Hawgnsincebirth55

[quote]Arkansas isn’t elite either[/quote] in baseball? We’ve been a top 10 team for the past 5 straight years so yeah... I’d say we are pretty elite...

[quote]He wasn’t honorable and determined. He was psychotic and a fool[/quote] I would say he was honorable in his own twisted sense and by no means a fool. The biggest issue is he was 100% without a doubt, unequivocally, coocoo for coco puffs insane. ...

[quote]You can also gain some value experience from twice as many practice reps and twice as much time in the film room.[/quote]you can but again then they wouldn’t be equal if you took advantage of those extra reps and so you’d start the better player. I really didn’t think this was that hard of a ...

So hopefully smith keeps that spot at 3rd. Nesbit can’t hit his way out of a wet paper bag ...

I just think all things being equal and I do mean all things then you take the younger guy because there’s no negative and the positive of the guy getting experience that provides value for the future that only a live game situation can. If you have an older guy who didn’t start the year before but ...

[quote]Screw who has earned something. That sophomore can transfer out and hurt your team more than playing the equal senior can help.[/quote] but don’t you know every senior is smarter and knows more than every sophomore l. They’re two years older and no sophomore or freshman has ever started a...

[quote]So you are willing to blow you whole team up for a Sophomore? No I have never played OL but I did work in D1 Football for over 10 years and 2 years in the NFL, so know little bit about it, probably more than you.[/quote] why would I be blowing my team up? I’ve coached over 10 years myself...

[quote]Helm just start all your talented freshmen over the upper class men since they will be there longer.[/quote] if the talented freshman have the same ability to execute I will. But if I’m gonna win more with the upperclassman I’m going to start them. It’s all about who’s going to give you the b...

[quote]If this clown was actually trying to win he would either move one of the guys to G. But we know he is not. If he was going to blow up his whole OL for a Soph, then he is not very smart either. This Sophomore better be all district level, today. [/quote] my guards are entrenched starters from ...

[quote]Why does it even matter? Why is it stupid? You get the same performance and outcomes, it doesnt even matter. THIS IS STUPID.[/quote]because you have two more years with Johnson? He can learn things from this year starting that he can apply next season that you can only learn by being ...

Because after this season I won’t get to use the senior again he’s gone. But the sophomore ive got 2 more years with. It’s not that hard. Obviously no matter who I start if I see one guy out performing or underperforming then I can put the other guy in. The only argument you guys have given for why ...

[quote] Message If you’ve got a sophomore and a senior with equal talent/skill at a position by kengel2 So you would start the senior because your hypothetical is stupid and you just agreed that a senior would have improved over time and give you the best shot to win. [/quote] no you don’t beca...

Okay I guess we’re arguing semantics? Obviously sophomore joe and senior joe were the same human but one was not the same player as the other. In the OP I stated that in the hypothetical we are talking about the sophomore has the same talent/ skill as the senior. So that means mentally and physicall...

[quote]Well they are equal talent and skill one just has a experience [/quote] reading defenses, going through progressions, arm strength, accuracy,pocket presence are all skills/talent whatever you want to call it, and they improve over time. The sophomore burrow was not the same player as the seni...

[quote]Again in your idiotic hypothetical you’d rather start sophomore Joe Burrow than Senior Joe Burrow.[/quote] what? So you think sophomore joe burrow on a practice field would look like senior joe burrow? If we put that film in and compared them side by side? No because you’d watch film and poi...

No you go with the sophomore because he will get better at a faster rate than the senior. And you will have him for 2 more years. If one player has equaled the talent he’s at currently after 3 years of being within the program and the other has reached the same place in 1 year, than the second playe...

It’s sophomore that’s the correct answer ...

[quote]Fact is all things are never truly equal.[/quote] but in this case they are dude. Damn just imagine both guys are exactly the fricking same. Equally good equally bad equal! Period. Done. Stop trying to bull shite with who’s smarter, who works harder etc. I’m telling you they’re the same fricking ...

[quote]Many times athletes need actual game experience to progress[/quote] agreed, which is why If the sophomore and senior are the same I’m starting the younger guy. He’s gonna learn just as much as the senior and I’ll have him two more years. If the senior is more mature in mind and body that woul...

Left tackle with a left handed qb so weak side tackle ...