- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Patriot sheriff from Nevada tells a woke judge to shove it
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The accused has a homicide conviction
Seems a bit more complicated
0
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
so you wouldnt take him in even though he's innocent? On brand
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:31 am to ApexTiger
quote:
35 arrests?
We've tried experimenting releasing perpetrators with long arrest records.
The results haven't been good.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Bail is a constitutional right.
Not how I read the 8th. I read it saying, "If bail is imposed, it can't be excessive." I don't read it to say, "You are guaranteed the right to reasonable bail."
Otherwise, how do judges deny bail, if it's a guaranteed constitutional right?
quote:
I'll keep defending our rights, especially when LEO breaks the law and violates those rights. That's an incredibly American philosophy. I'm sorry y'all are abandoning fundamental pillars of America for feelings.
Meh, you stand on a Constitutional soapbox when it's convenient to you and you hop off and stand on tradition as soon as it's not. As in the case of Article 1, Section 4.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 8:38 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
“ Strange sides y'all are taking. I'll keep defending our rights, especially when LEO breaks the law and violates those rights. That's an incredibly American philosophy. I'm sorry y'all are abandoning fundamental pillars of America for feelings.”(quote SF).
Haha. More Lawyering. “If the glove don’t fit, gotta acquit”.
This is why our System is crashing and honest people are abandoning Rule of Law. Marxist ideology Judges who - like Lawyers- “strain at a gnat and swallow a camel”.
Good people are not going to be preyed upon by these sociopaths for much longer and smart people know what is coming and the only way that this corrupt Judiciary can be stopped cold. So did the Founders. And it ain’t Systemic Due Process. Sadly so. And the corrupt Lawyers, Judges and Politicians who directly or indirectly foist this on the good people will own the blood.
Haha. More Lawyering. “If the glove don’t fit, gotta acquit”.
This is why our System is crashing and honest people are abandoning Rule of Law. Marxist ideology Judges who - like Lawyers- “strain at a gnat and swallow a camel”.
Good people are not going to be preyed upon by these sociopaths for much longer and smart people know what is coming and the only way that this corrupt Judiciary can be stopped cold. So did the Founders. And it ain’t Systemic Due Process. Sadly so. And the corrupt Lawyers, Judges and Politicians who directly or indirectly foist this on the good people will own the blood.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:51 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
how do judges deny bail, if it's a guaranteed constitutional right?
There are several reasons why a person charged with a crime can be detained without bail.
The term, "serial offender," should applicable in this situation.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:56 am to prouddawg
I'm guessing Democrat judge who wants to release violent criminals and put the sheriff in jail.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:01 am to DawgCountry
quote:
so you wouldnt take him in even though he's innocent?
When did I say he's innocent?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:09 am to prouddawg
At 0.58, he looks like the typical beta cuck liberal judge. Not a surprise at all.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:10 am to prouddawg
New law, judges agree to be listed as accomplices for any future crimes
That those they release commit and accept equal punishment.
That those they release commit and accept equal punishment.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He has a homicide conviction and has been arrested 35 times. That's a fact.
And? He's presumed innocent of these current charges. Or do you want to shite on that part of the Constitution, too?
If he's convicted of the current charges, that history will play a role in sentencing I imagine.
Criminal history IS taken into consideration when considering pre-trial detention. And the Nevada ruling which orders the least restrictive means of detention can easily be used to demonstrate this is a career criminal that has a repeated pattern of violence when not actively confined by the state. The judge CHOSE to interpret the ruling this way. He was not bound to do so.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The sheriff is breaking the law.
Where has your outrage been concerning this Sheriff breaking the law?
One sheriff is protecting citizens and the other is harboring an illegal groper of minors .
I rarely reply to your posts because they are always selectively anti-American.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Strange sides y'all are taking. I'll keep defending our rights, especially when LEO breaks the law and violates those rights.
When the founding fathers would have supported hanging this guy instead of turning him loose.
It's hilarious what's now deemed "unconstitutional" that was very constitutional when the people who assembled the Constitution was still alive.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
A side note, knowing you are a stickler for the letter of the Law:
I think I recall some Law or Statutory derivative therein which give local Sheriffs extraordinary powers re local sovereignty. There was a case a couple of years back when our own Parish was electing a new sheriff that brought this issue to the fore and I well remember questioning a potential candidate as to their knowledge and intent re such a issue.
This may have come under some form of ‘Martial Law’ type scenario but I seem to remember it being otherwise. As if it were up to the Local Sheriff to determine the degree of potential harm to their constituents in evoking this extraordinary Statutory authority. Am I wrong?
I think I recall some Law or Statutory derivative therein which give local Sheriffs extraordinary powers re local sovereignty. There was a case a couple of years back when our own Parish was electing a new sheriff that brought this issue to the fore and I well remember questioning a potential candidate as to their knowledge and intent re such a issue.
This may have come under some form of ‘Martial Law’ type scenario but I seem to remember it being otherwise. As if it were up to the Local Sheriff to determine the degree of potential harm to their constituents in evoking this extraordinary Statutory authority. Am I wrong?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:09 am to Chrome
quote:
Police are tired of bearing the brunt of bad decisions of lefty judges (who don't seem to give a rat's arse about citizens).
It’s similar to what teachers deal with in public education. You have those kids who are constantly doing things that should have gotten them expelled long ago, but administrators and a system devoid of common sense keeps putting them right back on the teacher to deal with at the expense of all the other students.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Strange sides y'all are taking. I'll keep defending our rights,
Fool me once. Shame on you.
Fool me twice. Shame on me.
Fool me 35 times. Shame on woke pieces of garbage like you who think this criminal is anything but a burden on society.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:54 am to LSUbest
If a judge can not adjudicate a police or sheriff's decision, we have become a police state!!
Posted on 3/16/26 at 11:16 am to Timeoday
“ If a judge can not adjudicate a police or sheriff's decision, we have become a police state!!”(quote Td).
Very true,T. And very effective and efficient if the scenario requires such to protect the GOOD people. Not overt murderers as has become the principle. I think we are closer than most people think to said “police state”. Hell, UK has taken that leap so the idea that we can avert such is unlikely. It’s just a matter of what Ideology is the base for formal power/police state. Iran and Venezuela being current examples.
Half this board will be adjudicated to be a threat to national security if the Democrats run the show. No bail. Trump and MAGA knows this and just like the Iranian Mullahs, will NOT allow either the Dems or the Mullahs to hold power. “Whatever it takes “ is in play. Obviously so in both cases.
We can kiss that vote stuff good night, UNLESS the ballots are 100% verified. They had better pass that Save Act Law. Not counting of votes but scrupulous examination re signature of Voter and Witness, legality as a Citizen and Address (no 500 ballots coming from the same address). In other words FAIR. Albeit “fair “ has become subjective for the DEI Left. And the Mullahs. And Marxist.
It’s coming.
Very true,T. And very effective and efficient if the scenario requires such to protect the GOOD people. Not overt murderers as has become the principle. I think we are closer than most people think to said “police state”. Hell, UK has taken that leap so the idea that we can avert such is unlikely. It’s just a matter of what Ideology is the base for formal power/police state. Iran and Venezuela being current examples.
Half this board will be adjudicated to be a threat to national security if the Democrats run the show. No bail. Trump and MAGA knows this and just like the Iranian Mullahs, will NOT allow either the Dems or the Mullahs to hold power. “Whatever it takes “ is in play. Obviously so in both cases.
We can kiss that vote stuff good night, UNLESS the ballots are 100% verified. They had better pass that Save Act Law. Not counting of votes but scrupulous examination re signature of Voter and Witness, legality as a Citizen and Address (no 500 ballots coming from the same address). In other words FAIR. Albeit “fair “ has become subjective for the DEI Left. And the Mullahs. And Marxist.
It’s coming.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 11:21 am to prouddawg
Usually, in these cases, and in the world of Normality, which existed before Progressivism murdered America, when Law Enforcement feels this strongly, a judge relents.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 11:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Strange sides y'all are taking. I'll keep defending our rights, especially when LEO breaks the law and violates those rights. That's an incredibly American philosophy. I'm sorry y'all are abandoning fundamental pillars of America for feelings.
Citizens have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Violent criminals walking the streets take away these rights. So, when the rights of law-abiding citizens and criminals collide, you choose to side with the violent career criminals.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News