now think he's covering up stuff. Why couldn't he release it without being "forced" to?

---

I believe Trump was going to use the files closer to the midterms. But the democrats and their useful idiot conservatives thought they could use the files as a way to attack Trump.

I'm not sure rope-a-dope was the original plan, but like a good leader, Trump worked with what he was given. It's pretty easy to see that the people accusing Trump of a cover up were never going to find the info they for sure thought would bring him down. It's also easy to see that the people accusing Trump of a cover up didn't care about the files before his second term.

Many people are too emotional and biased to look at anything objectively, though.

quote:

---

They have a right to a refund because they are free to set their prices anywhere they choose for any reason they choose whether there are tariffs or not.

---

Well, some companies started putting the tariff as an additional line item to show they weren't increasing the cost of the item.

Are companies allowed to lie about fees they paid to collect more money from consumers? Because that would be the result of your logic.

It's not as black and white as you want to pretend.

Let's be technical though. You claim tariffs are a tax. Taxes can be backdated. The tariffs were not ruled illegal, only that Trump quoted the wrong law (which shows the stupidity of our legal system). So, since Trump can levy tariffs (taxes to you) and taxes can be backdated, then where is the problem?

You can pretend tariffs are taxes, so just pretend Trump backdated the legal tariffs. Now you don't have to cry about it.

It's hilarious how all the people constantly whining about spending now want to force the government to spend more. These idiots don't care about results. They only want things done their way regardless of the outcome.

I just can't take people seriously who constantly bitch about something and then demand action that exacerbates the issue they were complaining about to begin with. If your beliefs cause contradictions, then you need to reevaluate your beliefs.

quote:

---

How a company responded to the illegal tariffs is immaterial to the fact that the government charged them illegally and needs to pay them back.

---

So, you want a bailout. You want to pay corporations with tax payer funds even though the consumers paid the tariffs. Brilliant.

You aren't even demanding that any government loans these companies had are paid back. Nope, you just want to give free taxpayer money to corporations.

quote:

---

This argument is like saying that when the county double charged your property tax last year, you responded by cancelling a vacation to DisneyWorld, which took money out of the economy of Orlando that would otherwise have gone there. So you're not owed a refund on your property taxes because you passed along the tax to Disney.

---

It's not like that at all. How is canceling a vacation to Disney causing them to illegally pay more? Bad analogy.

If Disney gave you the money to cover the additional taxes and then you got a refund on the taxes Disney paid on your behalf, then you would owe that to Disney. You wouldn't deserve the refund. That's the scenario we're discussing.

quote:

---

Why are people here so protective of Erika Kirk?

---

Maybe because Candace Owens' evidence is her dreams.

Why should I allow people to destroy a person's name without actual evidence? I have no attachment to Kirk, but I have a problem with false accusations, even against people I despise. "Acting shady" isn't enough to convince me of a grand conspiracy.

Why are "conservatives" so eager to attack one of their own with flimsy allegations and lies?

The "evidence" for Erika being CIA has been debunked repeatedly. Appearing in a documentary about the CIA does not mean you are in the CIA. Common sense says they wouldn't want to publicly expose agents in that way.

Why are "conservatives" always looking for something to bitch about, even making up shite when there is nothing real to complain about?