Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:15535
Registered on:8/29/2017
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

I've never seen someone suck so much liberal cock and pretend to be a conservative than SFP. He really is a piece of shite.


At some point SFP decided he would copy Hank’s shtick of pretending to be “conservative”.
quote:

I’m taking my kids to see a show they’re obsessed with.


Drag queen story time?

Bama fans

Posted by thebigmuffaletta on 1/1/26 at 6:16 pm
Hoosier Daddy?
quote:

Read the indictment. I linked it above.


That indictment reads like it was written by CNN. Smith is still claiming that Trump incited violence on J6 and still claimed that during his testimony.
quote:

If you call your Congressman and say "People are dying on the streets, so you need to vote for this legislation." When you know that people are not dying on the streets, is a criminal offense according to Jack Smith. You made a knowingly false statement with an intent to interfere with a government function. I am not sure what statute he is relying on, but as applied it sure seems unconstitutional.


Likewise, democrats who lie about illegal immigration and incite the disruption of removals and deportations are committing fraud according to Jack Smith.
quote:

He was explicit that he was discussing false statements that interfere with a lawful governmental function.


Claim that publicly making false statements is protected by the 1st amendment but then claim that publicly making “false statements” is in fact fraud. Might as well just say that he doesn’t believe in free speech because that’s what he’s saying.
quote:

But it does seem rather pointless. As many have already indicated, that photo has been "public" for many years.


That should be your clue right there that democrats had ulterior motives for releasing the photo redacted.
quote:

My position has not changed one iota, not once.


Sure you have. Earlier you said that there’s some superduper credentialed journalist that are doing investigations for like 20 hours and that’s what a “real journalist” is. Now your argument is the media. Shouldn’t have to investigate whether or not the redacted photo of Trump is with Epstein victims or actual adults.
quote:

My use of "Dem stupidity" was a description of the assertion that some "Dem representatives were actually calling them Epstein victims," NOT to any assertion that Dems released the photo.


The entire point of them inserting the redacted photo into the release was to give the impression that Trump was with Epstein victims You know this you were just being a dishonest, leftist hack as usual
quote:

I give up.


You should. You’ve changed your argument like 4 or 5 times
quote:

I will guarantee you the test will take into account some form of quality of output as a factor. Part of what training does it teach you how to produce better outpu


Dan Rather had all of the credentials you believe make someone a “real professional journalist”.
quote:

For the 400th time, the redacted photo was released by the GOP-controlled House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ... not by Democrats.


I’m replying to the post where YOU said it was Dem stupidity
quote:

Are you suggesting that "the media" should have rhetorically "sat on" that redacted photo ... until what? They were able to identify every redacted face?


How long would it have taken them to discover it’s a very publicly available image of Trump with adults?
quote:

She is speculating as to the motives of the COMMITTEE in redacting those faces.


With the full intent to give her audience the impression that Trump is in a photo with Epstein victims.

quote:

I don't recall that. But I don't spend as much time as you, obsessing over Dem stupidity.


They didn’t release it because they are stupid. They release it because they wanted to give the impression that Trump was in a photo with Epstein victims.

It’s the same reason democrats and your beloved “journalists” lie about Trump 24/7. They know it will eventually be exposed as a lie, but the damage has already been done.
quote:

MANY outlets quickly published the unredacted photo specifically to counter the incorrect inference that the six ladies were Epstein Minors.


No, they were forced to do after the NY Post published the unredacted and very publicly available photo.

BTW, that’s the same NY Post that broke the Hunter Biden laptop story that your beloved “credentialed journalists” claimed was fake and Russian propaganda.
quote:

Usually something that one acquires through years of careful work, supervised by competent editors.


Like Dan Rather?
She’s clearly telling her audience she believes the photo shows Trump with Epstein victims. It doesn’t get anymore affirmative than that.
quote:

They did it for effect.


They also ran with, for the better part of a day, that Trump’s DOJ was involved in a coverup and deleting pictures of Trump from the Epstein files release when in fact they were removed because a court asked that they be reviewed.
quote:

Ostensibly to protect their identities.


Their identities were already known. That photo has been public for decades.