Nosevens

Whoops I guess not right

“US embassy in Ukraine warns of 'potentially significant air attack' that could happen in next 24 hours”

Gas prices may by high temporarily but if there is a chance to conclude Iran’s stranglehold then press hard then harder

“Notably, at the end of the trust's one-hundred-year term, Wisner expressly granted all of the trust's immovable property to the City of New Orleans”

This is either an opinion or decision, but I would like to see the original wording for them to come to that conclusion. The simple fact of the sunset clause of 100 years either purposely or statutory would have exact wording of ownership. If it declared public entities only then heirs are out. If it didn’t specify public entities specifically then heirs have a vested stake and of course if it addresses heirs then entities are out. That Tulane rejected their 12% and LSU hasn’t been mentioned suggests to me that something odd happened as Tulane is not going to deny receiving funds but they also aren’t going to spend good money chasing questionable money either. They could have said nothing and let it play out.

Tackling the fraud could solve a lot of issues it seems

That guy was not a friend but an employee, good employee but just an employee. I was a bit surprised when call came but I guess his needs overweighted his embarrassment. Never ever had a work issue afterwards in the years after.

Catch 22 on Cali as fast counts will draw questions on how they were able too

Had an employee once who checked into a room after meeting a gal and grabbed a handful hiding. It ended up robbing him, taking his clothes. Called me of all people to please bring him some clothes to leave hotel room. Funny but yet not

Saw 2 versions of interpretations, both look to be opinions of 100 years later. Those being that NO, Tulane, LSU & heirs were being paid throughout and the other being NO,LSU & Tulane the bequeathed owners after the 100 years. Those are not the original trust wordings as heirs were apparently getting paid during yet show no inclusion of after the sunset. Again I haven’t seen the original wordings of so obviously just speculation

And as I said that particular piece you showed was not original material but rather decision or argument 100 years later. Quote the original piece if you have access

If they want the ones that look weird here please don’t engage them in stopping

No way is the below statement from the original trust as it talks in past tense, “ Wisner required “ or “ the City held the trust” for example, not future description of use. It most definitely is a draft from decision or lawyers for NO

In establishing this trust, Wisner required the City of New Orleans to use funds generated from its use of the land “for the beautification of New Orleans and for the education, health and recreation of the city residents.” As the trust's principal beneficiary, the City held the trust corpus and would receive the bulk of the trust's revenue. Wisner named three income beneficiaries: Tulane University, Charity Hospital, and the Salvation Army. Wisner named the Mayor of New Orleans as trustee. Notably, at the end of the trust's one-hundred-year term, Wisner expressly granted all of the trust's immovable property to the City of New Orleans.

As I mentioned only the original wording of the original trust means anything, everything is is but one sides opinion or final decision, which sometimes has been known to be incorrect