Started By
Message

re: Societal question: Would you trade the crime of today vs 70s-90s?

Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:11 pm to
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15135 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

SFP always spits out stats in these threads that crime was worse in the past. I don't know what to think. Even though it's a murder capital, Detroit is probably as good or better now compared to back then. I'm guessing San Francisco, Seattle, and Portland are way worse now. NYC is probably even. Not sure about Chicago and D.C. (I'm guessing they are worse now). ETA, NOLA has to be worse now.


It’s referenced in the OP.

In the 90s, it was violent gang related crime. Now, it’s mostly property crimes and public nuisance stuff. The violent crime rate is down.

The difference being that, in the 90s, I could avoid crime by not joining a gang or going into a bad neighborhood. Whereas now, I can’t avoid the lunatic homeless guy jerking off in front of my local supermarket. It’s a lot more visible and people feel unsafe.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13529 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

You’re grumpy this afternoon.


Not at all.

But even if I were, that wouldn't change anything.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13529 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

I haven’t heard a simple explanation that I’m willing to accept yet.


So when you said that incarceration has no effect on crime, you didn't really believe that?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13529 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:41 pm to
quote:


Almost every bad outcome you can think of is tied to a single parent household.



And more single parent households are inarguably tied to feminism.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13529 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:41 pm to
quote:


Ok. Let’s say they are. Now what?


Vote Republican.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41747 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Not sure why the assumption is that I do. But if I stop voting altogether, will that solve all our problems across the entire country?


Of course you skip all of my other posts calling you out for flawed reasoning, but you focus on this one, so I will play along:

Its a safe assumption based on your posting history,
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
62244 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

Societal question: Would you trade the crime of today vs 70s-90s?


What if you are asking the wrong question in the first place?

What if crime has dropped because the young criminals in the 70's to 90's are older, in prison, dead, etc.

High young population = high crime

Baby Boomers were in their 30's to 50's in the 70's to 90's

Lower population after boomers means fewer young people to commit crime.
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
1719 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 8:34 pm to
Give me the 90’s. I don’t remember crime being a problem in the 90’s. I never considered that I might get killed by stray bullets at the Mall of Louisiana (while picking up a pair of Girbaud jeans and hypercolor shirts)..
Posted by icecreamsnowball
Member since Mar 2025
1372 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

Treatment of mental illness is a bipartisan fault.
I agree, but it isn’t close to 50/50 as far as which side is responsible.
They literally celebrate it.
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 8:57 pm
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157895 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 8:57 pm to
Yes. Because I was no where near the violence of big cities in the 70s and 80s

Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61417 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Of course you skip all of my other posts calling you out for flawed reasoning,


All your other posts blamed democrats or liberals or leftists. What response were you expecting? I did not suggest democrats or republicans were guilty or innocent of anything. Reducing complex social deterioration to “Democrats did it” or “Republicans did it” isn’t particularly compelling to me.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61417 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

quote:

I haven’t heard a simple explanation that I’m willing to accept yet.
So when you said that incarceration has no effect on crime, you didn't really believe that?


How are these two ideas related?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61417 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

But even if I were, that wouldn't change anything.


Sometimes you offer thoughtful engagement but you’re choosing to exclusively patronize me in this thread. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that maybe you’re just having a bad day.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:23 pm to
Yes.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:25 pm to
quote:


What if crime has dropped because the young criminals in the 70's to 90's are older, in prison, dead, etc.



I was a critic of the mass incarceration of the 90s until I saw how well it actually worked.

Clean up 2-3% of the population and our country would look pollyanna.

Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
2562 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:27 pm to
Yes, at least back then activist judges were less prevalent and dangerous criminals were more likely to be put away.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13529 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

How are these two ideas related?


Your conclusion was based on a vastly oversimplified assumption with no basis to make it.

That directly contradicts this claim.

quote:

I haven’t heard a simple explanation that I’m willing to accept yet.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13529 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Sometimes you offer thoughtful engagement


Sometimes you do too, but you're acting like a 15 year old in this thread.

Me noticing that and commenting on it doesn't require me to be having a bad day.

Why don't you engage the egregiously fallacious nature of your comments that I am pointing out rather than trying to gaslight me for pointing them out?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61417 posts
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Why don't you engage the egregiously fallacious nature of your comments that I am pointing out rather than trying to gaslight me for pointing them out?


What specific comment do you find so offensively egregious?
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41747 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 4:52 am to
quote:

All your other posts blamed democrats or liberals or leftists. What response were you expecting? I did not suggest democrats or republicans were guilty or innocent of anything. Reducing complex social deterioration to “Democrats did it” or “Republicans did it” isn’t particularly compelling to me.



No, not true.
We have pointed out the flaws of your reasoning. You have yet to comment on it.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram