- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:46 pm to LSUSkip
If it requires a chip, no issue.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:47 pm to Scooba
quote:
The group recommends "driver monitoring systems, touch-based systems that can read your blood alcohol concentration through your fingertips and air-sampling systems that can test and isolate just the air exhaled by the driver."
What happens when it malfunctions and you're dead sober and your vehicle is turned into a giant paper weight?
Again, why are we punishing the law-abiding citizens over the decisions of a bunch of degens who can't seem to follow any rules? Just like the gun control argument.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:47 pm to Centinel
quote:True freedom is a complete lack of it.
Yup. It's rather apparent a large segment of this country wants every aspect of their life dictated by government.
Why be free when you can be safe?
Freedom from choice, consequences, fears, anxieties, etc.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:48 pm to bayoudude
quote:
Plus mouth was will set them off
cigarettes and food too.
the tech isnt good enough for this.
if its something that detects the air around you, well it better be damn accurate, which it wont.
the current breathalyzers need a strong steady blow into the device.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:48 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
walk around with a breathalyzer sticking out of your arse, baw?
yes
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:50 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Forcing every American to breath into a tube every time they get into their car is the appropriate way to do that?
What are the alternatives that have worked so far? It’s pretty simple to do.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:50 pm to Loup
quote:
yes
approved, carry on
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:50 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Again, why are we punishing the law-abiding citizens over the decisions of a bunch of degens who can't seem to follow any rules? Just like the gun control argument.
Because that's what we do in this country. Why tackle the actual issue that's hard when you can just make an easy mandate and say you "did something"?
It's our government at the federal, state, and local level.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:51 pm to Lou Pai
The funny part is that all the liberals who claim to hate authoritarianism will love this bullshite 
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:51 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Freedom from choice, consequences, fears, anxieties, etc.
The ultimate freedom is having every aspect of your live dictated by the government.
Just imagine how free the people were in the USSR. One day maybe we'll be that free.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:52 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
approved, carry on
I have a little pocket breathalyzer. I know it's not really accurate but it's probably close. I had a few beers and thought "damn I'd never drive like this" and hit the breathalyzer, .03. I'm a lightweight.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:53 pm to Loup
quote:
I have a little pocket breathalyzer. I know it's not really accurate but it's probably close. I had a few beers and thought "damn I'd never drive like this" and hit the breathalyzer, .03. I'm a lightweight.
smart
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:54 pm to Centinel
quote:
Yup. It's rather apparent a large segment of this country wants every aspect of their life dictated by government. Why be free when you can be safe?
The simple alternative
All for prohibition to end drunk driving say Aye
Posted on 8/5/21 at 1:01 pm to Lou Pai
Weed sales would explode.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 1:02 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
Again, why are we punishing the law-abiding citizens over the decisions of a bunch of degens who can't seem to follow any rules? Just like the gun control argument.
Is this a rhetorical question? Have you read 1984?
Posted on 8/5/21 at 1:05 pm to Lou Pai
Any drunk driving restrictive device will be figured out how to bypass it.
Thus rendering them useless and ineffective.
Further, it will be something that will unnecessarily prevent a vehicle from running properly
Thus rendering them useless and ineffective.
Further, it will be something that will unnecessarily prevent a vehicle from running properly
Posted on 8/5/21 at 1:05 pm to Lou Pai
I agree with this. Although no one wants to admit it, there is a large portion of the population who do not want to drive drunk, but also want to enjoy a nice evening with a drink before dinner and a glass or two of wine with dinner, and they do it. Go to a restaurant, a wedding, or an LSU tailgate. It happens everywhere. Not everyone wants to take a plain jane UBER as it may not be convenient for logistics or it has a bad image.
A guy who gets in a wreck just above the legal limit is thrown in the same cell as the guy 4X over the limit. Casual drinkers who flirt with the limit would want this option.
A guy who gets in a wreck just above the legal limit is thrown in the same cell as the guy 4X over the limit. Casual drinkers who flirt with the limit would want this option.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 1:07 pm to Centinel
quote:
Did she at least blow you while you were blowing her device?
nah, but I did she did flash me those perfect store bought boobs one time.....
quote:
They install the intoxalock, which does rolling tests. Meaning it could be in five minutes, or 50 minutes and you have to blow.
quote:
takes a picture of you while blowing.
This was in the late 90's. Intoxalock wasn't big back then. I don't think her machine had those features.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 1:08 pm to Shexter
Not anymore. They have cameras and are overly sensitive.
Page 6 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News