Started By
Message

re: 1 out of 10 people in the US have a 83 IQ or less

Posted on 11/28/18 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by Caplewood
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2010
39465 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 2:45 pm to
Says the literal retard
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19413 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 2:51 pm to
You can’t expect everyone to be on the right side of the bell curve
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
10057 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 2:55 pm to
Those people need to be spayed or neutered
Posted by TigerJeff
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
16356 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 2:57 pm to
MAGA! Duh, derrrrp...
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59214 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 2:57 pm to
Wow! 1/10 is nearly 13%!
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11689 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:00 pm to
10%. Actually, lower than I expected. I have a feeling most of these folks aren’t motivated enough to vote.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25427 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:03 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 9:14 pm
Posted by Trout Bandit
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2012
15053 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

And most of them are breeding like rabbits.


Fixed it for you.
Posted by cj35
Member since Jan 2014
6153 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:11 pm to
That number is extremely low. The number of Trumpkin supporters demonstrates that easily.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
20421 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:20 pm to
Dang, I just made the cut. Not summa cum laude, not magna cum laude, not laude, but a big oh thank you laude.
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9666 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:03 pm to
quote:


These people cannot be saved,



Are you suggesting that if the military deems an individual as not being mentally able to handle firearms and the other fundamentals of military life, that also precludes that individual from having a productive role in civilian society?

An IQ of 85 (or 115) is one standard deviation from the average IQ of 100. ~68% of the population falls into this segment, with IQs between 85 and 115. An IQ of 70 (or 130) is two standard deviations from average and ~95% of the population falls into the range between 70 and 130. Every OTer I’ve ever seen post his/her IQ has been above 130, giving them an IQ higher than 97.8% of the population. The guys and gals over 145 are three standard deviations from the norm and have higher scores than 99.9% of the population.

It really makes me wonder why I read so much stupid shite on here when everyone is, at a minimum, a near-genius. And 6’-5”, but that’s another discussion.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29831 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Every OTer I’ve ever seen post his/her IQ has been above 130, giving them an IQ higher than 97.8% of the population.


And only two of us have ever been willing to prove it.
Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
27776 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:09 pm to
What a IQ?
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9666 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:13 pm to
I have no doubt that the OT has posters with IQs over 130. However, I was just trying to illustrate the statistical improbability that the majority have IQs over 130.

Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29831 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:14 pm to
Which is why I was highlighting only a few out of a few thousand were willing to do it
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

The number of Trumpkin supporters demonstrates that easily.


These people seem to own you.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

thousands of years man advanced himself without bloated formal education. 



and to think, they did it without engineering texts.

I challenge your assertion that people "advanced themselves" thousands of years ago.

Bogus. Silly. Fatuous too.

Until the 1800s there was very little advancement. And even then it was mainly brits/Scots, Americans and Germans inventing and engineering.

Your test tube culture exists in Mindanao and borneo. No contributions to world society of any kind unless you count photography of their primitive garb. They have more Neanderthal DNA than you do and they have some Denasovan.
10% not homo sapiens dna.
And no patents. Zero.


This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 4:22 pm
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35539 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

that also precludes that individual from having a productive role in civilian society?


No. But what is that role? Perhaps in the greater discussion of minimum wage laws, etc., that there are people who are not worth even that low wage.

What's not getting it done is having these people on the government dole via welfare or disability. There needs to be a disincentive for unproductive and unintelligent people to breed.

I am 100 percent for paid sterilization. No one should ever be forced, but anyone of any race or economic situation should be able to cash in on a one-time fee for being sterilized. $10,000 sounds right. There are wealthy people who would do this, because they have no desire to have children.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

quote:

1 out of 10 people in the US have a 83 IQ or less

has*



Both can be considered correct


1 has, not 1 have.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

What would you do with this population?


Can we start with stopping subsidizing them having children
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram