Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1159
Registered on:12/22/2008
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
It doesn’t matter. Both teams will make the playoffs as the SEC will get 3 teams in the playoffs. I expect Bama to win Saturday but I expect UGA to advance much further than Bama in the playoffs. This will be a fun game but like Texas-Ohio St it is just an appetizer for the playoffs.
Yeah, I’m a GT alum and fan. Our defense is horrible. What does that have to do with anything. I predict the Natty winner will be one of three teams - UGA, Indiana, or Miami and I don’t think anyone else has a chance. Bama would be my 4th right now, but I can see their QB going down the way he runs. I think Bama rolls UGA next week, but I also see UGA as getting better and not distracted by a loss. Kirby will have them ready for the playoffs.
The SEC no longer plays defense. That’s the difference. Look at the other thread about defensive rankings. Defense was always the calling card of the SEC. Teams could barely get in the red zone against Bama and UGA in the past. Now, it’s whoever scores 35 first wins.

When the weather turns cold and games get magnified in the playoffs defense always shows up and a lot of times we’ve seen the high flying offenses fizzle. I still believe UGA is the SEC’s best chance in the playoffs even though I think Bama beats them next weekend. Kirby will take a loss and get better throughout the season.
And this is why the SEC may be watching someone else hoist the trophy. The SEC doesn’t have a team in the top 10 for defense. For some reason they went BIG 12 style of football and can’t stop anyone.
Michigan had become soft so it’s gonna take him a year to turn the roster.
It’s being glazed because it’s Northwestern. A mid level football program, first rate educational institution, being very smart with their program. I have no connection to Northwestern but if the opportunity presented itself I’d buy a ticket if in the area just like I would at Tennessee or a big SEC stadium. It’s the experience of it.
I’m sure Northwestern doesn’t mind if other teams want to “take over” their stadium. More money for them. And if they get consistently good they’ll have more than half the stadium being season ticket holders which is also smart. My team sucks this year and the student section never sits, It’s one big party regardless of score. Our students wish they would take out the bleacher seats and just have standing room as it would make it easier for more people to be in that area and move around.

More mid level teams will start going to this model. My team absolutely should and then play the big games in MBS but our above 80 years old fanbase won’t let it happen due to nostalgia. Eventually it will happen though as our stadium is the oldest in D1 with zero amenities.
You say so far UGA has played a tougher schedule? Please tell me you are joking? I believe UGA is the best team in the country and will win the tournament but as of week 4 they have done nothing except beat a bunch of nobodies. All I want is you guys be consistent. Heck, I have a lot of UGA friends and even they laugh at the polls. At least UGA fans finally get a real game tomorrow they can enjoy.
It seats 35K. Student section has no seats and is standing only. Every seat is close to the field. It’s built for intimacy and noise. Very smart by a mid level program with a small fanbase. And if they get really good like Indiana they can easily move the big games to Soldier Field.
I think the ref standing underneath the post had the best view.
Saying strength of schedule always mattered is rewriting history. For decades all that mattered was twisting arms of sports editors to vote for your team. The strength of schedule argument is a just a joke because it’s a manipulated stat.

Right now, Pitt and VT are playing a game where both are undefeated. This could be a 1 vs 2 game yet it’s not because of manipulation. What has UGA done more than VT or Pitt to be ranked #2 and not Pitt or VT? Are you going to tell me that Oklahoma is a legit team with that QB play?

The playoffs have shown that the strength of schedule controlled by ESPN is a joke. Otherwise, how do you explain a team that didn’t even make the weak ACC conference championship game and was a low seed ran roughshod over the SEC against teams all with “higher’ strength of schedule ratings and higher playoff seeds? It’s because it’s not real. It’s just so ESPN can pump up ranked matchups so you guys eat it up and spend money. Meanwhile, Louisville and SMU did something no one in the SEC could do and that was beat Miami.
All I want is a true champion we can all accept without argument. And the playoffs are giving that to us. We haven’t had a real debate about who the champ is in a long time. Instead we argue about who should be 10, 11, and 12.

The old days of old school coaches getting Natties by threatening media outlets did not give us a true champion. It gave us a crap show. My team did it back in the 40’s and 50’s because Bobby Dodd had a lot of power and twisted the media arms no different than ND and the Bear did. Can you imagine being a newspaper editor in the south and voting for Michigan over the Bear. You’d never get access to a southern stadium again.

It was a joke and you guys worship this corruption.

An expanded playoff is played in front of us so can’t be cheated, we all watched Ole Miss beat UGA and Indiana beat Miami. I enjoy the conclusion of the season not being surrounded by argument of who is the Natty. The playoffs solved that.

And I’ve always said the regular season is nothing more than making money and getting better for the playoffs - just like every other sport. I have never been a “regular season is sacrosanct” guy like many if you. When teams like BYU and UCF went undefeated you guys gave them no credit which made your argument about the regular season hilarious. If you really believed the regular season should matter then UCF should have been given the Natty but then you want to bring in other criteria outside of wins which is comical.
Have you guys not figured out that ESPN manipulates the polls for ratings? They want that Florida-Texas and Florida-UGA to bring huge ratings so get them both in the top 8 or even top 5 and the lemmings will run for the ratings. It’s all a ruse to get you to watch. Florida may be for real and if they are then we’ll see these games in December and January when they really matter.
Miami lost 2 ACC games and ran thru the playoffs to the Natty game. You guys have some serious bias because Bama and UGA have been dominant. How many SEC playoff losses will it take for some of you to realize that maybe you are being fed a line of crap from ESPN so they can continue to get big ratings from southern fans who buy the rankings BS so they can hype their games.
I never said the regular season really mattered. Like in all sports the regular season is to make money from dumb fans while teams figure out their team and get better. A few losses is no big deal. And the vast majority of fans absolutely want an expanded playoff. I understand this particular board or conference may not, but the vast majority of fanbases want a shot which 24 then 32 will give them.

You guys can whine all you want about the old days and be upset that Bama can’t be given another title by the Oklahoma City Gazette, but them are the breaks. The future is an expanded playoff. And if you don’t like it then stop watching, but since you are here posting you obviously will watch just like you’ll watch Ohio St play Texas again and you may see UGA playing Bama twice or even 3 times over the next 3 months.
College football was not unique in anyway because a loss on September 4 ended your season. College football was stupid. They are finally making it a legitimate sport by having a real playoff/. You guys who believe the sport was better when 80% of teams were eliminated by September 20 can just spend your old age whining then. The rest of us are going to love watching December and January football. That a team is 9-3 instead of 11-1 or 12-0 means nothing. And this talk of lower seeded teams having no chance is just dumb. Miami was just the 11 seed and made the Natty over your juggernaut teams. So just stop. No one is buying it. The fans want playoff football when it matters. September games are fun but they are just scrimmages.
Why are you guys bragging about games that are watered down and don’t mean anything since many will make the playoffs by your own logic?

UGA-Bama next week is an irrelevant game yet people will spend thousands to attend.
You guys who scream the regular season will be devalued are morons. If it was so devalued why did 70,000 plus spend thousands to watch LSU-Ole Miss or Texas-Tenn. You guys say they are devalued yet the customer is telling you differently with their wallet. You say Aubun-Bama won’t mean anything yet the stadium will be packed. Next week UGA plays Bama and that guy will be SOLD OUT yet every person attending knows they will both make the playoffs.

All an expanded playoff does is create more entertainment and better football as UGA-Bama part II in January will be freaking awesome. Just like Ohio State-Texas will be freaking awesome because both teams will be bettter in December than they were in early September.
Dude, it’s not just me flag waving. Did you not watch the playoff games? They were SOLD OUT and the ratings were high. So, I guess a lot of fans are flag waving. I just watched Texas-Tennessee and those were a lot of flag wavers in that stadium. And in a week when UGA plays Bama I expect a lot of flag wavers. And when both of those teams make the playoffs I suspect those games will be sold out too.

This idea that the sport is dying because it’s not the past is exactly what fans always say. I remember my grandfather whining about the NFL-AFL merger and how those teams couldn’t stand a chance and were inferior. By Super Bowl 3 that was exposed as a lie. Heck, the old guard stood in the way of #1 vs. #2 for 70 years. Then when we go the BCS everyone loved it.

The only real question is how long until the next generation puts asterisks on every non-playoff Natty. The sooner the better.
Of course it’s going to 24. This was a foregone conclusion when the BCS finally ripped the bowl system death grip from the sport.

And everyone loves it and will love it. If some of you don’t for whatever nostalgic reason you have then enjoy hating the sport. But it’s all been exposed as a joke. You guys talked about the rabid SEC fanbases and being over to take over stadiums, etc, etc, and yet within 2 years of being good, the freaking Indiana fanbase took over Mercedes Benz as if they were UGA or Tennessee fans. That proves that it’s all about having good players rather than location or culture. You guys have been smelling your own farts for so long that you don’t realize that everyone farts.
YStar,
That is a classic SEC whinefest. You hit all the talking points so I give you credit. But no one cares because when the SEC had the power they ran roughshod over the sport like you believe the BIG is doing now. You guys sure didn’t listen to anyone when you and ESPN manipulated the BCS era.

It’s the story of mankind - whoever has the power decides the game and the BIG has the power. And because of the way the SEC ran the sport is why a lot of southern fans, like me, are quite happy seeing the BIG throw their weight around while you guys play second fiddle.