Started By
Message

re: We now have the dissent of Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas

Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:00 am to
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

But some moron on this board (we all know who) said SCOTUS only rules when a case is appropriately brought before them.


What are you talking about?? He clearly is a better legal mind than Thomas and Alito...just listen to him, hell tell you
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49533 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

But some moron on this board (we all know who) said SCOTUS only rules when a case is appropriately brought before them. That's why they couldn't halt the irreparable harm created by the COVID shot mandate, according to that moron. Apparently that only matters when it hurts America.

Nor could anyone establish "standing" while convoys of vehicles where dumping reams of ballots into the counting centers without any custodial certification.

But that only mattered because a simple thing like the presidency was at stake - not to worry!!!!

In this case we have an alien terrorist gang member who, somewhere in the years long process of capturing him someone mislabeled a piece of paper which went undetected over the weekend, and therefore we have to bring the entire process of removing the 30 million illegal aliens the prior administration (only in power because of the 'lack of standing' to confront the election theft) allowed to walk into the county!!

Even if it take DECADES to remove all the ILLEGAL ALIEN FELONs the prior (unvetted) administration who were ALSO put onto voter registration rolls (again - nobody had that hard to establish 'standing')
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 10:09 am
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5326 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

You’re conflating the merits of the AEA and BCreed’s assertion


I'm just responding to the specific statement I quoted: "Like when the Administration has already renditioned litigants out of the country and the jurisdiction of US Courts and then claimed laughable impotency to return them?"

My interpretation is that those people were not litigants because they had no standing as litigants. Whether the administration had the ability to return them is irrelevant, because it had no reponsibility to return them.


This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 10:07 am
Posted by SaintsTiger
1,000,000 Posts
Member since Oct 2014
2105 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Attorneys for Petitioners
Lee Gelernt
Counsel of Record
American Civil Liberties Union
125 Broad St. New York, NY 10004-2400
LGELERNT@ACLU.ORG
2125492616
Party name: A.A.R.P., et al.


First Amendment purposes
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 10:10 am
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41326 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

He clearly is a better legal mind than Thomas and Alito...just listen to him, hell tell you


Clarence Thomas has 30 IQ points on SFP

Dude has forgotten more about law than he will ever know.
This post was edited on 4/20/25 at 10:09 am
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91528 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Remove the hold and send him back. Very simple solution.
100% serious question.

Do democrats have to play by these specific rules as well? I could be severely propagandized by right wing grifters, but I just don’t see the Dems having to deal with this stuff. At least not nearly to this level.

I don’t see you and Slow this focused on procedural shite like this when it comes to the left. How’d these people get in the damn country? I didn’t see pushback from y’all when they were pouring in. Surely they weren’t doing it legally.

I just don’t understand what’s going on at this point. It feels like one side gets to act almost unopposed while not catching shite from you or the media, while the other side gets stopped at every turn AND catches shite.
Posted by PhtevenWithaV
Member since Jul 2022
1066 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:11 am to
This, no one with half a brain wants that illegal out of a cell in this country, they just don't want us to ignore the law because its inconvenient. Because some day the shoe will be on the other foot and we know someone like AOC would take it as a blank check. Bring his arse back, keep him locked up remove the hold and ship him right back. It's a waste of time and money but if we had just done it in the first place this shite would all be long over.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12350 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Why put forth much effort at all to retrieve a MS-13 gang member just so he can be deported again?

El Salvador doesn't seem interested in giving him up.

Maybe we could pressure/bribe them to return this guy. But why would we?


The answer to why is because that is what the court decided, and the courts decisions are respected in our country. That is how we preserve our judicial branch.

It doesn’t matter if it’s a ham sandwich or a steak dinner.

The oath to protect the Constitution is a solemn vow taken by individuals entering public office in the United States, including members of Congress, the President, and federal judges.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55575 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:12 am to
quote:

But some moron on this board (we all know who) said SCOTUS only rules when a case is appropriately brought before them. That's why they couldn't halt the irreparable harm created by the COVID shot mandate, according to that moron.

Does Alito post on this board? I bet you would not call him a moron to his face.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91528 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:13 am to
quote:

The answer to why is because that is what the court decided, and the courts decisions are respected in our country. That is how we preserve our judicial branch.
Is the left doing this?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:14 am to
quote:

focused on procedural shite like this


Critical theory is one of the dominant ideas in our law schools. And critical theory only destroys. It can’t build anything. Just like the rest of Marxism.

So you’ll see no positive ideas coming from legal scholars (and their imposters). Only criticism and the application of critical theory ideas.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
19986 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:15 am to
5 of 9
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence


Dumb and Dumber
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:15 am to
quote:

courts decisions are respected in our country.


They’re not. And with good reason.

quote:

The oath to protect the Constitution is a solemn vow taken by individuals entering public office in the United States, including members of Congress, the President, and federal judges.


Huge lolz.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82403 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:19 am to
quote:

It’s what protects us all from President AOC doing whatever she wants.


Well it didn't protect us from Joe Biden doing whatever the hell he wanted. His willful disregard the process is what allowed millions of illegal to stream into this country and created this problem in the first place.

And now the problem is so big the only way to solve it is by going out the same door we came in. Unfricking the damage that Biden did is going to cause some mistakes to be made. This guy in El Salvador is just another casualty of Joe Biden's lawlessness.

Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
9139 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:20 am to
Thomas should have been promoted to chief justice instead of a new, untested Roberts. He’s not up for the job.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28582 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:20 am to
The Administration shot the middle finger to the Court after the unanimous ruling. The Administration’s position is that they can launch flights before the courts can act, and that once the flights are in the air, there is no way to repair the harm caused.

Equally quick action by the Court is merited under this circumstance.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128843 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Well it didn't protect us from Joe Biden doing whatever the hell he wanted. His willful disregard the process is what allowed millions of illegal to stream into this country and created this problem in the first place.


The “be careful what you wish for” crowd seems to be largely forgetful that it doesn’t matter if we play “by the rules.” The left isn’t going to.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15718 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Yes. The “process” is the rule of law. It’s what protects us all from President AOC doing whatever she wants. It’s amazing how you guys can’t see that.


The process has already played out. He’s an illegal who’s been deported to his native country. It makes zero sense to bring him back only to get the same result. And you know damn good and well the minute he came back the democrats would file lawsuit after lawsuit to keep him from being deported again.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28167 posts
Posted on 4/20/25 at 10:23 am to
quote:

It doesn’t matter if it’s a ham sandwich or a steak dinner.


Let's say El Savador wants a billion to release this guy.

You're saying we should spend a billion for him?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram