- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Godspeed the crew of Artemis II...Re-Entry takes place tonight
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:56 pm to MoarKilometers
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:56 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Dude had almost 0 to do with this event
Ok pal. Keep believing that. Old admins would have pushed back launch as far as possible or even scrubbed this mission completely. He's pushed the teams to work harder, faster, including the program partners. If you don't know anything, stay quiet.
This post was edited on 4/1/26 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:56 pm to LegendInMyMind
I’m beyond pissed I didn’t get to see it lift off. At least it’s just a flyby mission and not the real one.
It was a black screen after ignition and then the feed came back and the camera man was drunk and dropped the camera and had to lift up the lens and find the rocket.
It was a black screen after ignition and then the feed came back and the camera man was drunk and dropped the camera and had to lift up the lens and find the rocket.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:56 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Who the frick is this new Black Science Guy ABC found?
A fraud.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:56 pm to Volvagia
Goosebumps and minor cut up onions over here. This thing is awesome.
It's truly absurd that they did this shite in the 60s.
It's truly absurd that they did this shite in the 60s.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:57 pm to GEAUXLPOST
quote:
We take for granted how efficient SpaceX is at doing this.
Artemis didn't explode.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:57 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
You seem to be under the impression that the shape of a space craft impacts how it flies through space.
Whatever. I've seen how much better the shuttle flies in space in Armageddon.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:58 pm to putt23
quote:
What's the difference between sending the butt plug up as opposed to a shuttle?
The butt plug design is for deep space.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 5:59 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Artemis didn't explode.
SpaceX accounts for that as part of the development process. Their willingness to fail is why they've done in 10 years what took NASA 60.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:00 pm to putt23
quote:
Is this thing like a shuttle and they just fly it back, or is it just on a trajectory the entire time and falls back to Earth?
It’ll be like Apollo. Right now most of life support and power is on a side module that will be jettisoned before reentry.
It’ll “land” off the Pacific coast and be recovered by the Navy.
It’s actually a decent step back from capability and functionality from the shuttle honestly. Most of the shuttle’s size was for a cavernous cargo bay that can carry things to put in orbit. Or even pick it up and return to earth (although I dunno if that ability was ever used). It also had a massive robotic arm to move things around.
It was the workhorse that made building the space station possible.
Orion is just a cramped coffin that you just sit in.
330 cubic feet of space for 4 people vs 2600 for seven.
Even the shuttle was fairly cramped but that’s luxurious by comparison.
This post was edited on 4/1/26 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:01 pm to Btrtigerfan
quote:
The butt plug design is for deep space.
Exactly, specially designed to evade the klingons
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:01 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
You seem to be under the impression that the shape of a space craft impacts how it flies through space.
Wasn't under the impression of anything. I just didn't know the differences between the two.
I understand they fly them, but I didn't realize why or when they use one or the other.
I guess the way I asked about trajectory through off my question a little.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:02 pm to RollTide1987
these visuals suck, what year is it?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:02 pm to Centinel
quote:
Whatever. I've seen how much better the shuttle flies in space in Armageddon.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:02 pm to DVinBR
Wait. Thats not a selfie stick getting that?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:02 pm to Boss13
Approximately 101 miles away in Plant City.


Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:03 pm to DVinBR
So how long until it gets to the moon? Couple hours?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:03 pm to DVinBR
quote:
these visuals suck, what year is it?
Yeah, I miss the onboard camera view from the SpaceX launches.
Prob dont have cameras because they dont want anyone to see the ice wall.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 6:04 pm to Volvagia
quote:
330 cubic feet of space for 4 people
Not gonna lie, this gives me claustrophobia. And I'm not usually bothered by that. That's crazy cramped.
Popular
Back to top



1












