- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | USA  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2087 |
| Registered on: | 5/14/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Ron Paul, M.D. - The Hegseth Killings Must Stop.
Posted by Nurbis on 12/9/25 at 5:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What did you search, specifically? Like the copy/paste query terms
I searched "do cartels have armies?"
We all know they do. I don't know why people are pretending they suddenly don't know anything about cartels.
0
quote:
This would not make them a combatant under the law of armed conflict. A terrorist that has taken up arms is different.
Per Google AI - Yes, major cartels function like private armies, possessing highly-trained, well-armed paramilitary forces (hitmen, sicarios) that use military tactics, advanced weaponry (including custom vehicles like narco-tanks), and organized command structures, often recruiting ex-military personnel, to control territory, fight rivals, and enforce their drug empires.
While not state armies, these organized, armed groups effectively operate as powerful, non-state military forces controlling vast regions and challenging government authority.
re: Ron Paul, M.D. - The Hegseth Killings Must Stop.
Posted by Nurbis on 12/9/25 at 2:42 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
that the Administration claims is smuggling drugs
We need to drop these descriptors as if we don't know who these people are. We know they are trafficking drugs. If you want to argue that their actions are not worthy of lethal strikes, then make that case, but let's quit pretending there is some uncertainty about who these people are.
And let's quit pretending there is some moral difference between bombing drug smugglers and bombing some goat fricker in the Middle East. Cartel drugs have killed far more Americans than any Middle East terrorist ever has. They are both worthy. The difference in the arguments is based on who is in the Oval Office.
Trump wants to kill the cartels, and Obama armed them. Somehow, Trump catches more heat than Obama ever did.
re: Jennifer Welch (who?) says Erika Kirk is a grifter and should be kicked to the curb
Posted by Nurbis on 12/9/25 at 2:23 pm to Sassafrasology
quote:
I’ve never heard of Jennifer Welch until now. She sounds like a nasty woman.
She is becoming really popular as a voice for the left. She is an absolute count.
re: CNN Can Not Understand Why We Can Not Arrest The Drug Runners and Bring Them to Trial.
Posted by Nurbis on 12/7/25 at 5:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Nah, just wiser than you and able to understand the difference between an actual terrorist kingpin vs run of the mill drug runners.
So as long as we are killing somebody you deem worthy, then it is okay.
And we never dropped bombs on terrorist foot soldiers, right? Just the kingpins? And we never killed civilians as acceptable collateral damage to get to a worthy target?
And even though the drugs these cartel runners are trafficking will kill many people, that is okay because they are not kingpins?
re: CNN Can Not Understand Why We Can Not Arrest The Drug Runners and Bring Them to Trial.
Posted by Nurbis on 12/7/25 at 4:42 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
How do we know that happened and if he was armed?
Bin Laden wasn't armed. The SEALS admitted to that. We also did not tell Pakistan we were going to enter their country, put boots on the ground, and kill their people. But nobody questions it because it was Bin Laden, and it was a boost for Obama's reelection.
I have no issue with the Bin Laden raid, but also have no issue with going after cartels. But for whatever reason, some on this board see a difference between the two, and we all know the difference is their TDS.
quote:
Armed agents harassed a US citizen and chased her into her home.
It was an interaction of less than 5 seconds. All the guy said was ma'am and she ran. Notice he did not even step onto the property, let alone kick in the door and drag her out. What illegal action are you implying they did here?
She and you both don't even know if he was going to arrest her or just ask her questions. Almost certainly the latter. You are acting as if some miscarriage of justice took place when nothing of the sort happened.
Of course, when a leftist judge lets a man with multiple felonies walk free, and then he murders a woman on a train or sets a woman on fire, you have nothing to say.
re: Dem Senator Reed is defending narco-t*rrorists saying it’s just the way they make money
Posted by Nurbis on 12/4/25 at 11:21 am to UncleLogger
quote:
He’s saying that the frickers in those drug boats aren’t Pablo Escobar or El Chapo but hired hands.
No shite. We know what he is saying, and it is retarded. The people who run the drugs and commit murders for the cartels are hired hands. Nobody believed Escobar ran the entire enterprise himself. If you take money to traffic drugs, then you are a drug trafficker. You are not innocent.
That is like arguing that a hitman who took money to kill somebody is innocent, and only the person who hired him is guilty.
re: Dem Senator Reed is defending narco-t*rrorists saying it’s just the way they make money
Posted by Nurbis on 12/4/25 at 11:12 am to Placekicker
His comment is even dumber than the post title suggests. He said narco traffickers are not in those boats. The actual traffickers hire people to run the boats, and the people in the boats are just trying to make money.
It is retard Democrat logic arguing that people willingly accepting money to take part in a criminal enterprise are somehow innocent pawns because OMB.
It is retard Democrat logic arguing that people willingly accepting money to take part in a criminal enterprise are somehow innocent pawns because OMB.
re: HPV vaccine the second most dangerous vaccine after the jabs
Posted by Nurbis on 12/2/25 at 2:26 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
But he sure didn't stop 90% of corporate employers from mandating the shots OR RISK FIRINGS
The vaccine was first released at the end of Trump's presidency and was limited to the elderly and people with at-risk health issues until early 2021.
Corporate mandates were not a thing until well after Biden took office.
quote:
or relaxing hardline restrictions from routine life participation and at almost every entertainment venue
CNN — President Donald Trump is calling for college football games to resume this season, as athletic conferences consider canceling or postponing play due to the coronavirus pandemic.
ABC - President Donald Trump has been clear about where he stands in the debate over whether schools should resume in-person learning amid the global pandemic, tweeting Monday in all-caps that “SCHOOLS MUST OPEN IN THE FALL!!!”
NYT - President Trump told the nation’s governors on Thursday that they could begin reopening businesses, restaurants and other elements of daily life by May 1 or earlier if they wanted to, but abandoned his threat to use what he had claimed was his absolute authority to impose his will on them.
re: HPV vaccine the second most dangerous vaccine after the jabs
Posted by Nurbis on 12/2/25 at 2:16 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
How that guy Houdini'd his way out of fathering the Covid vaccine in the eyes of his devout fans is one of the most amazing feats ever recorded.
Trump wasn't in the lab creating the vaccine himself. Trump has always maintained that if you want to take it, you can, but nobody should be forced.
Biden forced people to choose between the vaccine and their jobs and made veiled threats towards people who refused to take it.
That is why Biden gets shite on for the vaccine, and Trump does not.
The whole concept is retarded. It is acceptable to fire one missile and attempt to kill everybody, but a second one is a crime. What kind of rationale is that?
re: NYT is disputing wapo story that Hegseth ordered survivors killed
Posted by Nurbis on 12/2/25 at 12:02 am to Bama Mountain
quote:
Bin Laden was armed, as were several others in his compound.
Some people in the compound were armed. Bin Laden was not. Literally, a ten-second Google search will prove that out.
re: NYT is disputing wapo story that Hegseth ordered survivors killed
Posted by Nurbis on 12/1/25 at 8:22 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
That category includes enemy fighters who have surrendered or are otherwise defenseless and pose no threat.
So, when Osama Bin Laden was shot in the head while unarmed in his compound, that was a war crime? Since Obama, Clinton, Biden, and numerous others were in the situation room giving orders and watching as the mission was carried out, they are all guilty, correct?
re: What are the Pros and Cons of a Palestinian Two-State Solution?
Posted by Nurbis on 12/1/25 at 2:01 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Pros: It solves the entire problem
It would solve nothing. They will never coexist peacefully next to each other.
re: Mark Kelly-Hegseth the least qualified secretary of defense in the history of our country.
Posted by Nurbis on 12/1/25 at 2:02 am to Bama Mountain
quote:
It is clear to any reasonable person that Lloyd Austin is vastly more qualified for the job than Whiskey Pete.
The guy who was in charge during the Afghanistan withdrawal?
The guy who was in charge when military enlistment hit a 40-year low?
The guy who disappeared for several days and never told anybody?
The guy who had military ad campaigns featuring soldiers talking about their two moms?
This guy?
Oh yes, vastly more qualified.
quote:
And if the damage was enough to collapse the building, it would have happened when it hit.
Did both towers collapse when they were hit or later?
Also, in the Oklahoma City Building, notice that the giant columns at the four corners of the building are still intact.
The OKC building and WTC 7 were built from different materials.
There was no raging fire in the Oklahoma City Building.
The OKC building was 9 floors vs 47 for the WTC 7 building, which means a frick ton more weight to carry when you start taking out its foundation.
quote:
I've seen the damage, it was minimal and did no damage to it's core.
There was significant damage to the base of the building. That is not minimal damage.
That BLM picture looks fake. Why would you take a random picture at a social event surrounded by white people and plaster BLM crap all over it?
I don't care either way. Even if it is real, being young and naive and falling victim to the daily propaganda pushed on her by schools and media doesn't mean she deserved it. The judges who keep letting guys like this go free are the ones who deserve it.
I don't care either way. Even if it is real, being young and naive and falling victim to the daily propaganda pushed on her by schools and media doesn't mean she deserved it. The judges who keep letting guys like this go free are the ones who deserve it.
quote:
Who feeds us this stuff on social media is what we should be asking.
You read this story, and your first thought is we need more control on how informed American citizens are? It is a NY Post article about a guy being jailed for exercising his 2nd amendment rights. No part of the story is sensationalized.
The guy's choices were to defend himself and go to jail, or not defend himself and possibly die.
The mugger had 15 prior arrests but was still walking free. So while the city is refusing to keep violent criminals behind bars, they are also restricting innocent Americans from their ability to defend themself from these criminals. And now they choose to be tough on crime against the guy who was forced into this situation because of the city's failures.
This is Democrat governance in its purest form.
re: Caroline Kennedy’s daughter has terminal cancer
Posted by Nurbis on 11/22/25 at 5:27 pm to retired_tiger
quote:
and his failures in office
Which failures?
Popular
24
