- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shreveport starts preliminary work on Loop #3
Posted on 5/28/26 at 5:38 am to Jim Rockford
Posted on 5/28/26 at 5:38 am to Jim Rockford
Sucks we’ll never have a full circle because of Barksdale.
I always wished we had another bridge across the red river that was north of 220 and not the one all the way up in Plain Dealing.
I always wished we had another bridge across the red river that was north of 220 and not the one all the way up in Plain Dealing.
1
Posted on 5/28/26 at 6:05 am to REB BEER
quote:
Industrial Loop, 3132, I-220
3132 and I-220 are part of the same partial loop, that’s not two loops. Bert Kouns is a surface street so who GAF.
If the industrial loop counts as a loop then BR has a loop with Airline Highway from I-12 to the old bridge to La 1 or 415.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 6:08 am to hg
quote:
Sucks we’ll never have a full circle because of Barksdale.
I-69 will be a decent east side bypass for out of towners coming from the east or south when it’s built 50 years from now.
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 6:19 am
Posted on 5/28/26 at 6:23 am to Fat and Happy
quote:
How in the frick does Shreveport have a 3rd loop and BR can’t get one?
Because when Kip Holden wanted a loop, the local citizens and politicians voiced disapproval, couldn't come to any agreements and therefore it was dropped.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News