Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2588
Registered on:3/4/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

How am I into beastility specifically?


Like your alpha male heroes

sick

probably a closet democrat voter too
quote:

Your problem is that you rely on politicians to do stuff FOR you.


How in the world do you draw this conclusion? If they did nothing, it would be a positive

quote:

All I care about is keeping the democrooks from doing stuff TO me.


So you don't care about the value of your wealth deteriorating? Mass surveillance? Constant foreign military conflicts? Sending money to other countries?
quote:

When casting aspersions on someone, it may be helpful to check some resources first. Here’s the definition of “read” for you to peruse. Take the time to look at the various meanings.


Then you failed to choose proper wording in the context of your arguement.

"There is nothing wrong about my ability to comprehend what I read"
quote:

I can't imagine waking up in the morning knowing you will spend your day partly making comments on a message board that will be completely bereft of any sort of intellectual integrity.


Bruh

Nothing projects America First like importing Communist Chinese students
quote:

Bridge and Power plant day off the table again?


No, now we believe news out of Iran because it meets our bias
quote:

Honestly RFK and MAHA has been a lot weaker than expected and a bit disappointed with such.


MAHA has been disappointed with MAGA protecting Glysophate industry

re: Clark and Longstreet

Posted by RemyLeBeau on 10/5/26 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Dude can't even complete 50% of his passes against McNeese.


Leavitt couldn't complete two TD passes against McNeese using your logic
Pssst, the conservatives haven't been in control of anything since the end of the War for Southern Independence.

Especially beginning in the 19th century we have had two progressive parties.

In your opinion, what politician in DC espouses traditional conservative beliefs and is principled enough to act on them?
quote:

Lincoln was a power hungry, conniving,Tyrant


FIFY
quote:

Not only that, but 100% negative for democrooks as well. By definition, that makes voting Republican a 100% positive.


It makes Republicans the lesser shitty option, but still shitty
quote:

Exactly. Those are the folks thst want to buy the FBi new buildings, likes flock cameras, backs FISA, covers for the deep state, wants to use the FCC to threaten broadcasters, stuff like that….. oh wait.
quote:

Actually, it’s the folks who want to force upon us such things as fa ggotry, feminism, moslems, ghetto culture, ghetto sloth, wealth redistribution, spixican invaders, and general un-whiting and de-Christianization of the country. The opposite of everything that made us great.


Can we not see that all of these things are a threat to our liberty?

There's ZERO positives to modern day Democrats and maybe 20% positives for Republicans

Demos are trying to destroy a once great culture, Reps have been installing the building blocks for a massive authoritarian surveillance state, just waiting for the wrong person to inherit it.

We are getting screwed from both parties.
quote:

There’s lib in libertarian for a reason.
quote:

Liberty
quote:

Such horseshite
quote:

Are all liberal-tarians like SFP? You dont understand basic terms? Try looking up the history of the word libertarian. I know you wont, so here it is


You are one dumb, arrogant, mother fricker

quote:

The word libertarian was first used in 1789 by a political writer named William Belsham. It’s a conjunction of the words ‘liberty’ and ‘unitarian.’ The idea was that human beings, by nature, have autonomous free will. Belsham attempted to borrow from Enlightenment philosophers like John Locke. Locke had destroyed the old idea of the Divine Right of Kings. This fueled peasant revolts that were already happening against Roman Catholicism. Some protestants wanted rulers to simply convert to Protestantism. This is what gave rise to the American Revolution, which was originally considered a Presbyterian rebellion.

re: Longstreet > clark

Posted by RemyLeBeau on 10/4/26 at 7:54 am to
McNeese 2 string defense > McNeese 3rd string defense
quote:

propaganda that Jews are bad


oh no, not muh greatest ally!

quote:

Palestinians, of course Muslims as a people, are extremely worse


Psssst, they both suck and waste our resources
quote:

There’s lib in libertarian for a reason.


Liberty

Great ideas, not very practical in today's world. You have to have a self governing, agreeable, community for it to work at the lowest level.

quote:

That is simply incorrect, every bit of it. It is, however, projection to a “t”. It’s like you transcribed what’s actually and ironically a set of thoughts that run through my own mind quite often. But things best directed at yourself and others of your feather. Most of the time when I see an accusation of projecting, I typically dismiss it as being weak. But this here, I definitely see what those folks are talking

And I, of all people, am not often short on nuance in most of my posts. I’m accused of over-nuance, if anything.


There are posters that give an explanation of their thoughts on a topic and it is rebuffed with "I bet you are upset Kamala isn't president"

Why is MAGA so ingrained in dialectical thinking?
quote:

So to be clear, an attack on our servicemen no matter where they are is considered an act of war?

And you’re accusing ME of failing to grasp critical nuances? Literally unbelievable.


I am accusing you of avoiding to answer the question. Tis started with this bullshite narrative that we have been at war with Iran for 50 years. An obvious ploy to make an emotional plea over them and the hostage crisis. It completely ignores the fact the US fricked around in Iran first and set up the inevitable retaliation towards us.

You mentioned POS Solemani as if he is the scapegoat to claim we are at war since 1979.

So to be clear, is an attack on our servicemen no matter where they are is to be considered an act of war?
quote:


No.

I think Marco’s neocon policies for foreign intervention should be an automatic disqualifier.


We've seen them play out in the last year and a half.