re: Blackrock will own 70% of Homes in 6 years. We will own nothing.

Before the uni-party, Congress would force a breakup of these kind of monopolies.

Stop voting GOPe.

quote:

---

After looking at the numbers again, institutional ownership of sfrs is at about 20%

---

No. You’re making shite up or don’t understand. Investors own 20% percent, the vast majority being normal people and local. Large companies, aka institutional investors own about 3%.

quote:

---

consensus est for 2030 is 50%.

---

I thought it was 70, now it’s 50? What else do you want to make up?

Btw don’t let me get in the way of a good bogey man melt. Those BR finance bros find this pretty funny I’m sure.

quote:

---

Build more homes. Saturate the market.

---

They can easily control that - who, where, when..


and to the OP - Blackrock controls over 85% of the S&P500 boards

Not only does Larry Fink - its Khazarian Mafia leader - control that much of the economy here and in several places abroad; if Larry Fink were a country, he would rank 3rd in the world in GDP

and he wants more

That way he can be president of other countries as well as the USA he currently presides over..

it is a sickness - Khazarian hatred Talmud disease

quote:

---

I was told when I said this a few years ago on here I was a conspiracy nut

---

yep, our president, Larry Fink of Blackrock has armies of regulators and psychological warfare specialists in place

quote:

---

There should be an additional property tax on residential land not owned by the inhabitants.

---

isn’t that ultimately what homestead exemption is?

quote:

---

And yet people spend their days fighting over Democrat vs Republican whiles both sides fail to realize they're both fricking you over while you worship them and support your side.

---

politicians are all the same.

quote:

---

He is expressing what is happening around us . You definitely are a arse though

---

Here is the thing, the poster was right for the wrong reasons. In the historical scheme of things, even the most impoverished American is immensely wealthy.

Indeed, by any objective historical matrix, everyone participating in this thread is wealthy beyond the imagination of the average human living 100 years ago much less 1000 years ago. Yet what is the actual source of the abundant material riches we all enjoy?

Money in and of itself is not a useful indicator of true wealth. Wealth is not found in nature nor is it created by government fiat; wealth is only created by labor and the transformation of raw materials into useable goods.

True wealth only arises from using labor and raw material to create useful goods and services. Indeed, creating more money without first creating true wealth is the wellspring of the continuing crisis.

Wish they would come buy my home for 50% over asking.

We are learning a valuable lesson about the difference in conservatism and populism.

Conservatives are warmongers without regard for the general well being of the people.

To a conservative, a product made by slave labor in Vietnam is A OK if profits are maximize. He never considers the types and quantities of jobs available to American workers.

Conservatives are deftly afraid of big government but see no threat from massive corporations, which are seem as the product of a Darwinian economic evolution they call free enterprise.

The reality is corporations get big and really powerful and they then control lots of resources that they use to coop government and gain control.

Another reality is that free trade is often nothing more that exporting jobs to tyrant nations that disregard the basic human rights of workers.

Populism protects sovereignty. Populism insists that the system works for a decent plurality of its workers. Populism ensures national security by preserving manufacturing capabilites over short-term and short sighted corporate greed.
Populism advocates free markets and private ownership but recognizes that it only works within certain parameters and that too much concentration of wealth in certain companies or by certain people is just too dangerous to the people's interest.

Populism does not advocate socialism which does not work and is not just. But it does hold both the government and the corporate world accountable to the general welfare... just as it holds the individual also accountable to his lot in life