- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why have Trump, Rudy, et al waited so long to publicly release their evidence?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:26 am to KiwiHead
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:26 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Please, the government is not going after dissenters. They went after assholes who got carried away in a riot at the Capitol and assaulted cops, trespassed and did cause some property damage. Dissenters who went to the rally and then went on their way are not facing any harassment or prosecution. Trumpists want to act irresponsibly and then play the victim when they get called out. Rudy acted recklessly, his mouth was writing checks his arse could not cash.....and he knew it.
What about the Infowars reporter who was jailed but never entered the Capitol or committed any violence? What about the guy in prison for sharing memes on twitter?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:29 am to NC_Tigah
Sidney Powell is a lawyer. She could have represented herself. If she wasn't guilty.
Instead she plead guilty rather than simply presenting the evidence of voter fraud. Because there wasn't any. Which she admitted under oath at a deposition.
All these people are being accused of crimes. And being sued for billions. If the evidence was there, they would have long since brought it out.
Instead they take loss after loss. Because the don't have a defense.
Instead she plead guilty rather than simply presenting the evidence of voter fraud. Because there wasn't any. Which she admitted under oath at a deposition.
All these people are being accused of crimes. And being sued for billions. If the evidence was there, they would have long since brought it out.
Instead they take loss after loss. Because the don't have a defense.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
and apolitical)
Just clownshow.
This post was edited on 12/18/23 at 8:31 am
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:31 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
What about the Infowars reporter who was jailed but never entered the Capitol or committed any violence?
He violated an order in a previous case from an old prosecution. He agreed not to go back to the capitol and he clearly did.
quote:
What about the guy in prison for sharing memes on twitter?
What does this have to do with Jan6?
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:32 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Just clownshow.
Trump fricked up, bigly, on the obstruction stuff. I don't know what else to tell you. He knew they were watching him and he acted like a buffoon.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:32 am to No Colors
quote:
Instead they take loss after loss. Because the don't have a defense.
If they had evidence, they would lay it out.
I'm sick of "clues" and that kind of shite. If they have it, produce it.
If not, shut the frick up and focus on 2024.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No it's a legitimate question.
No it isn't. You've been here the last 3 years.
This question either categorizes you as a troll, a liar, or a moron. I have to interest in guiding you on this self exploration. Figure it out for yourself.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:33 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If they had evidence, they would lay it out.
Derp.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:33 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
What about the Infowars reporter who was jailed but never entered the Capitol or committed any violence? What about the guy in prison for sharing memes on twitter?
You have a bunch of suburbanite and urbanites who would rather be cool and part of the system than admit the government is well on its way to becoming an authoritarian monster.
Unless you’re talking about real criminals, then they will prattle on like the useless hens that they are about social justice reform and the need for examination of our incarceration rates.
They have no ability to think past what they’re told to think.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:34 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You've been here the last 3 years.
And I'm still waiting.
quote:
I have to interest in guiding you on this self exploration.
Neither do the people claiming to have evidence, apparently.
quote:
Figure it out for yourself.
Well I guess I'll have to keep trying, since the people who claim to have evidence refuse to show us this evidence.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not really. I'm not a Boomer who flips through his one newspaper every day for all of his news.
Again, you're a pussy who won't answer for fear of having your sources scrutinized.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If they had evidence, they would lay it out.
Have you ignored the mountains of evidence that have been produced? Good lord, man. I know you hate Trump, but to legitimize the 2020 election and say there isn’t any evidence just makes you look like you’re in bad faith.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:37 am to the808bass
quote:
You have a bunch of suburbanite and urbanites who would rather be cool and part of the system than admit the government is well on its way to becoming an authoritarian monster.
I've just been through this before, from GWB, to Obama, To Trump, and now Biden. It's always the same "they're bringing authoritarianism!" stuff by whichever side feels they're not in power.
Remember when GWB was going to declare martial law to stay in power? Remember when Obama was going to do the same? Then Trump?
quote:
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me—you can't get fooled again
quote:
Unless you’re talking about real criminals
"real"
quote:
They have no ability to think past what they’re told to think.
I'm legit curious who is telling me what to think
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does this have to do with Jan6?
I didnt say Jan6 I said dissenters.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:40 am to oogabooga68
quote:
you're a pussy who won't answer for fear of having your sources scrutinized
Dude when I read the news, it depends on what subject is being covered and how I'm reading it. I also understand the typical bias of the outlet (and sometimes the specific writer/speaker).
Yes, this includes reading jokes like TGP to see what lies they're promoting, to figure out why they're having to lie (and what the intended impact is). I usually start with bad outlets like this, actually, because of the framing they rely upon so much.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm legit curious who is telling me what to think
We've asked you to name the sources where you get your daily talking points at least twice in this very thread.
The fact you won't commit is telling.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:43 am to ronricks
quote:I don't give a rat's arse about a "defamation" suit against D’Souza.
Defamation lawsuit against D’Souza
You brought up vote harvesting. You intimated in raising the issue that vote harvesting is perfectly fine because it is legal. Gay/Trans grooming-type behavior is legal in many states and DC. Child grooming sets the table for abhorrent criminal activity. So does vote harvesting.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:43 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Without transparency, government is guilty until proven innocent.
The burden of proof is not on the people to show we had an honest election.
And that proof is that every local election official from sea to shining sea certified the election under their supervision. That's the Secretaries of State for each and every state and thousands of local Clerks of Court, etc. They all certified that in their little part of the system, the election was fairly run and properly counted.
You simply won't accept it no matter what, because you have been told that you shouldn't.
Posted on 12/18/23 at 8:43 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
I didnt say Jan6 I said dissenters.
Meme guy wasn't a dissenter. I hope you realize that categorizing him as a "dissenter" makes the criminal charge more valid.
I doubt that is your intention.
Mackey was charged 19 days after J6, after the Trump DOJ/FBI investigated him for months.
Popular
Back to top


2





