re: Why have Trump, Rudy, et al waited so long to publicly release their evidence?

quote:

---

And yes, the election was probably stolen. But when we foolishly include bullshite in our charges - which Trump and his idiot minions certainly did

---

What? The OP is claiming no evidence.

quote:

---

Didn't Dinesh D'Souza produce a movie 2000 mules with video tape of ballot harvesting? Is that not evidence?

---

Ballot harvesting is legal in 24 states and DC. Also, D’Souza is being sued by several of the people he claimed were stuffing ballots. 2000 Mules was a movie with an agenda no different than the Making A Murderer series was.

quote:

---

the news sources you heavily rely upon simply have not reported any of it.

---

Ask him to name HIS go-to sources for News.

He's quick to dismiss anything from sources he sees as Right-leaning, but so far hasn't had the guts to go on record with HIS favorite sources.

Usually when someone refuses to name those they consider legit sources, it's a sign of cowardice because they know THEIR sources won't stand up to the scrutiny they project on others.

quote:

---

Perhaps the answer is, the news sources you heavily rely upon simply have not reported any of it.

---

No this site keeps posting about the, but rarely in a setting to withstand scrutiny.

Like these 2 examples you posted earlier:

quote:

---

Do you believe unspoiled test ballots generated at the DVS Fulton Machine Test Center, which were never audited, could have been fraudulently inserted into the system?

Do you believe Ruby Freeman when she says, after the observers left, they were told "the count was short," so her supervisor pulled out a box of votes from under the table, and they started processing them?

---

Rudy admitted he lied instead of producing any evidence to support either of these claims. Why? Even if the damages weren't crazy, he'd still have had to pay into 6-figures for this admission. Why not just, you know, produce his evidence?

quote:

---

The OP is claiming no evidence.

---

I'm not claiming "no evidence".

I'm asking why people being prosecuted and sued refuse to show this evidence to defend themselves, and why they even waited until trial to unleash the kraken, so to speak.

quote:

---

Ask him to name HIS go-to sources for News.

---

I don't have a single "go to" source for news.

quote:

---

He's quick to dismiss anything from sources he sees as Right-leaning

---

This is a lie.

I'm quick to dismiss anything from shitty outlets that deceive, like the Gateway Pundit, who I routinely own on here with minimal research. The Jacobin has more intellectual merit and integrity. The Jacobin!.

quote:

---

OP voted for Biden

---

quote:

---

and 100% supports leftist causes,

---

LINK?

quote:

---

including lawfare against political opponents

---

You can't even adequately define "lawfare" for any sort of discussion.

Without transparency, government is guilty until proven innocent.

The burden of proof is not on the people to show we had an honest election.

quote:

---

Without transparency, government is guilty until proven innocent.

---

You just made that up

quote:

---

The burden of proof is not on the people to show we had an honest election.

---

That has nothing to do with Rudy making statements and then swearing and confirming these statements were a lie, instead of producing evidence.

Or the Pillow Guy losing a $5M bet about his purported evidence he released to the public.

quote:

---

Because they don’t have evidence. Mostly because they’re lazy and incompetent.

---

I think most are very aware of this now. They were counting on people using their common sense, video evidence, obvious discrepancies and abnormalities and for there to be a massive public outcry. They didnt expect that the steal was reasonably well pulled off in a way thats hard to legally prove. They also didnt expect the US government to go full Soviet on dissenters to hunt them down, throw them in prison, or try to bankrupt them with endless lawfare.