
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:48 am to LegendInMyMind
Even worse. You are correct. NINE lib women. Are they wearing pink today too?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:51 am to tiggerthetooth
Has the judge given the dynamite charge yet?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:54 am to OlGrandad
quote:
Probably every woman on the jury is describing that time they were depressed and how they understand what the defendant went through.
If so, one of the men should ask them if they strangled their children to death?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:55 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
Has the judge given the dynamite charge yet?
Tuey Rodriguez was not given yet, very likely next time they come back deadlocked.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:58 am to SCLibertarian
quote:The thing that gets me about Belle and others on here is that they are part of the group who will be most affected socially by the massive gender divide over Clancy.
American women, on the other hand, claim to be equal to or better than men at everything and yet think some sort of hormonal imbalance justifies the premeditated murder of 3 kids. Which is it? Are you a strong and independent woman or are you someone so weak that you cannot accept agency or accountability for your actions?
Throughout history, men, by and large, recognize that unjustified violence towards others should be dealt with appropriately, no matter the gender or mental state.
Women, on the other hand, have largely had a softer view, especially when other women are involved.
This case though…hell…
We now have massive swathes of women arguing that a “bad day and emotional state”excuses an action.
We have large groups of the female gender arguing that they are simply one bad day from a potential infanticide, and they empathize with this.
That is essentially the same viewpoint of the 1900s psychiatrists who would commit women for their emotional state.
So, we now have a contradicting viewpoint of “women should be in positions of power” and “women can’t regulate their mental/emotional state”.
That is a world I do not want my wife, who doesn’t believe any of the Clancy nonsense, and daughter to live in.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:59 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
Tuey Rodriguez was not given yet, very likely next time they come back deadlocked.
Got it. Thanks.
Am I reading Massachusetts law right that he cannot send them back twice?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:00 pm to Scruffy
quote:This is just factually incorrect historically
Throughout history, men, by and large, recognize that unjustified violence towards others should be dealt with appropriately, no matter the gender or mental state. Women, on the other hand, have largely had a softer view, especially when other women are involved.
Women have been far harsher on other women with punishment than men are. Men are the ones that have let women off far more times than other women have
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:01 pm to lsupride87
If the jurors have post partum depression they will likely give her the chair.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:04 pm to DrrTiger
quote:
Women look at why the crime was committed.
Well, go take it up with the great state of Massachusetts. An insanity defense is allowable on their books and part of this case.
quote:
That way they can inject their emotions and feelings into the case.
This particular thread proves quite the opposite. I'm trying to talk about what actually happened in the trial, and I'm apparently a big liberal Lindsay Clancy supporter now.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:04 pm to Scruffy
quote:
That is essentially the same viewpoint of the 1900s psychiatrists who would commit women for their emotional state.
WasThatWrong.gif
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:06 pm to HouseMom
quote:
This particular thread proves quite the opposite. I'm trying to talk about what actually happened in the trial, and I'm apparently a big liberal Lindsay Clancy supporter now.
Lmao at the "I'm just trying to talk about it" chick who literally a page ago couldn't answer a question about something she herself said without crying about it
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:08 pm to HouseMom
quote:
I'm trying to talk about what actually happened in the trial
If you watched the trial ... then you realize the defense testified "My client killed her kids" ...
So your whataboutism regarding Patrick Clancy rabbit holes is proof that you are either lying about watching the trial or are just a dishonest troll in this thread ...
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:10 pm to lsupride87
quote:Generally only in cases of sexual assault, domestic violence, and child abuse does that play out, but that was in all cases of all genders, although meta-analyses do show that participant type (defendant gender, race, etc.) has less of an impact that other factors like socioeconomic factors.
Women have been far harsher on other women with punishment than men.
This case is kinda starting to limit the view that “violence towards children” will fit in that group.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:12 pm to Scruffy
This case , to me, speaks more to AI algorithms with social media than anything else
I see some foolish statements and acting from both sides of the aisle due to this IMHO
I see some foolish statements and acting from both sides of the aisle due to this IMHO
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:19 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I see some foolish statements and acting from both sides of the aisle due to this IMHO
Well one side would just like people who kill kids to be punished for it
Saying things like "women shouldn't be able to vote if she is found not guilty" is just taking the other side's logic to its obvious conclusion. We (or at least I) don't actually believe that.... people are able to control themselves. Millions of women per year deal with PPD and don't kill their kids.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:22 pm to HouseMom
quote:
I'm apparently a big liberal Lindsay Clancy supporter now
You called her a sweet and exceptional mom. A literal child murderer. Your words.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:22 pm to Scruffy
Women today have it easier than every generation before them and yet suffer from more mental illness than ever before. Our mothers and grandmothers had significantly harder and busier lives and they just got through it. The average woman today watches her roomba clean her house while waiting on her doordash order all while sitting on the sofa and scrolling social media. An idle mind is a dangerous mind.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:27 pm to ShrimperDan
quote:
Lmao at the "I'm just trying to talk about it" chick who literally a page ago couldn't answer a question about something she herself said without crying about it
Okay. I'm done with this topic, but here's Patrick's statement to the press 4 days after the murders.
Patrick Clancy's Statement to the Press: January 28, 2023
quote:
I want to share some thoughts about Lindsay. She’s recently been portrayed largely by people who have never met her and never knew who the real Lindsay was. Our marriage was wonderful and diametrically grew stronger as her condition rapidly worsened. I took as much pride in being her husband as I did in being a father and felt persistently lucky to have her in my life.
quote:
I want to ask all of you that you find it deep within yourselves to forgive Lindsay, as I have. The real Lindsay was generously loving and caring towards everyone - me, our kids, family, friends, and her patients. The very fibers of her soul are loving. All I wish for her now is that she can somehow find peace.
This is what her own husband said about her four days after she strangled his children to death. Again, I don't know this lady.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 12:32 pm to HouseMom
I mean it is EXTREMELY common for people close to murderers to do that.
When has any family member in any kind of true crime scenario been like "Oh yeah, I definitely saw it coming. They were bound to kill their kids eventually". Literally never happens.
And he could be telling the truth and that statement be 100% accurate. I just don't think we can draw any conclusions from it.
When has any family member in any kind of true crime scenario been like "Oh yeah, I definitely saw it coming. They were bound to kill their kids eventually". Literally never happens.
And he could be telling the truth and that statement be 100% accurate. I just don't think we can draw any conclusions from it.

Popular
Back to top



0










