by
63 Comments
Minor Leaguer Breaks Up No-Hitter In Ninth Inning With A Bunt, Then Benches Clear
© Tim Heitman-USA TODAY Sports

This Double -A minor leaguer pulled a pretty jerk move when he laid done a bunt during the opposing team's no-hitter. Per The Spun...
quote:

Tuesday night, a game at the Double-A level reignited the debate again. The Hartford Yard Goats, leading 3-0 against the Trenton Thunder, had a no-hitter going between three pitchers and one out in the ninth inning.

Thunder batter Matt Lipka decided to try a bunt and laid it down perfectly. He posted the first hit of the game for his team.

Predictably, the Yard Goats were not thrilled with his decision. The benches cleared, but it doesn’t look like anyone threw any haymakers.

Filed Under: MLB
63 Comments
user avatar
user avatar
UGATiger2672 months
WTF...I mean, it was 3-0 with 1 out. Get a man on base, and who knows what can happen from there. So teams are supposed to stop trying to win if the opposing pitcher has a no-hitter going? There's a reason no-hitters are special, and it kind of diminishes the accomplishment if the other team is just expected to roll over in the 9th inning.
user avatar
TampaTiger2272 months
Spoken like someone who doesn't know shite about baseball.
user avatar
pellietigersaint72 months
@tampatiger22 frick that man. we know baseball but competition superseeds unwritten rules. If I was at bat, I'd try to spoil the no hitter. frick the other team. you cant convince any real competitor otherwise
user avatar
FredBear72 months
It's not the batters job to put himself out, that's on the pitcher and the defense. That's true regardless of the situation.
user avatar
BCLA72 months
"a no-hitter going between three pitchers" Stopped reading here. It's a non issue if there's more than one pitcher.
user avatar
TigerFanatic9972 months
This.
user avatar
Hester Carries72 months
Its also minor league baseball where records are bull shite anyway.
user avatar
jpainter617472 months
It was a multi-pitcher no hitter... not the same as if it was one pitcher, who cares
user avatar
SomeLSUguy72 months
That doesn't really change anything, but it changes everything!
user avatar
CAD703X72 months
I mean they're only down by 3 was he not supposed to try to get on base?
user avatar
UAinSOUTHAL72 months
frick that. The opposing team is paid to win, not lay down because you have a no hitter with 1 out in the 9th. You have to earn it. This is exactly what is wrong with the SJW everyone needs a trophy mentality in this country.
user avatar
Peepdip72 months
You were doing so good until the last sentence.
user avatar
Zzyzx72 months
Baseball is so dumb. Stop him from reaching 1st if you want the no hitter. Cry babies
user avatar
Sid in Lakeshore72 months
Score was 3-0..... They needed base runners. Play better defense.
user avatar
theOG72 months
The worst part about these titty babies crying is that the no hitter was between three pitchers! It's not like one guy had been out there grinding the whole game and the bunt happened.
user avatar
ChineseBandit5872 months
Which makes it all the more silly that this pitcher was the one so mad about it. Bunt to get on - steal 2nd - hope the walk the next batter to set up dp - hope for a HR to tie the game - go on to win. THAT would have been my mental process up to bat in that situation.
user avatar
SUB72 months
Damn, if this article title doesn't describe "participation trophy" generation best, I don't know what does. Should the batter just have let him strike him out? Jeez. What a bunch of losers.
user avatar
Hester Carries72 months
What are you talking about? This is a remnant of "old baseball". But yeah blame a hundred years of dumb baseball tradition on the younger generation that inherited it.
user avatar
SUB72 months
A remnant of old baseball is folding over and giving a no-hitter (even though this wasn't a true one) to a pitcher? Sounds like a pussy sport to begin with then.
user avatar
kywildcatfanone72 months
No issue with the bunt. It was a single just like any other single
user avatar
CarRamrod72 months
how is that a jerk move? His goal stepping up to the plate was to get a hit.
user avatar
msudawg120072 months
I don’t understand this “unwritten rule” not to bunt to break up a no-hitter. You do what you have to do to get baserunners on and win the game.
user avatar
AtlantaLSUfan72 months
Its the only “unwritten rule” that I disagree with.
user avatar
udtiger72 months
You play to win the game.
user avatar
crewdepoo72 months
“What a dick” For getting a hit?
user avatar
tadelatt72 months
I am sorry but if you cannot hit this guy, what is wrong with bunting? He has to earn the No-Hitter, not just hope the other teams gives it to him once he reaches the 9th inning.
user avatar
imjustafatkid72 months
Huh? A bunt is a hit. Why wouldn't he take what the defense was giving him?
user avatar
PoBoy172 months
It was a 3-0 game. No one is entitled to a no-hitter. Don't allow a bunt hit, pitcher.
user avatar
CAD703X72 months
"No one is entitled to a no-hitter." on top of that it was 3 different pitchers EL OH EL
user avatar
BayouBlue72 months
I have no issue with this play
user avatar
ConwayGamecock72 months
A bunt is an official hit in baseball. If you cannot get a hit against a pitcher the conventional way, then do what you have to do. If you can't even get a bunt for a hit, then get walked or get hit with the pitch. You don't play for the team no-hitting you, you play for your team....
user avatar
Xcalibur201772 months
Be a man and have some respect for the game JA
Popular Stories
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram