- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No raise for teachers & Judges have to retire @ 70 years of age
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:56 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:56 am
This is the 2nd consecutive time that people refuse to increase pay for teachers. What is TD opinions on these amendments?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:58 am to BigNastyTiger417
I voted no because a teacher told me to. They are worried about the State stealing from the retirement fund and the raise is the bait.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:00 am to RougeDawg
quote:
I voted no because a teacher told me to. They are worried about the State stealing from the retirement fund and the raise is the bait.
This should tell you all you need to know about how "underpaid" teachers are.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:01 am to BigNastyTiger417
Maybe if they word an amendment that reduces the excessive salaries paid to parish school administrators and apply the savings to teacher salaries might we see it pass.
School administrators are robbing school systems blind!!
School administrators are robbing school systems blind!!
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:07 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
This should tell you all you need to know about how "underpaid" teachers are.
They’re actually one of the most underpaid professionals in our country. Considering their responsibilities, what they’re tasked with and do (and deal with) on a daily basis, and what they’re paid, it’s a wonder we have anyone left who still wants to do it.
There are some really bad educators out there. But you won’t improve the caliber of candidate, or the level of motivation for entering the field, by grossly underpaying the people who perform the job.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:10 am to BigNastyTiger417
It doesn’t require a state amendment to actually give a raise. It also kills 3 funds that go to important things needed in school that the government does not have in writing how it will continue to provide it. After this year the “raise” is not guaranteed since it would ultimately fall back to the local school district. Four frick Landry and his grubby paws trying to give out more money to La Gator.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:19 am to Timeoday
quote:
Maybe if they word an amendment that reduces the excessive salaries paid to parish school administrators and apply the savings to teacher salaries might we see it pass.
That is probably one of the central issues with education today.
Some school systems have created unnecessary levels of administrators and central office personnel. Some school systems have multiple assistant superintendents, multiple supervisor positions, and several assistant principals and master teacher programs that remove educators from the classroom and place them in administrative or supervisory roles instead of teaching.
On top of that you have some of these roles that being filled with DEI in mind and some of these people do not have the best interests of the students in mind. They are there just to line their pockets in their new 6 figure role and implement narcissistic tasks so they can feel important in their role.
This post was edited on 5/18/26 at 1:27 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:26 am to RougeDawg
quote:
They are worried about the State stealing from the retirement fund and the raise is the bait.
The retirement debt will be paid off by the school systems by 2029 based on laws passed in the Roemer administration. Then districts can use the savings for whatever they choose.
The amendment shifted some dedicated funds to pay the debt now and force districts to use the savings for a 2250 "raise" moving forward. The state has been paying a 2000 stipend to teachers out of the general fund that would end with the "raise."
Teachers voted against it because it is just a shell game sold as a raise. Surrounding states have given their teachers real raises. Louisiana is one of the top states for educational gains. The teachers should be rewarded like the teachers in Mississippi were for similar gains.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:27 am to RougeDawg
quote:
I voted no because a teacher told me to. They are worried about the State stealing from the retirement fund and the raise is the bait.
I voted no because:
-This would have been one-time money. You can't fund a raise on one-time money.
-The programs these funds go towards would then go unfunded and the cries would have been about how they are such a tragic loss for the state that our children will suffer for it so we need to come up with a new way to fund them (read: new taxes).
-BESE can already allocate that money to pay if it chooses to. So far, it hasn't. Teachers should be focusing on BESE for the fix instead of voters.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:27 am to Wellborn
quote:
They’re actually one of the most underpaid professionals in our country.
How many hours per year do they work?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:27 am to BigNastyTiger417
quote:
This is the 2nd consecutive time that people refuse to increase pay for teachers.
Teachers voted them down en masse both times.
I don’t get it.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:28 am to Wellborn
Katy ISD pays teachers with 0 years of experience $66k.
At 5 years of experience they get paid $71k with a $5k a year retention bonus. That's plenty, and doesn't include TRS.
Teachers can choose their school districts, which principals they want to work for or don't, and what grades they want to teach.
Schools and parents never consider the strings of taking federal money for SPED kids of all stripes. Oh, the school gets an extra $5k a year for a SPED kid, but then has to hire a paraprofessional for every three of them? But they "won" money, right? And then you have to have special curriculum coordinators for every so many of these SPED kids, etc. But you got that $5k per head. Yay?
At 5 years of experience they get paid $71k with a $5k a year retention bonus. That's plenty, and doesn't include TRS.
Teachers can choose their school districts, which principals they want to work for or don't, and what grades they want to teach.
Schools and parents never consider the strings of taking federal money for SPED kids of all stripes. Oh, the school gets an extra $5k a year for a SPED kid, but then has to hire a paraprofessional for every three of them? But they "won" money, right? And then you have to have special curriculum coordinators for every so many of these SPED kids, etc. But you got that $5k per head. Yay?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:30 am to BigNastyTiger417
I cant retire until i am 70, why should they get special privledges?
Even with a decent 401k and pension plan with matching, the economy, because of biden and the exwife taking half of my 401k in 2022 it is impossible and i am middle class income between 100 and 150k.
Even with a decent 401k and pension plan with matching, the economy, because of biden and the exwife taking half of my 401k in 2022 it is impossible and i am middle class income between 100 and 150k.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:31 am to weagle1999
quote:
How many hours per year do they work?
Teachers?
50 hours per week give or take X 38 weeks.
Hourly, it’s a very good paying job.
Coaches, on the other hand, get wrecked. We are talking 3-4 bucks an hour (or less…depending upon the sport).
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 8:32 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:31 am to Wellborn
Teachers are adequately paid. They do not fall in the top 25 professions which are underpaid (according to Forbes).
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:32 am to Timeoday
quote:
Maybe if they word an amendment that reduces the excessive salaries paid to parish school administrators and apply the savings to teacher salaries might we see it pass.
School administrators are robbing school systems blind!!
Some school system needs to challenge the "Jindal Law" regarding the currently held belief that school boards have no say in the hiring of personnel. It is my opinion that the law keeps a school board member from going to the superintendent and attempting to leverage their position to hire friends and family. It doesn't mean that the school board can't set a cap on administrators, decide which positions will exist, etc. At some point a school board will need to make a decision and let the courts sort it out. Until that happens these administrators will just keep hiring people to do their job for them.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:33 am to Shaun176
quote:
educational gains
Being able to just get up off the floor is kind of expected and isn’t anything extraordinary. I see no reason to reward well below average results.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:35 am to LemmyLives
quote:so you cherry picked one of the highest paying districts in Texas, not even Louisiana for your argument then you top it with this whopper
Katy ISD pays teachers with 0 years of experience $66k. At 5 years of experience they get paid $71k with a $5k a year retention bonus. That's plenty, and doesn't include TRS.
quote:I’ve never read a larger pile of horse shite. So a teacher picks their principal? Never heard that! I guess every football coach in the state should just go work at John Curtis it’s that easy! And hell why stop at teachers why not apply your logic to all professions. Lawyers can pick any law firm they want according to your logic. A doctor can pick any hospital or dr office to work at and any field of medicine according to your logic
Teachers can choose their school districts, which principals they want to work for or don't, and what grades they want to teach.
Yeah every human has a choice for what job they have. Hell a teacher can choose to stop teaching if they want, many do, but to act like people are choosing to work in, oh I don’t know let’s pick a place, Arcadia Louisiana because that’s where they want to be is insane. I don’t have a dog in this fight, don’t care what teachers Louisiana make, but your whole argument is beyond stupid
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 8:38 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:42 am to BigNastyTiger417
Judges arent forced to retire at 70. They just can't run again after 70. So if a judge is elected at 69 and it's a 6 year term they can serve until they are 75. And appellate court judges and the Louisiana Supreme Court justices have 10 year terms. So some could possibly serve until 79. Just depends at what age they are when they run for their last term.
This post was edited on 5/17/26 at 8:43 am
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:43 am to LemmyLives
quote:
Katy ISD pays teachers with 0 years of experience $66k.
At 5 years of experience they get paid $71k with a $5k a year retention bonus. That's plenty, and doesn't include TRS.
This is the problem for Louisiana. Teacher pay in Louisiana is about 20k less across the board. Katy is a little more expensive but not that much more.
Popular
Back to top

23









