ReauxlTide222

-17

re: Turns out deportations solve basically all our problems

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 4:14 pm to TenWheelsForJesus

quote:
Another one who has to deny reality to appease his emotions.

What do you mean by this?

-4

re: Has there ever been more pressure on a first year head coach?

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 3:00 pm to RebelExpress38

There’s less pressure on him now.

LSU fans are firmly with him.

re: Why does Kiffin feel he always has to be the ringleader of a circus clown show

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 2:58 pm to cajunbama

He’s a narcissist

re: When did people start losing their shiit and act like this in public ?

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 2:53 pm to GatorOnAnIsland

quote:
I don’t recall seeing this in the 60’s thru the early 2000’s.

Did you not have Twitter yet?

re: CFP issues statement in support of conferences, but does not ban teams with 5for5 players

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 1:52 pm to Chef Curry

quote:
Which of these players were on a 53 man NFL roster?

I would guess zero

re: CFP issues statement in support of conferences, but does not ban teams with 5for5 players

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 1:44 pm to The Pirate King

quote:
where are all the posters here who claimed the CFP was going to come in and save the day?

I mean, this reads as “you better not be on the bubble if you play NFL guys” to me.

re: Can We Keep a Running Tally of Whose Side Everyone is On?

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 1:40 pm to Roll Tide Ravens

quote:
I’m just on the side of stopping the chaos in college sports. I don’t really care about the outcome of the LSU/SEC lawsuits. I hope this situation will spur some change to rein in the chaos, though.

This

I want LSU to keep pushing this as hard as they can and I don’t want them to be punished in the slightest for it.

If we can’t all shake hands and tell 2022 guys to kick rocks, what’s happening now is the best outcome, given it leads to some of the truly nonsensical stuff being buried in the past.

-1

re: Turns out deportations solve basically all our problems

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 1:27 pm to Lsujacket66

Is any of that happening at a rate that would be explained by the small amount of deported illegals?

That seems like gay right wing Twitter slop.

re: Clancy Trial declared a Mistrial

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 12:40 pm to RobertFootball

quote:
Women are gonna pay for this for decades to come. Mark my words.

I sure fricking hope so

re: Trump has brought us the lightest federal workforce in American history

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 10:09 am to SlowFlowPro

quote:
What good is this if our deficits are surpassing $2T?

Per your own standards, this would qualify for not staying on topic.

Why aren’t you staying on topic?

Now you’re talking about deficits + Kamala.

That is way out of bounds per the standards you hold posters to.

re: Female line judge in the CU/GT game

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/4/26 at 7:08 am to Dr RC

quote:
To be fair, she made a really damn good call on a bobbled sideline pass earlier.

That’s not being fair at all.

Good calls and bad calls for a ref should not be weighted the same.

More Sports

re: 2026 Other Games Thread

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 9:25 pm to BamaLoop00

Any of the Alabama guys doing anything? I think they have 5.

Alabama Sports Board

re: CNN invents a way to make Nepal landslide/flood Trump's fault

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 7:49 pm to uggabugga

Ok say they’re 100% spot on.

Are we supposed to be outraged that we aren’t paying for Nepalese landslide detection?

Jesus Christ, liberals

re: Maybe the SEC is desperate to keep up the illusion that the players are amateur students

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 3:41 pm to weagle1999

Say a 2021 player turned pro after playing 4 seasons. Did the mini camp thing and didn’t catch on.

New rule is 5 for 5.

What’s keeping that player from suing and getting that 5th college season back?

I guess I’m asking why 2022 guys should be covered by the new rule when they left months ago. What sets them apart from the 2021 guy?

What in the world are 2022 guys owed? They fully completed their agreed upon eligibility. They’re gone. New rule comes down. Why are we even entertaining them coming back?

Wouldn’t this shite be irrelevant if we didn’t let the 2022 kids come back after exhausting all of their eligibility?

More Sports

-4

re: Don't allow your hate for LSU and LK stop you from having common sense....

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 10:54 am to Mbeloso

quote:
five years has passed from their window

So? They were not given the opportunity to play that 5th year. They would have made different decisions if they knew they had that 5th year, no?

quote:
in 2016 you had 5 years to play 4. Their five year window has passed

And now they can play 5. Those guys didn’t know or have the ability, so they didn’t play 5.

But now guys can.

Why can’t 2016 folks come get their 5th playing season?

-1

re: Don't allow your hate for LSU and LK stop you from having common sense....

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 10:53 am to Milk

quote:
This is a 1 year issue that could have been prevented had NCAA passed the rule in January.

Why are they obligated to make the rule in January?

Why can’t 2021 kids return who didn’t play their 5 years?

Would they not be owed that year just as much as 2022 guys?

-1

re: Don't allow your hate for LSU and LK stop you from having common sense....

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 10:43 am to Mbeloso

quote:
For a kid who graduated hs in 2022, that would mean that you have another year until you hit the 5 year window. 2022-2027, five years

But that wasn’t the rule..

I don’t understand why you think this should allow 2022 guys to come back.

Serious question, why can’t 2021 guys come back?

quote:
For a kid who graduated hs in 2022, that would mean that you have another year until you hit the 5 year window

But why? Why do they get a 5th year? That wasn’t the rule then.

What if someone in 2016 went pro after 4 years? They might not have made that decision if 5 for 5 was a rule. Why can’t they come back?

quote:
The NCAA passed a rule after guys "left" school, keep in mind they have no other option if they wanted to keep playing football. The mistake is on the NCAA.

How was it a mistake?

quote:
They were excluded from the 5 for 5 rule and are currently not employed by the NFL.

Were 2021 guys excluded? How can any new rule be implemented moving forward?

-2

re: Clancy trial verdict predictions

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 10:32 am to stout

quote:
So the rumor is its the two younger chicks holding up the whole thing

What are the odds they’re setting up a heroic social media influencer career based on their not guilty verdicts?

They’d surely stand to gain quite a bit from holding out and then marketing themselves accordingly.

I say at least 15% chance.

O-T Lounge

re: Lindsay Clancy's case should take care of any chance of having a woman POTUS

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 9:30 am to Hateradedrink

quote:
Anyone thinking the Lindsay Clancy trial is some sort of preview of female leadership is a moron. Any “lesson” here could be applied to anyone. shite guys have you heard of this Jeffry Dahmer guy??? He doesn’t seem very fit for leadership *tsk*

Dude please stop being a fricking idiot for one second.

Didn’t Dahmer eat faces? Surely he was out of his fricking mind.

Did you see men supporting him and hoping he returns safely to society where we’d eventually make him our representative? Were men making excuses for him?

How long did it take the jury to sentence him to death?

This is all 100% to do with the reaction. We can’t even have a conversation with you if you’re going to come with this level of argument. Holy shite man.

re: Lindsay Clancy's case should take care of any chance of having a woman POTUS

Posted by ReauxlTide222 on 9/3/26 at 9:20 am to 4cubbies

quote:
Using your logic, why wouldn’t any of the heinous crimes committed by men (who commit the overwhelming majority of all violent and sexual crimes globally across world history) prohibit them from holding positions of power?

The actual crime isn’t the issue.

Nobody is saying “women shouldn’t hold power because Lindsay Clancy strangled her 3 children one by one by one with some type of wire after setting up the opportunity by planning her husbands absence from the house.”

We’re observing the reaction by women and thinking *holy frick we were right about women this whole time*

You don’t see men making any excuses for men who kill their children. And they get the death penalty. While y’all are trying to make this bitch famous. I wouldn’t be surprised if the holdouts on the jury are also doing it for eventual internet fame.

Women are fricking up so hard out here.