Favorite team:New Orleans Saints 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:47620
Registered on:8/25/2015
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
This is why the left is so frantic about the so-called “manoshere”, Rogan, toxic masculinity, etc.
Why are progressive leftists upset that the so-called “most conservative legislator in DC” lost his race?
He shilled for Fanni non-stop as well. He thinks if he denies it enough, he can convince himself it never happened. And since he only cares about his own emotions, and no one else, thats good enough.

re: About this ballroom

Posted by Vacherie Saint on 5/20/26 at 5:41 pm to
Are you demented? Someone tried to kill the POTUS and VP at a presidential ball hosted in a hotel less than a month ago.

Maybe that's why the media and libslime stfu about it.
Perhaps. It doesnt mean we should not attack both or that one cannot exist without the other.
quote:

Without major spending decreases this is just virtue signaling.


Here we are, right back where we started.. and its still retarded. You don't care about government waste, fraud, and abuse as long as we run deficits.
I consider Massie a guy who talks a good game but doesnt do frick.
Thats actually funny considering Kevin McCarthy was a dyed in the wool Boehner acolyte
quote:

Wait.. Massie’s largest donor is Jewish billionaire Jeff Yass?
Its not complicated. The conservative puritans would rather hear 100% of what they agree with from a politician that gives them nothing. The rest of society is willing to elect someone who says only 75% of what they agree with, but delivers results.

I think Kentuckians ultimately realized that Massie was the former.
And Romney, like Massie, is regaled by Progressive Democrats. Yet here you are, calling us democrats for recognizing that Massie can't catch up to his rhetoric. Priceless.

Maybe the people of Kentucky want more than talk.
What did you "call"?

You said that DOGE was pointless without deficit reduction. That's factually incorrect because these issues are not mutually exclusive. I even gave examples. There should be zero tolerance for fraud, waste, and abuse - Deficit or no deficit.
Then, you tried to trick me into tacitly accepting your logic by asking me to buy into a false choice. I'm not biting.

Did Massie say all the right things? Sure.
Did he achieve anything? No.
Did he attempt form a coalition? No.
Did he obstruct party progress in his refusal to compromise on anything? Yes.

So what good is he? His constituents are still looking for the beef, and dems are shilling for the so-called "most conservative leader in congress".

You got catfished.

I fought your comments because they are wrong. Your addiction to fallacy doesn’t require me to engage in fallacy with you. Sorry.
quote:

The only person that said otherwise was your strawman.


The S in SFP stands for strawman?
Why do you assume we can’t (or shouldn’t) do both?

This is a false choice fallacy
Don’t libsplain the question to me.

You said DOGE was pointless without deficit reduction. That’s an asinine statement. IDGAF if they cut every department by half. If fraud and waste exist, and it will, it should be eradicated.
Ok. You can criticize Trumps spending with complete utility.

But don’t come here and tell me that cutting waste and fraud is pointless unless we cut the deficit. We should do both.