- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What are the Pros and Cons of a Palestinian Two-State Solution?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:09 pm
We should really examine this topic here on Political Talk.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:11 pm to Champagne
Pros: It solves the entire problem
Cons: It's a ridiculous fantasy that only dullards believe is possible.
Cons: It's a ridiculous fantasy that only dullards believe is possible.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:15 pm to Champagne
I don't care. Not my problem. I believe Israel has the right to defend itself in whatever way it deems necessary.
If the Mooslums dont like it, let em try and do something about it.
That hasn't worked out very well for them in the past. Just sayin
If the Mooslums dont like it, let em try and do something about it.
That hasn't worked out very well for them in the past. Just sayin
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:16 pm to Champagne
Pro: It seems reasonable, on the surface.
Con: The Palestinians will never stop plotting to destroy their neighbor.
Con: The Palestinians will never stop plotting to destroy their neighbor.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:19 pm to Champagne
Pros: you have two ethno states living next door to each other
Cons: First, we already tried it once. Those two states were Israel and Jordan. The result was Jordan immediately invaded Israel, but lost so badly, that they permanently lost control of what is now known as The West Bank.
Second, no one involved actually wants this, not the Palestinians, not the Gazans, not the Israelis. The 2 state solution is a scam on the West. The only reason any Palestinians advocate for an independent Palestinian state is to use it as a base from which to launch greater attacks on Israel to drive the Jews into the Sea.
The Israelis know this, and thus publicly endorse a 2 state solution to look like they care about peace while they undermine it via illegal settlements designed to further fragment the West Bank.
Cons: First, we already tried it once. Those two states were Israel and Jordan. The result was Jordan immediately invaded Israel, but lost so badly, that they permanently lost control of what is now known as The West Bank.
Second, no one involved actually wants this, not the Palestinians, not the Gazans, not the Israelis. The 2 state solution is a scam on the West. The only reason any Palestinians advocate for an independent Palestinian state is to use it as a base from which to launch greater attacks on Israel to drive the Jews into the Sea.
The Israelis know this, and thus publicly endorse a 2 state solution to look like they care about peace while they undermine it via illegal settlements designed to further fragment the West Bank.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:19 pm to Champagne
CON: they're inbred sheep frickers.
That's really all you need to know about them.
That's really all you need to know about them.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:19 pm to Champagne
Just an FYI the current position of the U.S. State Department is a two-state solution.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:19 pm to Champagne
Pro: 2 states
Con: 2 states
Con: 2 states
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:23 pm to Champagne
One side could probably live with a 2 state arrangement. The other might say they can, but we all know they will not.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:27 pm to Vacherie Saint
How about a Zero State Solution. Wipe out both sides and make it a vacation destination for the rest of the world.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:28 pm to Champagne
Who would pay to prop up the Palestinian state in perpetuity? It's not like they will suddenly figure out how to be self-sufficient.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:28 pm to kingbob
quote:
Second, no one involved actually wants this, not the Palestinians, not the Gazans,
They've been offered a state by the British, again in 1947, 1967, 2000, and 2008, and have rejected it every time.
quote:
4th Rejection
In 2000, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak met at Camp David, with Palestinian Liberation Organization Chairman Nasser Arafat, to conclude a new two-state plan. Barak offered Arafat a Palestinian state in all of Gaza, and 94% of the West Bank, with East Jerusalem as its capital. But the Palestinian leader rejected the offer.
In the words of U.S. President Bill Clinton, “Arafat was here 14 days and said no to everything.”
Instead, the Palestinians launched a bloody wave of suicide bombings that killed over 1,000 Israelis and maimed thousands more, on buses, in wedding halls, and in pizza parlors.
5th Rejection
In 2008, Israel tried yet again. Prime Minister Ehud Omar went even further than Ehud Barak had, expanding the peace offer to include additional land to sweeten the deal. Like his predecessor, the new Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, turned the deal down.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:30 pm to PsychTiger
quote:Like Beirut used to be!
Wipe out both sides and make it a vacation destination for the rest of the world.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:38 pm to Champagne
One side needs to wipe the other side out for a proper solution.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 1:57 pm to Champagne
pro: it calms down the muzzies for a time
con: we still have muzzies there and they will start up again. from the river to the sea is the only goal thay have.
con: we still have muzzies there and they will start up again. from the river to the sea is the only goal thay have.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:01 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Pros: It solves the entire problem
It would solve nothing. They will never coexist peacefully next to each other.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:13 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
How about a Zero State Solution. Wipe out both sides and make it a vacation destination for the rest of the world.
No way I’d vacation there. I’d be too afraid that me and my family would be cursed in the immediate and generations to come.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:19 pm to Champagne
The equivalent they just want to get married, it’s never ends
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:55 pm to Champagne
We should just start sending weapons to Palestine to expedite the situation.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 2:57 pm to theliontamer
What do they have now? Is it not a quasi two state situation?
Popular
Back to top

15







