2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:37 pm to HouseMom
Let me make this easier for you since you can't seem to answer the question.....intentionally killing your own kids makes you categorically a bad parent and a bad person.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:37 pm to Scruffy
0% chance shes convicted. There are Karens on that jury that would rather die than convict her.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:38 pm to HouseMom
quote:
All I wish for her now is that she can somehow find peace.
In the afterlife. I honestly don’t know how the husband didn’t kill her when it all went down. I’d lose my damn mind.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:38 pm to DrrTiger
quote:See, this is actually you being very emotional
Who gives a shite? Her being the best wife and mother in recorded history ceases to mean anything the moment she murders her kids.
It says a lot. Some of y’all want to use the emotion of anger just as much as any female is using their emotions right now
The written law of Mass has insanity not only as a defense, but as states the burden of proof lies on the state
You can hate the law all you want, but that’s the law.
How Clancy acted during “normal” times is actually very important to the trial and case
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:40 pm to Scruffy
quote:The only thing the TikTok crowd has been consistent on is that Lindsey in no way can bear any responsibility at all for what happened.
Yea, Lindsey Clancy is a dindu.
We know.
1. First, she was failed by her family and husband. (actually she had a nanny and he stayed home to help)
2. Then, maybe it was really the husband who did it! (literally nobody surrounding this trial has ever hinted as such)
3. Ok, ok, next it was the doctors who were individually and collectively responsible; they should know better than to medicate someone asking for medication (though she clearly hid from them her thoughts of infanticide)
4. Well, society is responsible for not centering PPD and PPP
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:41 pm to TideCPA
And the only thing this board has really argued is that the law is shite (which I agree with)
If you even try and discuss insanity people here lose their fricking mind(no pun intended)
You are usually hit with “who cares if she was insane?!!!”
If you even try and discuss insanity people here lose their fricking mind(no pun intended)
You are usually hit with “who cares if she was insane?!!!”
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:46 pm to lsupride87
Clancy isn’t insane. She’s never been insane. She’s a run of the mill psychopath.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:48 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Got it. Thanks.
Am I reading Massachusetts law right that he cannot send them back twice?
I believe he can't send them back more than twice without the agreement of the jury. Not sure how that works.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:49 pm to B747Tiger
That’s fine. I believe based on all evidence and the trial it’s reasonable to believe she was insane . I think it’s 50/50
Doesn’t mean I don’t want her to go to jail, doesn’t mean I don’t think she is a monster, etc. The state didnt come close to proving to me beyond all reasonable doubt she wasn’t insane
At times it actually felt like the state was trying to prove she was kinda insane …
Doesn’t mean I don’t want her to go to jail, doesn’t mean I don’t think she is a monster, etc. The state didnt come close to proving to me beyond all reasonable doubt she wasn’t insane
At times it actually felt like the state was trying to prove she was kinda insane …
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:49 pm to DrrTiger
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:50 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You are usually hit with “who cares if she was insane?!!!”
So insane she can plan out a window of opportunity to kill three children while sending her husband away, conduct a phone call in the middle of it, and then immediately ask for a lawyer when she wakes up in the hospital.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:50 pm to lsupride87
If she was insane then so is every other murderer in the history of murder. As a matter of fact, any time a husband comes home from a bad day and work and beats his wife because the house wasn’t clean then that’s temporary insanity too.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:51 pm to DrrTiger
No doctor seemed to argue insane people can’t plan 
In fact just the opposite seemed to be established. That people with extreme delusions and even schizophrenia can have elaborate plans etc while having episodes
In fact just the opposite seemed to be established. That people with extreme delusions and even schizophrenia can have elaborate plans etc while having episodes This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:55 pm to lsupride87
quote:
No doctor seemed to argue insane people can’t plan In fact just the opposite seemed to be established. That people with extreme delusions and even schizophrenia can have elaborate plans etc while having episodes
The doctors are wrong.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:00 pm to Big Fat Guy
quote:
The women who support Lindsay Clancy are the same ones who have TDS. Women have crossed the Rubicon with this one though. Saying they shouldn't be allowed to vote or that they don't belong in the workplace might have seemed a bit extreme, but now with a huge percentage of them actively supporting a woman who admitted to murdering her kids, everything has to be reconsidered. You can't have men and women both voting when one side might have to be drafted to fight in wars and the other side doesn't, yet still gets to vote on it. It's as if some of them vote for things just to spite men.
Yeah. The MDS (MALE Derangement Syndrome) these women are spreading around to each other over the internet, is going epic scale. And this case has turned many of them into frothing crazed dogs
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:00 pm to Lazy But Talented
quote:
this chick told her husband she had thoughts of hurting the kids prior to all this going down
Off topic, but what would you do if your wife told you that?
I would have gotten her arse away from the kids.
Not trying to exonerate her or blame him. I am just saying that is what I would do. NFW I leave her alone with them until I am sure she is back on solid ground.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:01 pm to B747Tiger
quote:
The doctors are wrong.
Just because you’re crazy doesn’t mean you lose all intellect. Most crazy people I’ve been around seem to be incredibly ingenious about pulling their stunts.
I’m not saying this woman is innocent by any means. However, I do think she has to be bat shite crazy. She definitely needs to be in a mental institution for the rest of her life.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:03 pm to lsupride87
quote:My issue with all of this has more to do with the external, social component.
And the only thing this board has really argued is that the law is shite (which I agree with)
The actual outcome of the trial for those involved directly has no grand impact on anything.
The issue is the social and gender-related tribalism that is coming forth.
The ideas of raising over $1 million for a child murderer, calls for empathy and sympathy for the child murderer, the, once again, screeching of how women are simply neglected and ignored in society, etc.
And you place that on top of the already massive gap in male and female sociopolitical viewpoints, and you have a recipe for disaster.
You could have a discussion about PPD and PPP (two concepts which are in no way ignored or neglected in modern society) while justifiably recognizing that this woman should be shot out of a cannon in to orbit.
Instead we have women treating the defense attorney like he is Jesus Christ and I expect there will be candles with Clancy’s picture on them soon enough.
And, despite arguments to the contrary, the size of the group of women who support Clancy getting off is not small.
This is a gender-based OJ trial.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 1:03 pm to sabbertooth
quote:
However, I do think she has to be bat shite crazy.
That’s just a baseline woman tho
Page 16 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News