Started By
Message

re: Jason Williams federal tax evasion trial starts today

Posted on 7/18/22 at 11:16 am to
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36017 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 11:16 am to
quote:

I mean you think the Judge will just sit back and allow that? 

Lawyer makes a comment or insinuates something during a line of questioning. Judge sustains an objection from the prosecutors and/or strikes the statement. It's still heard by the jurors. It would not surprise me for this to be a hung jury given the demographics of New Orleans.
Posted by FOBW
N.O.
Member since Sep 2016
299 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 12:54 pm to
Al Copeland’s attorney got his law license back, and without much delay after getting out the joint.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35309 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

It would not surprise me for this to be a hung jury given the demographics of New Orleans.


Edla is very different than cdc
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59692 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 1:01 pm to
This isn’t a New Orleans jury. There were people from about 5 different parishes in the jury pool.
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90495 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Judge sustains an objection from the prosecutors and/or strikes the statement. It's still heard by the jurors


Question for attorneys on here.

I always see this on TV. How prevalent is it that a judge asks the jurors to disregard that last statement? It's already heard and the damage is done. Do attorneys deliberately do this knowing it will be disregarded just to get it out there?

When the jurors are trying to decide guilty or not guilty, is this when it cones into play as they cant use that as a reason?

This has always bugged me
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32445 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 1:10 pm to
I'm not an attorney, but I believe if the statement is egregious enough it can be cause for a mistrial.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
47482 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:55 am to
Okay which one of you posted death threats about him?


Authorities investigating Death Threats against Jason Williams during trial

quote:

Louisiana State Police confirmed to WWL-TV that an online threat was made against Williams. A spokesperson for LSP said the agency's fusion unit discovered an online post and alerted the New Orleans Police Department and district attorney's office of the threat.

Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:58 am to
He be witch hunt
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141093 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Lawyer makes a comment or insinuates something during a line of questioning. Judge sustains an objection from the prosecutors and/or strikes the statement. It's still heard by the jurors. It would not surprise me for this to be a hung jury given the demographics of New Orleans.

if it's something that was discussed and ruled on pre-trial... and the lawyer still goes there... the judge could give the lawyer a very stern lecturing


I remember the judge in the Rittenhouse case full on yelling at the prosecutor for basically questioning Rittenhouse invoking his 5th Amendment rights during questioning and trying to use that as part of the evidence against him


if a judge thinks a lawyer is getting out of line... a good judge will immediately halt everything and admonish the lawyer in question
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
4955 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:19 pm to
It’s racist to investigate him. The ‘system’ is racist.

The prosecutors are racist. If the jurors convict him they are all racist regardless of color.

I can say this without knowing one fricking thing about the case.

I don’t need to know ANYTHING about the case. The fact that charges are being brought against him is proof of racism.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68184 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

if he's getting tried by the feds he's fricked. dont they have like a 90% + conviction rate?
Once you figure in all the Republicans, yes. The democrats are convicted at a lower rate.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66925 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:27 pm to
Soros backed prog scum. I hope he goes down.
Posted by ExtraGravy
Member since Nov 2018
794 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:28 pm to
I don't know what all the prosecution has left to present, but their first few days including their star witness looks pretty bad for them. This case isn't what it sounded like before it went to trial.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115737 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:37 pm to
Do tell.
Posted by ExtraGravy
Member since Nov 2018
794 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Do tell.


I don't have any knowledge outside of news reports and what reporters are tweeting from court. But the short version is, Williams gave all his information to the accountant, who prepared the returns for him, and even the accountant doesn't say Williams told him to lie. How do you put Williams in prison for that, unless you claim he "knew" what the guy was doing was wrong. Seems pretty hard to prove. That would be a pretty good defense for anyone charged with a tax crime. Isn't that what every businessman in America does- hand their information to their accountant who prepares the return?

Their star witness is the tax preparer, who has had to admit to a huge number of lies. He claimed, falsely, to be a CPA. He even lied to the grand jury in this case, claiming to have an accounting degree which he doesn't. He claimed to be a CPA as part of some unrelated fraud scheme he isn't being prosecuted for. He admitted to continuing to file fraudulent returns for himself, even after the IRS started investigating him, and after Williams was no longer his client. At one point he was asked what he was thinking when he filed false tax returns and he said "I wasn't thinking." He was allowed to plead guilty to only one crime, despite having 1,500 other clients who he probably did the same thing for. But even he can't say that Williams ever told him to lie, or take a false deduction, or failed to give him all the information needed to report his income.

One thing in the openings that sounded bad for Williams was when the government talked about them having lots of cash income in his office. You can get busted for that if you don't report it. But, the prosecutors also didn't talk like they really had the goods on Williams for not reporting it all, such as having bank deposit slips or something. So, we will see. It just sounded like if they get him on anything it may be the cash.

We will see.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115737 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 1:42 pm to
I heard about the accountant lying about being a CPA, and I agree that hurts a little.

From what I understand, everyone is going to testify that JW knew about the scheme though. It also hurts a lot when someone is an attorney and as "sophisticated" as JW. That can be used against you. Often times "should have known" is treated the same as if you did know.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28326 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 1:45 pm to
Hmm. From what I was reading, limited to live tweets on WDSU, (so not reliable necessarily), Timothy said Williams was not happy with the original tax returns and wanted them amended, Williams/Burdette provided the P&Ls used to amend the returns and Burdette asked him to increase the expenses, among other things. He testified as to being pressured by them and that Burdett would sometimes not accept returns and send back.

Seems like could be some issue between Williams and Burdette, as she appears to be more directly involved in interactions with Timothy.

Posted by ExtraGravy
Member since Nov 2018
794 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 1:50 pm to
it sounds like there is a bit of a better case against Burdette than Williams since Burdette was the one dealing with the accountant all the time.
Posted by Saskwatch
Member since Feb 2016
16550 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

I heard about the accountant lying about being a CPA, and I agree that hurts a little


quote:

Often times "should have known" is treated the same as if you did know.


I don't understand how a high earning attorney finds this guy in Westwego and utilizes him for personal and business tax? It reeks of JW knowing that if this is exposed they can use all of this guy's poor representations and vices to make a case he is a fraud later.

Do my bidding because I can make you out to be a bigger scumbag than me at a later date
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 1:53 pm
Posted by Big Jim Slade
Member since Oct 2016
4928 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 1:57 pm to
The tax preparer seems to have done a poor job on the stand, but the prosecutors had to have known that going in. I would think there will be other witnesses to hammer home the fact that JW knew that this tax guy was fraudulent and that he went to him to save significantly on taxes, not for actual legit tax advice. Two lawyers from his office are taking the stand along with JWs ex wife, and all have pled guilty to tax charges. I’d imagine they are going to say that they all went to this tax guy who will just enter whatever you give him, no questions asked. They’ll probably prove intent. The female law partner seems to have known the tax prep guy and was at the center of all of it.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram