Started By
Message

re: Deputies arrest 4 in LSU student Madison Brooks case

Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:17 am to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89201 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:17 am to
quote:

If what I was told is true, the videos show a different story.

If my "source" is right....




Either make your claim or frick off with this smoke and mirrors bullshite.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179388 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:18 am to
quote:

maybe you are the one running his mouth who doesn't know shite about it?


negative. i'm asking questions that haven't been answered publicly. And the continued civil liability and investigation process is a part of this continued case, not just criminal liability.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35990 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:18 am to
quote:

horseshoe theory rings true again as LSU student group of feminists and democrats agree with us that Tate's response blaming it on underage drinking is chicken shite


I said his statement was bullshite immediately. Many posters were praising his strong response, lol
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
49074 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:19 am to
Here's the Facebook link to the podcast that the young girl commented under.
Unspeakable Crime Podcast Facebook Page
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35990 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Videos show different sides of her and the guys.

Regardless, it's a terrible situation. But the guys may not be the scumbags we thought.



Well the DA has seen the video and is looking to INCREASE the charges.

Is the NAACP paying you to post here?
Posted by 92Tiger
Member since Dec 2015
618 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:22 am to
LINK

UK Daily Mail current top headline is about the underage antics at Reggies. Reggies is so effed.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90328 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:22 am to
quote:

If what I was told is true, the videos show a different story.

If my "source" is right....


You cant consent when you are drunk. Which is why its 3rd degree rape.

These dudes filmed themselves fricking a drunk girl then dumped her on the side of the road and she ends up dead.

Nothing they have makes any of this okay.
This post was edited on 1/25/23 at 10:24 am
Posted by windmill
Prairieville, La
Member since Dec 2005
7820 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:23 am to
21 drinking age is ridiculous and should be changed back to 18“

This does not matter at all. The reality is that the legal age is 21 for drinking.
Deal with reality and not what you think reality should be.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41776 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:24 am to
quote:


However, some on this board are implying that a white sorority girl would never bang a black guy. That is silly.


If you have to keep the goalpost on a dolly, you might want to reconsider your argument.
Posted by TankBoys32
Member since Mar 2019
4263 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:25 am to
That lawyer is the scum of the earth for saying she was coherent and consent when her BAC was .3 hours AFTER the crimes were committed:
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
123607 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:25 am to
Isn’t sixth a mover and shaker? Or just a pathetic person?
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90328 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Here's the Facebook link to the podcast that the young girl commented under.
Unspeakable Crime Podcast Facebook Page


So basically, this dude is a predator.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90328 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:26 am to
quote:

SixthAndBarone


is sticking up for a sexual predator and needs his arse beat.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179388 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:27 am to
i wanna know who the 17 yr old is. once charged as an adult, his privacy rights should get fricked.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41776 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:27 am to
quote:

If he was speeding, then sorry, there is blame to share. He's certainly not in the clear of any civil action.


This is worse than suing the manufacturer of a gun that was used in a shooting.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
38114 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Isn’t sixth a mover and shaker? Or just a pathetic person?


maybe he had dinner at Supper Club?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179388 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:28 am to
quote:

This is worse than suing the manufacturer of a gun that was used in a shooting.



not even close. you should feel fricking embarassed that's the level you took that discussion point to. When you kill someone with your car, obeying speed limit laws are pretty fricking important.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
38013 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Well the DA has seen the video and is looking to INCREASE the charges.


Stand strong hillar.

Posted by MyNameIsNobody
Member since Dec 2013
1223 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:29 am to
quote:


If what I was told is true, the videos show a different story.

If my "source" is right....




Your sauce has failed the bar exam more than one. There is video of her stumbling around and falling in and outside of the bar. Toxicology reports? Is there video that those are faked and you are saying that she wasn't drunk? It does not matter what she says in the video just prior to her having sex. The law is clear.

quote:

§43. Third degree rape A. Third degree rape is a rape committed when the anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse is deemed to be without the lawful consent of a victim because it is committed under any one or more of the following circumstances: (1) When the victim is incapable of resisting or of understanding the nature of the act by reason of a stupor or abnormal condition of mind produced by an intoxicating agent or any cause and the offender knew or should have known of the victim's incapacity. (2) When the victim, through unsoundness of mind, is temporarily or permanently incapable of understanding the nature of the act and the offender knew or should have known of the victim's incapacity. (3) When the victim submits under the belief that the person committing the act is someone known to the victim, other than the offender, and such belief is intentionally induced by any artifice, pretense, or concealment practiced by the offender. (4) When the offender acts without the consent of the victim. B. Whoever commits the crime of third degree rape shall be imprisoned at hard labor, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, for not more than twenty-five years. C. For all purposes, "simple rape" and "third degree rape" mean the offense defined by the provisions of this Section and any reference to the crime of simple rape is the same as a reference to the crime of third degree rape. Any act in violation of the provisions of this Section committed on or after August 1, 2015, shall be referred to as "third degree rape". Acts 1978, No. 239, §1; Acts 1990, No. 722, §1; Acts 1995, No. 946, §2; Acts 1997, No. 862, §1; Acts 2001, No. 131, §1; Acts 2001, No. 301, §1; Acts 2003, No. 232, §1; Acts 2003, No. 759, §1; Acts 2010, No. 359, §1; Acts 2015, No. 184, §1; Acts 2015, No. 256, §1.
.

I can assume that people are assuming that First degree Rape may also be charged because of this, what is in bold.

quote:

NOTE: This provision of law was included in the Unconstitutional Statutes Biennial Report to the Legislature, dated March 14, 2016. §42. First degree rape A. First degree rape is a rape committed upon a person sixty-five years of age or older or where the anal, oral, or vaginal sexual intercourse is deemed to be without lawful consent of the victim because it is committed under any one or more of the following circumstances: (1) When the victim resists the act to the utmost, but whose resistance is overcome by force.
(2) When the victim is prevented from resisting the act by threats of great and immediate bodily harm, accompanied by apparent power of execution.
(3) When the victim is prevented from resisting the act because the offender is armed with a dangerous weapon.
(4) When the victim is under the age of thirteen years. Lack of knowledge of the victim's age shall not be a defense.
(5) When two or more offenders participated in the act. (6) When the victim is prevented from resisting the act because the victim is a person with a disability.


Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77518 posts
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:30 am to
quote:

not even close. you should feel fricking embarassed that's the level you took that discussion point to. When you kill someone with your car, obeying speed limit laws are pretty fricking important.
He has been cleared of any wrongdoing.

Do you have evidence that he was speeding?

What are you basing your claims on?
This post was edited on 1/25/23 at 10:31 am
Jump to page
Page First 104 105 106 107 108 ... 419
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 106 of 419Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram