- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Trump will be naming a conservative female to the SCOTUS very soon.“
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:51 pm to ThePTExperience1969
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:51 pm to ThePTExperience1969
quote:
Amy Coney Barrett
*gasp*
1
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:52 pm to AggieHank86
misleading thread title but you don't care.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:30 pm to MrCarton
quote:
So Jews, Muslims, and Gays would be massively over represented, while White Christians would be underrepresented...
Makes sense.
Demographics are heading that way arent they
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:49 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
I think the difficulty of confirming a sane justice to replace that raving lunatic Ginsburg is real, and the nominee has to have some characteristics that can protect them from the media/dnc slander fabrication machine.
To some degree nominating a woman does that
No it doesn't.
It's worse. They see you as a total traitor if you're a Conservative woman...just like a Conservative black man.
They go after them worse then if you were just some plain white Conservative male.
They see it as a betrayal and have to make an example out of you so the public can see that you are a pariah in society and this is not how women or black people should think and behave.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:53 pm to MrCarton
quote:
o Jews, Muslims, and Gays would be massively over represented, while White Christians would be underrepresented...
In his example, the three groups you feel are "overrepresented", would be outvoted by the other 6.
Also, it bears noting that faith association does not always equal being on your side (dem or gop).
Certain issues will always hit a gray area will faith based allegiance may lose out to other interests. This is why I agree with the Originalism school of thought.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:54 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
Gays
quote:
Demographics are heading that way
These two things seem to be mutually exclusive. How does the population of gays increase naturally?
Posted on 4/23/19 at 2:36 pm to tarzana
At great risk of getting flamed, while I think ACB would be a fantastic pick (bc I'm an originalist), outside the box, I would love a look at Condoleza Rice. She checks a multitude of boxes. Being brilliant is one of them.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 3:03 pm to dafif
Condi Rice would be an excellent choice
Posted on 4/23/19 at 3:20 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
I do think a qualified female candidate would be advantageous on multiple fronts
Sure thing, anyone could agree with that point.
BUT, if the No. 3 or 4 choice was a young, white dude who liked to party in college and was popular with the ladies, it would be hard to pass on the obvious shitstorm guaranteed to follow such a nominee.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 3:26 pm to cajunangelle
quote:How can it be misleading, when I put it in quotes and specifically stated that it was language I pulled from another thread?
misleading thread title but you don't care.
To be very honest, you were one of the posters that I see is constantly looking for something to be upset about.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 3:28 pm to tarzana
More people, also more people not feeling like they have to live by an orientation that is not naturally them.
Humans are best when they are their freest -- isn't that a form our republicanism -- roll back regulations and laws
didnt our founders move here to be able to be their truest, freest selves?
Humans are best when they are their freest -- isn't that a form our republicanism -- roll back regulations and laws
didnt our founders move here to be able to be their truest, freest selves?
Posted on 4/23/19 at 3:32 pm to AggieHank86
As long as it’s not another moderate like Sandra Day O’Connor
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:43 pm to AggieHank86
If you listened to the news dumbass you would know that Trump said he would replace Ginsburg withg Amy Coney Barrett, who happens to be a female, but is pro life and one the most conservative candidates out there.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:52 pm to AggieHank86
RBG ain't leaving or dying before Trump loses in 2020.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:53 pm to Geauxst Writer
quote:
RBG ain't dying before 2020.
I see you've crunched the numbers.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:58 pm to AggieHank86
No worries, Proggy Hank.
I have no doubt the pro-woman Proggies are going to be supportive of her, since she is a female.
No doubt there will be no calls for violence against her and her family.
I also doubt the left won't make up some fantasy about her being some sort of terrorist felon in 30 years ago with an incident that didn't happen.
I have no doubt the pro-woman Proggies are going to be supportive of her, since she is a female.
No doubt there will be no calls for violence against her and her family.
I also doubt the left won't make up some fantasy about her being some sort of terrorist felon in 30 years ago with an incident that didn't happen.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:00 pm to tarzana
quote:
*gasp*
I hear she's a huge Easter worshipper
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:05 pm to StrongSafety
You are a complete idiot. A supreme court quota system that will make everyone mad. Appoint the most qualified man or woman that agrees with the president's philosophy.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:09 pm to AggieHank86
Okay, but I fully support the appointment of the female I think he's going to appoint, so I'm good with it.
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:14 pm to rebelrouser
If Trump plans to nominate another Supreme Court justice, he’d better hope one comes open in the next 6 months.. i mean, since McConnell laid down the law at the end of Barry’s last term that a new justice cant be confirmed in the last year of a President’s term (and we dont know if Trump will win another), then we cant in good conscience change the rules arbitrarily , can we?
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News