- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There is no way this $300B surrender package gets through congress
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:21 pm to IMSA_Fan
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:21 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:
There isn’t a representative alive that is running for reelection that can vote for it
I'm confused, I thought we sent billions to Ukraine during the war?
Also, can you tell me about the 1.8 Billion Obama sent to Ukraine and placed into the Privat Bank which then disappeared?
How about that Burisma deal?
We know when Trump tried to look into that he got impeached
0
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:22 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:
Will the people that are telling me I’m stupid please tell me what I’m being stupid about? Like with facts
That pawprint next to your name is a start.....
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:23 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
"I'm starting to think IMSA knows that and is only pretending to be upset. One could be forgiven for thinking he hasn't seen anything official about the deal and is just making shite up. Could his anger here be disingenuous?"
it's the pattern I just spoke to above. It's the new strategy. They start with a position they know is disingenuous and then pretend every time it is explained to them that it isn't explained to them.
After several of these rounds they just run off. Then start the process over again.
They see this as strategy rather than the pathetic position it actually is.
it's the pattern I just spoke to above. It's the new strategy. They start with a position they know is disingenuous and then pretend every time it is explained to them that it isn't explained to them.
After several of these rounds they just run off. Then start the process over again.
They see this as strategy rather than the pathetic position it actually is.
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:24 pm to IMSA_Fan
How much is in the accounts the US has frozen? My guess is this is where it was coming from. Did Congress approve the pallets of cash Obama sent?
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:24 pm to IMSA_Fan
Go to Google and query this. For either Germany or Japan. Was the Japanese surrender in WWII signed as a treaty?
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:24 pm to OldManRiver
We are sending the money through Qatar and their corrupt asses will disburse
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:24 pm to jammajin
Do you honestly believe there will be $0 in taxpayer funds in that $300B?
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:27 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:Followed by 4 non-answer, shithead replies. Typical.
Please educate me on what I am missing?
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:28 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:
Do you honestly believe there will be $0 in taxpayer funds in that $300B?
Yes. Now will you admit you were ignorant as to where that money was coming from?
Can you link your thread detailing how Congress must approve Bidens spending When he exercised PDA powers? TIA
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:28 pm to AC1221
quote:To paraphrase Forrest Gump, "sounded" is as "sounded" does.
Quit deflecting from the fact that you sounded like a dummy about the 300 billion.
Both circle back around to "dummy."
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:30 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:
Do you honestly believe there will be $0 in taxpayer funds in that $300B?
Do you have any information that would suggest otherwise? Personally, I haven't seen anything official from the admin yet as you seem to have done. You found that link yet?
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:31 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:
Do you honestly believe there will be $0 in taxpayer funds in that $300B?
I don't know. I haven't seen the MOU or the final agreement that hasn't been signed yet.
Have you?
I've answered your question honestly. How about if you start answering a few rather than just moving the goalposts around?
Do you honestly believe there will be $300B in taxpayer funds in the $300B? Do you honestly believe that Iran's neighbors will not trade reconstruction funding for actual assurances from an admin they trust that the Iranian nuclear and terror threat has been eliminated?
Have you honestly read the details of this agreement or listened to the full position of Vance discussing it?
Do you honestly believe Congress will be asked to approve $300B?
Have you honestly been this honestly stupid throughout this thread or are you just being disingenuous in order to push a narrative that is not based on fact at all?
thanks in advance for answering others questions honestly
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:33 pm to IMSA_Fan
its not taxpayer money, its not coming from the US
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:34 pm to IMSA_Fan
Purposely retarded or willfully ignorant ?
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:36 pm to BBONDS25
Whether it has taxpayer funds or not it still has to get through the Senate. Otherwise Iran is not going to sign it because they got burned so badly by Trump the last time they agreed to a deal with the USA.
Yes I believe the deal will contain taxpayer money (e.g., the ballroom / the wall will not cost the taxpayers anything)
Yes I believe the deal will contain taxpayer money (e.g., the ballroom / the wall will not cost the taxpayers anything)
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:40 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:Not if you believe, as you apparently do, that "Gulf States" relates to TX, LA, MS, AL, and FL.
Do you honestly believe there will be $0 in taxpayer funds in that $300B?
Of course, as has been explained many many many times, Gulf States in this instance refers to Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:41 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:It hasn't you effing imbecile!
the ballroom will not cost the taxpayers anything
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:44 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Gulf States in this instance refers to Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.
Do you honestly believe these countries, that hate Iran a lot more than we do, are going to cut $100B’s in checks to rebuild it? You can’t be that stupid
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:44 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:Of course posting this assumes
Otherwise Iran is not going to sign it because they got burned so badly by Trump the last time they agreed to a deal with the USA.
1) iran is negotiating from a position of strength and
2) Iran has the moral high ground when it comes to agreements with the US historically.
Which is exactly how a disingenuous TDS infected douche canoe would think.
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 6/15/26 at 4:45 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:
Do you honestly believe these countries, that hate Iran a lot more than we do, are going to cut $100B’s in checks to rebuild it? You can’t be that stupid
To ensure they can’t be wiped off the planet? Of course!
Stop calling people stupid when you don’t have a grasp of the basic facts. How stupid do you have to be to continually double down on your ignorance. You got fooled by a headline. Just admit it and move on. Stop being a dumb useful idiot.
Oh by the way. You liberals equate poor education to stupidity, right? There are several people in this thread far far more educated than you that you are calling stupid. Stop digging. You can’t be that stupid.
This post was edited on 6/15/26 at 4:49 pm
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News