- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bluest county east of CA seeks to eliminate single-family housing
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're relying on government to disrupt the market so that it benefits you personally
No it’s a societal question. As another poster pointed out it impacts the community more broadly and the infrastructure: schools, hospitals, services and the taxes necessary to support same.
1
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:43 pm to Ostrich
quote:
I’ll just conclude by saying, walkable towns with a limited mix of housing options, businesses, retail, etc. can be pretty nice.
FIFY
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:44 pm to 14&Counting
I'd love to see some of this in Potomac, MD....let the libs stew in their own juices...
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:44 pm to Ostrich
quote:
“The house was sold for $1.6M and they’re building three units on it. The units are $3.2M,” Elrich said. “Nobody is going to build affordable housing.”
Sounds like they’re really addressing the affordability question.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:45 pm to conservativewifeymom
The writing has been on the wall for years for CA residents. Any Christian, private sector worker, single family homeowner, Caucasian, or straight person that remains living there deserves to lose everything.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:45 pm to beaux duke
quote:
Im just not an a-hole
You refused to denounce the attempted murder of Trump.
frick off a-hole.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:47 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Rich “arse holes”. Clearly.
Ski towns are filled with rich assholes that expect their every need to be met, yet bristle at the idea of housing or better wages for the lower income workers that provide those services
Seems I struck a nerve
Again I'm certain you're not among that number and you're taking this way too personally. I replied to your msg because it was the last post
Cheers
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That doesn't really apply here. The supply is a function of government. Not the market.
I was referring to the conversation I am having with the poster about rich assholes buying mountain homes.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:50 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
So using the government to intentionally decrease people’s property values is good in your view?
Removing government, not using it.
Can't use government power if that power doesn't exist
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:50 pm to beaux duke
quote:
Ski towns are filled with rich assholes that expect their every need to be met,
And pay handsomely for it.
quote:
yet bristle at the idea of housing or better wages for the lower income workers that provide those services Seems I struck a nerve
Typical liberal projection. You’re the one melting about rich arse holes. Supply and demand has been around a long time. If you want to make more money develop skills that allow for that to happen.
quote:
Again I'm certain you're not among that number and you're taking this way too personally
Posted on 9/12/24 at 6:53 pm to Ostrich
quote:
Yes unless there’s an HOA you agreed to be a part of when purchasing the home
It’s hard to even begin to tell you how idiotic you are.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:00 pm to McLemore
Give it your best shot
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:13 pm to Ostrich
Unless you’re a libertarian or anarchist who believes in no zoning or other urban-planning codes/regs then your argument is absurd.
If you are a libertarian or anarchist you get a pass if you clarify. You may also still be an idiot, but at least potentially internally consistent and perhaps somewhat intellectually honest.
If you are a libertarian or anarchist you get a pass if you clarify. You may also still be an idiot, but at least potentially internally consistent and perhaps somewhat intellectually honest.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:14 pm to Chrome
quote:
If you bought a home in an area under the pretext of a certain zone then you absolutely should be outraged.
Anyone buying a house assuming that local zoning laws should be chisled in stone for all time is an idiot.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:15 pm to McLemore
Yeah I would consider myself a libertarian that votes GOP due to the lack of candidate viability.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:15 pm to the808bass
quote:
Sounds like they’re really addressing the affordability question.
By opening up more supply?
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:15 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
If you want to make more money develop skills that allow for that to happen.
Workers can develop all the skills they want and I hope they do. But someone's got to sweep the streets, change the sheets in the hotel, etc. The world needs ditch diggers too, and that requires low wage workers. when ski towns make housing impossible those workers will disappear
So back to the original topic instead of addressing your constant insults...
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:15 pm to conservativewifeymom
Good I hope all those people suffer for their virtue signaling
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:18 pm to Wally Sparks
quote:
By opening up more supply?
You no read good?
A $1.5M teardown turned into 3 homes each more expensive than the $1.5M house.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 7:20 pm to the808bass
quote:
You no read good?
A $1.5M teardown turned into 3 homes each more expensive than the $1.5M house.
I'm confused, are you worried about section 8 housing opening up next door or a million dollar condo?
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News