Started By
Message

re: “Trump will be naming a conservative female to the SCOTUS very soon.“

Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:42 am to
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47609 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:42 am to
quote:

I hope that Trump picks another name off the Heritage/Federalist list, but that it is NOT a woman.



Why? So you can personally gay metoo them?
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
18000 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:44 am to
Ideally, my SC would be comprised of:

1 Chief Justice -- best person for the job

1 White Christian Conservative
1 Black Christian Conservative
1 White Christian Liberal
1 Black Christian Liberal
1 Jewish Conservative/Liberal
1 Asian/Muslim Conservative/Liberal
1 Latino Conservative/Liberal
1 Atheist/Agnostic/Native American/Gay
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
38457 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:45 am to
quote:

StrongSafety




quote:

Y'all know Easter is becoming pretty commercial and secular right? I say that as a Christian. Did he bombers bomb a church? If so then I will change my opinion on it
Posted by ithad2bme
Houston transplant from B.R.
Member since Sep 2008
3686 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:46 am to
The real question is will Dems still use the strategy of branding every Repub nominee as a sexual predator?
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
18000 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:47 am to
Just addressed it.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:49 am to
quote:

ability to apply facts to the law.
I would hope that a judge would instead apply the law to the facts.

Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
17427 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:52 am to
My hope is for Amy Barrett. Not because she is a woman but because she is a solid conservative who will honor the Constitution, which is something a liberal judge wouldn't do if their damn life depended on it.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117589 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:52 am to
It would be more difficult for the Dems to slander a female nominee like they did Kavanaugh. I'd like to see them charge her with raping a bunch of boys at a party.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
38457 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Just addressed it.


No, you lied. It is, quite literally, impossible to not know that churches were bombed.

Literally every. Single. Article. Every. Single. News story. They ALL state that churches were bombed.

For you to NOT know that, you would have to be 100% completely isolated from all human contact. Which, since you were commenting in the thread as it happened, proves not to be the case.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
18000 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:55 am to
quote:

No, you lied. It is, quite literally, impossible to not know that churches were bombed


I didnt read a single clip about it. Just saw the initial tweet about 50 dead sunday morning in a bombing. figured it was islamic radicals based on the location, went about my day.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
38457 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:56 am to
quote:

didnt read a single clip about it. Just saw the initial tweet about 50 dead sunday morning in a bombing. figured it was islamic radicals based on the location, went about my day.


Mnhm. Sure bud. You’re pathetic.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157905 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:57 am to
Holy shite. That's terrible.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 10:57 am to
Every now and then I'll make a serious post, and you guys just laugh at me.


This is why I troll...




Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Ideally, my SC would be comprised of:

1 Chief Justice -- best person for the job

1 White Christian Conservative
1 Black Christian Conservative
1 White Christian Liberal
1 Black Christian Liberal
1 Jewish Conservative/Liberal
1 Asian/Muslim Conservative/Liberal
1 Latino Conservative/Liberal
1 Atheist/Agnostic/Native American/Gay


So Jews, Muslims, and Gays would be massively over represented, while White Christians would be underrepresented...


Makes sense.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Many would argue that part of the equation for "best candidate" is helping the Supreme Court be representative of the country as a whole.



And I would call those people stupid identity-political demagogues.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49534 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:08 pm to
IF we lived in a normal world, I'd agree with you.

But your side never acts in good faith. It is dumb to expect conservatives to follow arbitrary guidelines when your side violates them with impunity and uses them as weapons against conservative.

I would like for DEMOCRATs to actually act in accordance with the constitution - instead of 'their version' of what it 'should' be.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
19297 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:13 pm to
He could nominate a gay, black, conservative woman and still be hated.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28161 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:22 pm to
we really need a black trans female next on the supreme court, just for equality's sake.

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

your side never acts in good faith.
What “side” is that?

The “side” that wants the next nominee to be a strict constructionist, vetted by the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation?

The “side” who just argued AGAINST demographic quotas?
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 12:25 pm
Posted by PickupAutist
Member since Sep 2018
3038 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:49 pm to
You’re right OP, but everyone here won’t listen and are on the Barrett train. Even though we have never had a good female SCJ, ever, and even though she will not be good on immigration considering she has two adopted virtue trophies from a 3rd world country herself. Never mind the crazy eyes and setting the precedent that this seat must forever belong to a woman now. Never mind how we all know women are easily bullied and are very concerned about how they are perceived socially. She will eventually court the favor of liberal opinion. Stupid idea.

I hope trump floats her just to get the left worked up and then puts in another square jawed man. No doubt barett stans would melt over it, but most of trump’s supporters are still defeatist cucks and are always looking for a reason to turn on him (see bombing an empty Syrian airfield, signing the funding bill, and ending the gov shutdown even though he still got the wall $$$).
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram