- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breitbart just dropped a bomb. 85 page Memo from Google!
Posted on 10/10/18 at 1:28 am to Ebbandflow
Posted on 10/10/18 at 1:28 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
How is that legitimate?
Oh so now you want credible verifiable evidence?
What happened to guilty until proven innocent and #believeanyonennomatterwhat
How dare you question the accuser of Google? You are disparaging whistle blowers everywhere. Why are you encouraging and supporting corporate greed culture. Why are you attacking all victims of enron and Bernie Madoff?
quote:
seeing the absence of something that you think should be there is not proof
This post was edited on 10/10/18 at 1:29 am
2
Posted on 10/10/18 at 1:40 am to Nguyener
Wow. Provocative post. I’m being serious.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 1:54 am to shinerfan
quote:and "small government" "conservatives" will cheer
Yesterday I would have disagreed but if that memo is real Google is getting Ma Belled.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 2:01 am to Nguyener
quote:
Oh so now you want credible verifiable evidence?
What happened to guilty until proven innocent and #believeanyonennomatterwhat
Whataboutism that isnt relevant. Nice. Does that mean you now believe the Accuser dr. Ford since you believe this accuser? See how stupid that is?
quote:
You are disparaging whistle blowers everywhere. Why are you encouraging and supporting corporate greed culture. Why are you attacking all victims of enron and Bernie Madoff?
What whistleblower? I sure haven't seen one in this case
I bet you thought your response was really intelligent.
This post was edited on 10/10/18 at 2:03 am
Posted on 10/10/18 at 2:13 am to cave canem
quote:
The amount of mental frickery going on here is outstanding.
Seems the same batch of folks up in arms about government intrusion into the net over the net neutrality debate are all now calling for government intrusion, of special note are the dipshits who think they have free speech rights with a private company that provides a free service.
Google is free to sensor WTF it wishes to, if you have an issue with it use a different search engine, the shareholders will demand change soon enough if revenue drops.
Have an upvote
Posted on 10/10/18 at 2:16 am to genro
quote:
Google has a near monopoly on search engines
Lol. You dont understand monopoly. Also, searching is a free service. Don't you just know when you're devoid of a point enough to just stop talking?
Posted on 10/10/18 at 3:07 am to Ebbandflow
But IS Google a private-owned company, or do they sell public shares?
Posted on 10/10/18 at 4:16 am to bmy
quote:
don't like how google optimizes their products? use a different one.
Basically this is my point to Americans wanting to fundamentally change our system of government. Don’t like it? Move someplace more to your liking. No need to ruin it for everyone else.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 5:08 am to Jjdoc
I would just like to point out that Google and other companies were huge proponents of net neutrality because supposedly it would prevent companies from doing exactly what Google wanted to do at precisely the same time.
Maybe Google was lying about the reasons for support.
Maybe Google was lying about the reasons for support.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 6:10 am to ShortyRob
This is the point that captain obtuse and his sidekick retard boy refuse to acknowledge. The question really isn’t whether this censorship is legal. It’s about being ideologically consistent, and being honest with your users.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 6:13 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
This is the point that captain obtuse and his sidekick retard boy refuse to acknowledge. The question really isn’t whether this censorship is legal. It’s about being ideologically consistent, and being honest with your users
The extension of my point is that everyone was selling net neutrality as a tool to prevent this kind of behavior yet the company's most for it also wanted to engage in his behavior. kind of makes you think they were lying about what net neutrality would do in their minds
Posted on 10/10/18 at 6:13 am to Vacherie Saint
Yeah. I don’t want to make Google change the way they do business.
But they need to be honest about it.
We require labeling for all sorts of industries. Maybe just have a label on Google’s homepage. “We’re mostly queer and we hate you if you drive a truck.” Something like that.
But they need to be honest about it.
We require labeling for all sorts of industries. Maybe just have a label on Google’s homepage. “We’re mostly queer and we hate you if you drive a truck.” Something like that.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 6:39 am to the808bass
"We only hire from the island of misfit toys".
Posted on 10/10/18 at 6:45 am to Jjdoc
I was lambasted for calling this a free speech issue. This memo proves, very clearly, that this is a free speech issue.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 6:46 am to Jjdoc
Google needs to have the Ma Bell treatment...time to break it up...
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:03 am to Ebbandflow
When free speech is the issue on a communication platform then it should be discussed.
Google is becoming too big much like Ma Bell did. Once you influence over 90% of internet users and are in a unique position as the gatekeepers of information, have admitted to political bias, and at the same time covering up data breaches in fear if regulations, it's time
Google is becoming too big much like Ma Bell did. Once you influence over 90% of internet users and are in a unique position as the gatekeepers of information, have admitted to political bias, and at the same time covering up data breaches in fear if regulations, it's time
This post was edited on 10/10/18 at 7:06 am
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:04 am to musick
In it's own way, this seems as huge as the FISA memo. If you think downstream, bigger even.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:12 am to Jjdoc
Breitbart is a bastion of truth, Alex Marlowe is the real deal 
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:48 am to TrueTiger
quote:
wtf is happening to the posts in this thread?
Censorship and bans. In a thread about free speech no less
Posted on 10/10/18 at 7:53 am to genro
Sounds like your problem is related to net neutrality.. take it up with the FCC. You won't find any support outside of Q larpers and infowar shills though.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News