2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clancy trial verdict predictions
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:32 pm to HouseMom
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:32 pm to HouseMom
quote:
This is what her own husband said about her four days after she strangled his children to death.
Who gives a shite? Her being the best wife and mother in recorded history ceases to mean anything the moment she murders her kids.
Additionally, the husband is suing the doctors and drug companies, so blaming her for this doesn't help his financial cause.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:34 pm to ShrimperDan
quote:
When has any family member in any kind of true crime scenario been like "Oh yeah, I definitely saw it coming. They were bound to kill their kids eventually". Literally never happens.
I hear ya, but this chick told her husband she had thoughts of hurting the kids prior to all this going down.
Just another thing showing premeditation imo. Selfish enough to have these thoughts and not seek help out of fear of being away from her kids.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:34 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Has the judge given the dynamite charge yet
What is that one?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:34 pm to HouseMom
quote:This the same husband that TikTok had you positing as the real killer?
This is what her own husband said about her four days after she strangled his children to death. Again, I don't know this lady.
quote:
I was purposefully avoiding reading about this case, but now I'm down the rabbit hole with you.
This lady is clearly out of her mind, but it would be wild if the husband did it and framed her. He wouldn't have expected her to survive falling out of the window.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:35 pm to HouseMom
quote:
This is what her own husband said about her four days after she strangled his children to death. Again, I don't know this lady.
I don’t know what this proves other than her husband is a psycho too
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:35 pm to HouseMom
quote:Yea, Lindsey Clancy is a dindu.
This is what her own husband said about her four days after she strangled his children to death. Again, I don't know this lady.
We know.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:37 pm to HouseMom
Let me make this easier for you since you can't seem to answer the question.....intentionally killing your own kids makes you categorically a bad parent and a bad person.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:37 pm to Scruffy
0% chance shes convicted. There are Karens on that jury that would rather die than convict her.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:38 pm to HouseMom
quote:
All I wish for her now is that she can somehow find peace.
In the afterlife. I honestly don’t know how the husband didn’t kill her when it all went down. I’d lose my damn mind.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:38 pm to DrrTiger
quote:See, this is actually you being very emotional
Who gives a shite? Her being the best wife and mother in recorded history ceases to mean anything the moment she murders her kids.
It says a lot. Some of y’all want to use the emotion of anger just as much as any female is using their emotions right now
The written law of Mass has insanity not only as a defense, but as states the burden of proof lies on the state
You can hate the law all you want, but that’s the law.
How Clancy acted during “normal” times is actually very important to the trial and case
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:40 pm to Scruffy
quote:The only thing the TikTok crowd has been consistent on is that Lindsey in no way can bear any responsibility at all for what happened.
Yea, Lindsey Clancy is a dindu.
We know.
1. First, she was failed by her family and husband. (actually she had a nanny and he stayed home to help)
2. Then, maybe it was really the husband who did it! (literally nobody surrounding this trial has ever hinted as such)
3. Ok, ok, next it was the doctors who were individually and collectively responsible; they should know better than to medicate someone asking for medication (though she clearly hid from them her thoughts of infanticide)
4. Well, society is responsible for not centering PPD and PPP
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:41 pm to TideCPA
And the only thing this board has really argued is that the law is shite (which I agree with)
If you even try and discuss insanity people here lose their fricking mind(no pun intended)
You are usually hit with “who cares if she was insane?!!!”
If you even try and discuss insanity people here lose their fricking mind(no pun intended)
You are usually hit with “who cares if she was insane?!!!”
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:46 pm to lsupride87
Clancy isn’t insane. She’s never been insane. She’s a run of the mill psychopath.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:48 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Got it. Thanks.
Am I reading Massachusetts law right that he cannot send them back twice?
I believe he can't send them back more than twice without the agreement of the jury. Not sure how that works.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:49 pm to B747Tiger
That’s fine. I believe based on all evidence and the trial it’s reasonable to believe she was insane . I think it’s 50/50
Doesn’t mean I don’t want her to go to jail, doesn’t mean I don’t think she is a monster, etc. The state didnt come close to proving to me beyond all reasonable doubt she wasn’t insane
At times it actually felt like the state was trying to prove she was kinda insane …
Doesn’t mean I don’t want her to go to jail, doesn’t mean I don’t think she is a monster, etc. The state didnt come close to proving to me beyond all reasonable doubt she wasn’t insane
At times it actually felt like the state was trying to prove she was kinda insane …
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:49 pm to DrrTiger
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:50 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You are usually hit with “who cares if she was insane?!!!”
So insane she can plan out a window of opportunity to kill three children while sending her husband away, conduct a phone call in the middle of it, and then immediately ask for a lawyer when she wakes up in the hospital.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:50 pm to lsupride87
If she was insane then so is every other murderer in the history of murder. As a matter of fact, any time a husband comes home from a bad day and work and beats his wife because the house wasn’t clean then that’s temporary insanity too.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:51 pm to DrrTiger
No doctor seemed to argue insane people can’t plan 
In fact just the opposite seemed to be established. That people with extreme delusions and even schizophrenia can have elaborate plans etc while having episodes
In fact just the opposite seemed to be established. That people with extreme delusions and even schizophrenia can have elaborate plans etc while having episodes This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:53 pm to B747Tiger
This broad needs the Leo Frank treatment.
Page 16 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News