Started By
Message

Turns out ComDani's tax on $5 million properties actually applies to $1 million condos too

Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:00 am
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
69400 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:00 am
Posted by Gifman
Captiva, FL
Member since Jan 2021
19481 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:02 am to
So that’s a good chunk
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48192 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:02 am to
quote:

The average selling price of a condominium in New York City varies heavily by borough and size, with Manhattan averages generally ranging from roughly $1.9 million to over $2.7 million for overall sales, and a Manhattan median condo price around $1.25 million.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
69400 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:03 am to
Posted by TigerBaitOohHaHa
Member since Jan 2023
2222 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:04 am to
I'm surprised there are any units in NYC that are UNDER $1M.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67352 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:05 am to
That makes this essentially a tax on everyone.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
6779 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:07 am to
And to think, there are idiots who dwell amongst us who think this guy and his ideas are awesome.
Posted by Helo
Orlando
Member since Nov 2004
4819 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:07 am to
Gotta close that gap!
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
22073 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

That makes this essentially a tax on everyone.


Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
69400 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

That makes this essentially a tax on everyone.

Who knew 30% off government cheese would cost basically everyone who owns property in NYC.
Posted by theliontamer
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2015
2184 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:08 am to
Are the people in Brooklyn subject to these taxes also? Seems like a lot of the 1st time home buying millennials from the city bought out there.
Posted by theCrusher
Slidell
Member since Nov 2007
1802 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:09 am to
I'd wager any property he or his family owns is outside of the tax threshold.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67352 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:11 am to
quote:

And to think, there are idiots who dwell amongst us who think this guy and his ideas are awesome.


We really should implement intelligence tests before allowing people to vote.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
20216 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:11 am to
How can they impose these taxes without having voted for it
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85683 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:15 am to
Well that is interesting... the old bait and switch.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
69400 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:15 am to
quote:

We really should implement intelligence tests before allowing people to vote.

I'd love to see a successful socialist or communist environment (good for everyone) that exists outside of a capitalist incubator.

Hint: it doesn't exist
This post was edited on 7/28/26 at 11:17 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481151 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:17 am to
quote:

That makes this essentially a tax on everyone.


I don't think "everyone" has 2nd properties in NYC

This tax is stupid, but I get why they have the lower threshhold for co-ops. Those are typically cheaper than regular apartments.

Why Co-ops Are Cheaper — and Why That Matters

quote:

Co-ops make up roughly 70–75% of all residential buildings in New York City. That abundance, combined with the restrictions that come with co-op ownership, is a primary driver of the price difference buyers see in the market.

When you purchase a co-op, you're not buying real property — you're buying shares in a corporation that owns the building. Those shares give you the right to occupy a specific apartment, but they come with a layer of governance that condominiums simply don't have. That governance — the board approval process, the subletting restrictions, the financial requirements — narrows the buyer pool. And a narrower buyer pool means lower prices.


quote:

The lower purchase price on a co-op doesn't always translate directly to lower monthly costs. This is one of the most commonly misunderstood aspects of the co-op vs. condo comparison.

In a co-op, monthly maintenance fees typically include property taxes and, in some cases, a portion of the building's underlying mortgage. Because the corporation owns the building as one entity, expenses are shared across all shareholders. This is why co-op listings show a single monthly figure — it bundles what condo buyers pay separately.


Now, why you'd have a co-op as your 2nd property, I don't know.
This post was edited on 7/28/26 at 11:18 am
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
69400 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:18 am to
quote:

This tax is stupid, but I get why they have it for co-ops

So you're just ignoring the condominium piece of this
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27529 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:19 am to
I would say, good, you got what you voted for. But that would be a lie because we now know they didn't actually elect him.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6620 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:20 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram