Started By
Message

re: Trump Administration Used Potential Meeting to Pressure Ukraine on Biden, Texts Show

Posted on 10/4/19 at 3:45 am to
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 3:45 am to
quote:

Text messages




We heard all about this phone call until we read the transcript. Let's stop talking about these text messages and see them. You can bet your arse the longer it takes for us to see them the more likely it's another nothingburger
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139011 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 3:54 am to
quote:

Trump Administration Used Potential Meeting to Pressure Ukraine on Biden, Texts Show
No they don't.

Aside from William Taylor's unsourced, unilateral suppositionals, not a single text in the piece shows that. Not one. Meanwhile, Taylor's missives have nothing to do with Trump's statements and, as was put to him on Sept 8th, are in direct contradiction to what Trump said.

Taylor should absolutely be called in and questioned as to his basis for the Sept 1st and 8th texts. My guess is Taylor's source will prove to be someone connected directly or indirectly to Schiff, the WB, or both.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139011 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 3:57 am to
quote:

Starting to make sense now why Pelosi decided to go forward.
Tell that to her empty-handed underlings who spent hours yesterday in an attempted Volker inquisition.
Posted by KillTheGophers
Member since Jan 2016
6785 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:22 am to
From the article:

quote:

Mr. Sond­land re­sponded that he be­lieved Mr. Tay­lor was “in­correct about Pres­i­dent Trump’s in­ten­tions.” He added: “The Pres­i­dent has been crys­tal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind” and urged that the two “stop the back and forth by text.”
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65806 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:25 am to
Yeah, OP and the Democratic conveniently left of that text reply, lol, that Trump absolutely didn’t want any Quid Pro Quo.....
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
21057 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:29 am to
Explain to me why the president asking for an investigation into reasonably possible corruption is a bad thing. Why is that a problem?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63080 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:29 am to
quote:

You honestly believe Trump would be going to these lengths, asking multiple countries now, to investigate Biden, if Biden wasn’t running against him?


Remember when you used to pretend that you didn't support impeachment?

And, to answer your question, Trump isn't worried about Biden politically. That's probably the biggest lie of everything.

You'd have to have the IQ of a grapefruit to think that Biden has a chance to be elected.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63080 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:31 am to
quote:

Trump is,by far, the dumbest president in US history


...from Rickdaddy
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
13065 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:33 am to
quote:

Mr. Sondland responded that he believed Mr. Taylor was “incorrect about President Trump’s intentions.” He added: “The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind


From the same article that you apparently failed to read?...
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15718 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:34 am to
Did you really just post something from Mueller's testimony that was later corrected but leave out the correction?

Dishonest hack
Posted by DTRooster
Belle River, La
Member since Dec 2013
9052 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:34 am to
So a Miles apologist is also a liberal lemming, shocker
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
50046 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:40 am to
quote:

Starting to make sense now why Pelosi decided to go forward. 


Perhaps in your warped mind, boy.
Posted by Snazzmeister
IHTFP
Member since Jan 2015
1199 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:48 am to
So, is this why Schiff went radio silent yesterday and hasn’t released Volker’s testimony? So they could run a few hit pieces?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139011 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:50 am to
quote:

OP and the Democratic conveniently left of that text reply
The OP and Democrats also conveniently left out the fact prior to any Trump conversation, Biden was already the subject of an active investigation in the Ukraine. Trump knew that. The Ukrainian Prosecutor General reached out to AG Barr concerning Biden months in advance of the July 25 phone call. The OP and Democrats also conveniently failed to mention Sen Chris Murphy threatened to cut off aid if the Ukraine continued its ongoing Biden investigation.
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
53729 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:52 am to
"Potential" "was seeking" etc.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139011 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:03 am to
quote:

"Potential" "was seeking" etc.
quote:

to Pressure Ukraine on Biden, Texts Show
Except there was no "pressure" to investigate Biden, because the investigation was already underway, and the texts show our Ukrainian Chargé d'affaires was confused by Dem interjections regarding a supposed Trump quid pro quo.

The headline is unsupported BS.

But this WSJ 20-something lead author already won a Pulitzer for similarly misleading headlines dealing with the Michael Cohen - Stormy Daniels story.
This post was edited on 10/4/19 at 6:09 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115464 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:06 am to
So the musings of an Obama holdover about his opinions of the President's actions is the smoking gun?

That same holdover that by every account shite the Democrats' cereal bowl yesterday?
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
8218 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:10 am to
I find it amazing how the media manipulates a story to fit the narrative they want to tell. They read something about Trump then they add a bunch of theories to it, they read something about Biden and they blow it off like it was made up. They are bold.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14977 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:14 am to
quote:

Except there was no "pressure" to investigate Biden, because the investigation was already underway, and the texts show our Ukrainian Chargé d'affaires was confused by Dem interjections regarding a supposed Trump quid pro quo.


Well, the WSJ/Wapo/NYT want you to believe something else.

Is anyone else getting fed up with the blatant gaslighting that goes on ever morning after we have witnessed the events unfolding the day before.

The MSM has become unhinged in its coordination with the DNC.

Posted by Snazzmeister
IHTFP
Member since Jan 2015
1199 posts
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:14 am to
Just to be clear, this dude was a Bush appointee who Obama replaces in ‘09. I don’t think he qualifies as a “holdover.”
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram