Started By
Message

re: Blackrock will own 70% of Homes in 6 years. We will own nothing.

Posted on 10/22/23 at 10:23 am to
Posted by MadQfrog
Atlanta, GA
Member since May 2021
614 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 10:23 am to
Good. Nothing wrong with capitalism.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90726 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 10:25 am to
Not my home. Own it outright and won’t sell it
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21654 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 10:44 am to
quote:

They are offering 25 to 50 percent over asking price.


Hope they buy my house.
Posted by jackamo3300
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2004
2901 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 10:57 am to
quote:

You'll own nothing and like it.


Last time we heard something similar was A. Huxley's famous quote:

There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it,...

Huxley would've approved of Agenda 21/30 enthusiastically. Only a different way of causing servitude without the need for pharmacologicals.

Wonder the role Blackrock plays within the overall vision of Agenda 21/30.

Our former State Treasurer Schroder did recommend to them that they get out the state.

Even after over 100 years, we can't seem to jettison the Bolshevik ideal of collectivist living.

They never give up.

How interesting and telling is the continuously growing New Age globalist lexicon with euphemisms such as: sustainability, holistic approach, inclusive economic development and poverty reduction, holistic approach, fusion, due diligence, strategic intelligence, cross-disciplinary approach.

The Agenda 21/regionalism plan openly targets private property. For over thirty-five years the UN has made their stance very clear on the issue of individuals owning land;

The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of society as a whole.

Land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.

Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes.

The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of society as a whole.


LINK











Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
5037 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:04 am to
quote:


Look, to all you cut throat Ayn Rand capitalist... if your system results in 75% of Americans unable to provide a roof over their head or eat decent food, then good luck with that.


At no point did Rand ever advocate for private ownership of politicians, which is the root cause, not capitalism
Posted by SalE
At the beach
Member since Jan 2020
2420 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:11 am to
I remain in the 30%
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32271 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I think BR needs to be broken up to reduce their power and influence but that's another thread.

This is what I think. But, under what US laws? And who has the guts to do it since they have so much influence and would just buy off anyone that tried (if they haven't been bought already).
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27631 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:37 am to
quote:

They are offering 25 to 50 percent over asking price.



Who do I need to call?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58919 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:38 am to
quote:

But, under what US laws?


Antitrust laws?
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24839 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:40 am to
quote:

A real government of the people would break these companies into a thousand pieces.

And a nation full of anything other than complacent, indoctrinated and sedentary citizens would break this government into a thousand pieces with extreme prejudice.

Yet, here we are. The globalists and pinkos played the long game ever since the decision to not finish off the Red army at the end of WWII, and it payed off.

We outnumber them 10,000 to 1 in the USA, and have done nothing.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32271 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Antitrust laws?

Vanguard and State Street say hello. Not an attorney but wouldn't that be a stretch without also breaking up Vanguard and State Street and probably others.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58919 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Vanguard and State Street say hello.


Ok.

quote:

but wouldn't that be a stretch without also breaking up Vanguard and State Street and probably others.


No, why would it?
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12772 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 11:53 am to
If there's blackrock, vanguard, state street, Blackstone, etc it sounds like there's plenty of competition and thus no monopoly to break up.
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
30295 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

The U.S. has good antitrust laws that once upon a time were used to break up overly large monopolistic organizations.

But when is the last time you can think of that happening? The consolidation of everything from healthcare to airlines to Amazon -- it's scary. And neither political party is doing anything about it


But they are doing something about it. They are pocketing the PAC and Lobbyist and Campaign Donation and Bribery dinero, and Insider Trading on all of it.

America isn't dying of Happenstance, it is a willful Suicide.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90726 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

By owning farmland, these investors can control the production of crops and ensure that they are getting the best return on their investment. 


Eh in my experience they don’t touch it. Used to be a lot of outside investors in catfish like this, all they did was hire someone local to manage it for them and wanted to see a profit
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9205 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:30 pm to
I don't doubt most of what you say, but I don't think things will turn out the way BlackRock expects. When things degrade enough, people will rise up.
It's happened before in 1776, and didn't work out the way those tyrants expected either
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Vanguard and State Street say hello. Not an attorney but wouldn't that be a stretch without also breaking up Vanguard and State Street and probably others.


NOT with 85% control of the S&P 500
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13269 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 3:15 pm to
Look up the good credit score fee added to home loans now.
It’s there to fund people with bad credit home loans.
Which will cause a crash eventually.
They will come in a make huge buys.

Blackrock owner Larry fink is a chairman of the world economic forum. Hes doing the ESG push too. Very scary shite.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45162 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 3:27 pm to
They won't own mine.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48639 posts
Posted on 10/22/23 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

What do you suggest we do?

I'm not hoping for this at all, but I think eventually our currency will collapse and we'll have another Civil War. Probably not in my lifetime, but perhaps in my kids' and grandkids' lifetimes.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram