- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: C-P starting the legal process to stop SG
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:34 pm to teke184
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:34 pm to teke184
Ahh yes, the civil right of taxation without representation. Just what our founding fathers desires when they laid down and accepted their taxes paying for bridges and committee meetings in London.
0
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:09 pm to Rattlehead82
quote:
So is this just how elections work now? Cry, start investigations, sue, riot etc. if your side lost?
Right up until the point the armed rebellion starts.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:13 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
I'm surprised it took this long.
It ensures that JBE will not have to name the city's first officials until after the election. He can then frick St. George as hard as he wants with his appointments with zero blowback because the election will have already been settled one way or the other.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:21 pm to TigerstuckinMS
Good news is that one side can’t hit anything because they will have the gun sideways.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 11:27 pm to NPComb
quote:
Mary Olive Pierson is doing work for Mayor SWB pro-bono - Why would that be? Ugly bitch probably shares DNA with Soros
True story, she once had a "meat pie" restaurant on Government at Foster called MOPS.
Posted on 10/25/19 at 4:44 am to doubleb
This is what happens when black folks realize they are losing white people’s money.
Posted on 10/25/19 at 5:14 am to doubleb
Are they not proving the reasons why the City Parish form of government does not truly represent the unincorporated parish along with the other cities?
Are they not proving BR is taking everyone else’s money to balance its budget?
There should be a lawsuit proving this form of government is not representing the unincorporated areas along with the other cities equally.
Are they not proving BR is taking everyone else’s money to balance its budget?
There should be a lawsuit proving this form of government is not representing the unincorporated areas along with the other cities equally.
This post was edited on 10/25/19 at 5:15 am
Posted on 10/25/19 at 5:24 am to doubleb
If I send them an email about my ditch was promised to be cleaned with a work order and now it is not being cleaned.
Would that show up in the lawsuit?
Would the court force EBRP DPW to clean it in the next 50 years since it has a work order?
Would that show up in the lawsuit?
Would the court force EBRP DPW to clean it in the next 50 years since it has a work order?
Posted on 10/25/19 at 5:50 am to doubleb
Could St George show how BR excluded residential areas since the early 1980’s by annexing businesses while not annexing the neighborhoods around it?
Florida Blvd East where they took in Florida Blvd while excluding River Oaks due to a past council man did not want to pay city taxes who lived in the neighborhood.
Florida Blvd East where they took in Florida Blvd while excluding River Oaks due to a past council man did not want to pay city taxes who lived in the neighborhood.
Posted on 10/25/19 at 6:48 am to NPComb
Damn, that’s the lady from Throw Mama Off The Train?!?
Posted on 10/25/19 at 7:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
yes. it's a spoliation letter. if these documents become an issue in discovery and they've been lost/destroyed, you will have a bad day. if you don't send a notice, it's possible they can claim they didn't anticipate litigation prior to being served, which will excuse the behavior sometimes
It can even make your day long and aggravating if the documents were destroyed prior to receiving the notice. It’s partially why some larger companies use third parties at times to destroy document (besides the manpower issues). Then you have documented dates by a third party.
I think it can still get dicey if the court feels you did that in anticipation of the litigation but I am not a lawyer, just been through a similar situation so I may have this a little twisted.
Posted on 10/25/19 at 7:53 am to mdomingue
quote:
if the documents were destroyed prior to receiving the notice.
oh the last word of that quote is "sometimes" for a reason
Posted on 10/25/19 at 8:09 am to SlowFlowPro
Chris Paul needs to focus on stopping the PG, let mo pete handle the SG
Posted on 10/25/19 at 8:14 am to doubleb
Impeach Saint Gauwj!
Posted on 10/25/19 at 8:32 am to johnnyrocket
They don’t do “dishes”
Posted on 10/25/19 at 8:47 am to teke184
quote:
They have an argument that incorporating SG hurts BR.
They're going to have a hard time with that argument. SG is only keeping less than 5% of the total City Parish budget.
Posted on 10/25/19 at 8:57 am to johnnyrocket
quote:
Florida Blvd East where they took in Florida Blvd while excluding River Oaks due to a past council man did not want to pay city taxes who lived in the neighborhood.
Do you think River Oaks will try to annex into St. George?
Posted on 10/25/19 at 8:58 am to tommy2tone1999
I didn’t say it was a GOOD argument.
Basically, BR can’t budget for shite and has been using the money from the unincorporated parts of the parish, mainly St George, to balance those budgets.
Them making that argument also opens the counter-argument that the city-parish merger is a fraud because it means BR is using all non-BR areas as tax colonies to balance their own budget.
Basically, BR can’t budget for shite and has been using the money from the unincorporated parts of the parish, mainly St George, to balance those budgets.
Them making that argument also opens the counter-argument that the city-parish merger is a fraud because it means BR is using all non-BR areas as tax colonies to balance their own budget.
Posted on 10/25/19 at 8:59 am to tommy2tone1999
quote:
They're going to have a hard time with that argument. SG is only keeping less than 5% of the total City Parish budget.
We need to make it public all the individuals who are suing to stop SG, they shouldn’t be allowed to hide behind Broome and the C-P government.
What happened to MOP’s pledge to work for the city pro bono? Did she overload her self?
Posted on 10/25/19 at 9:00 am to doubleb
I hope this whole thing backfires in BR's face and the city must repay millions to the StG area for money stolen to provide for the city of BR.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News