mdomingue

quote:

---

Not really.

---

Interesting that you say this but don't stop there.

Instead you post:

quote:

---

It's just hilarious listening to comments like "dadgummit, I wandah if ole Lane has done gone and found Jay ta fine out what it takes to be a champeen."

---

Which I did not see anyone say before your original post

quote:

---

As if Kiffin hasn't coached for the goat of a HIGHLY COMPETITIVE sport where every college has the desire to win in. College basketball is the same.

Not college baseball, where only a handful of west coast schools and ONE major school (LSU) are actually trying to win at.

---

Sounds like you're just reenforcing my point.

quote:

---

Do any of you actually think we'd dominate this sport if all the major schools took it seriously like we do?

---

If we win a few more, we are dominating. Right now, we are just in the upper echelon, like we are in many sports. I'm also curious why you think other SEC schools that are also very good from year to year don't take it seriously.

quote:

---

Step back and listen to it. It's pretty entertaining

---

In large measure because of you triggered football baws :lol:

My recollection of the time was that he had some nagging injuries and decided it was not worth the toll on his body to play football anymore, especially with his brother getting generational wealth from the NFL and probably offering to take care of him going forward.

Of course, that was all speculation, as well.

quote:

---

McMahon was living off finding an unknown Ja Morant playing a pick up game in a South Carolina church gym.

---

That and winning 30 games without Morant.

He was a hot name, he is a good but not great mid-major coach, he sucks in the SEC, and LSU needs to move on.

All of those things can be true. I never get why people try to revise history because they don't like someone or an outcome.

quote:

---

quote:

---

What is wrong with you people?

---

^^ This.

---

Wasn't this the same guy posting links all over the game thread?

quote:

---

quote:

---

97 runs through 8 games

---

quote:

---

97

---

won a Natty that year

quote:

---

8

---

total number of titles (so far)



sounds like Destiny

---

:bow:

I didn't think I could love Jay Johnsan any more. Yet here we are.

quote:

---

So that's a realistic 8 more innings to score more runs.

---

Four more, assuming we were winning each game. 7 if we were tied or losing going into the 9th.

We were the home team in all but this last one. We would have batted 2 more times without the mercy rule against UCF (8th and 9th innings), 2 more times vs Milwaukee in the 3rd game (7th & 8th innings).

In the first game vs Milwaukee and the game vs Nicholls, we got to the 10-run lead in the bottom of the eighth inning, so we would not have batted in the bottom of the 9th unless we were tied or losing.

If we were tied or losing in all our home games, it would add another 3 inngs so that would be 7.

I prefer it this way. :lol:

quote:

---

Ummmm why again?

---

Here is what Google's AI tells me

quote:

---

Team Salary Requirements: Clubs must spend an average of 90% of the salary cap on player cash compensation over specified three-year tranches

---

All that dead money coming back to bite us :dunno:

Thanks JML and Cheer!

Awesome shutout game!

It worked! :lol:

quote:

---

Raise your hand if you remember these being called TRASH 80’s.

---