ChineseBandit58

quote:

---

They have nothing to offer

---

I've never seen anything like it - ALL they got is "HATE TRUM" - whatever Trump is FOR we OPPOSE and vice versa - DEMOCRATs have ZERO independent thought.

No wonder the Communists are pulling the rug from under their feet - and all they can say is "me too" to THAT abortion.

quote:

---

He did do what Gingrich told him to do though.

---

yep - and promised to undo it as soon as elected

But when he saw how effective and popular it was, he adopted it as his own = and the media assisted greatly

quote:

---

GOAT president, after only Lincoln of course.

---

:lol: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
you got to be kidding - ---- :rolleyes:

:spank: :spank:

need MOAR!!! of this

Shoot 'em all - burn the ground the bodies lie on - create a cess pool in which to dump future refuse. .

quote:

---

Immigrants like her

---

are who built the America we love.

quote:

---

You finally put a few concrete questions on the table

---

Your incapacity to approach this simple situation is now beyond repair - Stay with "no evidence" = that will damage your remaining brain power less than trying to make a cogent argument of the Democrats positions - positions that declare is a loud voice " WE CHEAT - ALWAYS HAVE - ALWAYS WILL - and don't your DARE think we are going to agree to prevent ILLEGAL ALIENs vote in our national elections then you better think again.

new motto:
WE WILL TURN OURSELVES INTO DEVOTED COMMUNISTS before we will turn loose our ace in the hole for close elections.

quote:

---

ou wrote there was “never a scintilla of actual evidence” against Trump. You called the charges “absolutely fake” and chalked the whole thing up to Democrats simply hating him. That’s exactly what I meant. You didn’t examine a particular allegation and explain why the evidence failed. You waved off the entire body of adverse evidence before weighing any of it.

---

OK - democrats have had 2 impeachments, dozens of lawsuits, 10 years, and billions of dollars spent by thousands of fellow travelers with the full fledged support of 3/4 the national media.

What have they produced? please name a result from all that investigation.

And what - in your opinion was this "evidence" thing you say WE lack in our questions about the 2020 election. Was THEIR 'evidence' OK with you??

All WE are doing is asking for law enforcement people to do their jobs - but notice WE are not out rioting in the streets and burning down buildings and assassinating people. WE are merely asking pertinent QUEStiONs that you nor anyone else can dare to try answering - you learned this little phrase "not enough evidence to get a reversal" as though it were handed down from God himself.

OF COURSE there is no 'evidence' by YOUR definition (whatever that is). YOU and your cohorts demand that WE - ordinary citizens with a brain - can look at a scenairo and think 'something wrong here' - same as if the same guy kept winning the lottery every time, and happened to be related to the sponsor = WE would suspect that someone should INVESTIGATE that - but YOU would demand WE find the EVIDENCE That it really happened.

YOU are the one just hiding behind what you think is a clever 'get out of jail free card'

SO - describe the 'evidence' they had again Trump in ANY of his 'criminal trials' - and where did that 'evidence' originate?'

WE are using the suspicious FACTs about a national election - completely divorced from reality in EVERY WAY - and asking - what went on behind those closed doors = doors they would not allow the usual 'observers' to 'observe close enough to see anything. (that darned COVID thing that just "happened' do occur from the Democrats best friendly nation = CHINA = that ALSO gave democrats carte blanche to change ANY and ALL election standards that they wanted - WITHOUT proper observation.

You bring up our 'dedication' to 'Donald Trump' while WE are merely trying to bring facts and rational observations to an election scenario that causes any democrat to falll into a fit === while YOU followed every piece of shite allegation against trump with your mouth drooling just hoping = WE GOT HIM ThIS TIME!!!! a dozen times or more. And alll the 'evidence' that must have passed muster with you then has ALL been found to be nothing but made up out of whole cloth from the Clinton campaign, illegally pushed thru by Obama on his way out of office to try any find SOMETHING - ANYTHING to stop the big bad orange man.

You have NOTHING - yet demand that WE single-handedly solve a problem that requires ALLOWING us to examine the actual EVIDENCE.

You say we got no evidence - that is because YOUR side has it all as refused to allow anyone to see it.

I'm done with you - unless you make at least one salient point in defense of the democrat action over the past decade.

quote:

---

Bubba, you’ve mistaken consistency for partisanship. My principle does not change with the defendant’s name. Yours does.

---

example please

quote:

---

You reject election allegations for want of proof, yet dismiss every adverse finding against Trump as fraudulent by definition.

---

name one

quote:

---

Let’s get real.

---

game on !!

I have not heard you (don't follow you - just going by what I happen to see once in a while) criticize ONE instance of the now-proven (to any logical mind) the wholesale attack by the Federal Government, led by democrats and RINO, against Trump during his first term - practically 'imprisoning him in various courts and media traps. And that all intensified with even more vigor during the "biden admin" (or whomever was calling the shots)

And not one kickback by any of the legacy media on the UNFAIRNESS, if not completely illegality, of any of the crap.

What IS the most egregious act initiated by Democrats agains POTUS Trump during his first term? -- OR - do you see complete logic and fact of suspicion in ALL of the attacks.

Point me to a criticism you lodged THEN, and I will retract every comment I've made against you.

But as I sit here and read your inputs, I have you pegged as being totally devoted to whatever the DNC or legacy media tell you.

quote:

---

so who was running the country

---

same people who ran the Obama presidency - only difference is that Obama was fully awake and agreed with the process.