- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Big 12 might boycott Texas Tech this year per Ross Dellenger
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:54 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:54 pm to RollTide1987
Delly sucks. Screw that liberal tard.
0
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:08 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
The Big 12 might boycott Texas Tech this year per Ross Dellenger
Fine with me.
TCU is at TT this year and it won't mess with my season tix.
Is there a financial penalty for the school that boycotts? Would have to think the revenue lost for a home game would be rough for TT to take.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:11 pm to RollTide1987
Would get sued for collusion.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:16 pm to gaetti15
If this judges ruling stands, and Sorsby plays 1 mfing down... then we all owe Pete a HUGE posthumous apology!
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:18 pm to RollTide1987
THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN. NO GOING BACK NOW!!!
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:23 pm to Underwood
quote:
what should we do about Cincinnati knowing he gambled and still playing him? death penalty I think.
I’m ok with this.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:24 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
Would get sued for collusion.
Is only agreeing to play by the rules all these schools, including TT, agreed to collusion?
TT is going to be playing a clearly ineligible player. Why would other league schools be forced into transparently illegitimate competition?
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:27 pm to lsupride87
quote:Not sure on the Oxford one, but this case in particular the Lubbock Judge recused himself and they brought on a retired Judge to make a ruling. The retired Judge served in Tarrant County, so good chance he is also Conservative, just interjecting that the Judge in Lubbock admitted he would have a conflict of interest.
Lubbock
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:40 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
You realize almost every judge and court that has made an anti NCAA ruling has been conservative right? Just making sure you understand the facts when throw around “activist judges.” If you intended to call conservative courts activist judges then I apologize and I agree with your label.
I don’t think anyone was suggesting there was an angle to it from an activist standpoint beyond judges who are reelected locally or open boosters for a school making biased rulings.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:06 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Texas Tech should have had some integrity themselves and told Sorsby to take a hike. THIS is the offense to do that on
I kind of wonder if TTU went along with letting Sorsby take his case to court, expecting that the judge would side with the NCAA and that Sorsby being ruled permanently ineligible would've given them grounds to void all of his NIL contracts and not have to pay him.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:22 pm to RollTide1987
Is there anything preventing a rival from getting a friendly judge to bar Sorsby from playing in his district?
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:25 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
I kind of wonder if TTU went along with letting Sorsby take his case to court, expecting that the judge would side with the NCAA and that Sorsby being ruled permanently ineligible would've given them grounds to void all of his NIL contracts and not have to pay him.
Tech had no choice to go along with this. They have one of the most expensive rosters in cfb even without Sorsby. Without a QB this year’s team would just be a repeat of 2025. Destroy overmatched conference opponents then get boat raced in the playoffs.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:26 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You think those are elected liberal judges?
He isn't an elected judge, he isn't even an active judge.
He's a retired judge, graduated law school 50 years ago, they pulled out of retirement to hear this case.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:27 pm to longhorn22
quote:
Him gambling has nothing to do with his abilities on the football field. Let him play.
Apparently the courts may decide that, but the other schools can do whatever they choose just like Texas Tech. They can refuse to play them.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:31 pm to Underwood
quote:
what should we do about Cincinnati knowing he gambled and still playing him? death penalty I think.
NCAA should drop the hammer on them and make them re-hire Brian Kelly
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:34 pm to RollTide1987
That isn't gonna happen. Nothing to gain by boycotting games for anyone. There are no rules anymore so it would be better if people planned accordingly.
If the tv contract is structured in such a way that the conference has to refund money for boycotted games....no one will boycott.
If the tv contract is structured in such a way that the conference has to refund money for boycotted games....no one will boycott.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:35 pm to RollTide1987
Good, let them
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:38 pm to Tiger Prawn
Cinn. has sued him for the NIL money he got from them. As for the judge, Thamel said that he has a history of.......successfully...suing the NCAA.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:40 pm to longhorn22
quote:
Him gambling has nothing to do with his abilities on the football field. Let him play.
What? There’s literally been people arrested and served jail time for similar occurrences.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News