- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The New York Times is mad pregnant Republicans wear clothes highlighting their pregnancy
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:02 pm
The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy
Usha responded
quote:
Usha Vance, along with Katie Miller and Karoline Leavitt, shows how much is said by an expectant silhouette, without anyone saying a word.
quote:
Last Sunday, in between trips to Europe to negotiate an Iran peace deal, Vice President JD Vance and his very pregnant wife, Usha, posted a Father’s Day Instagram Reel talking about how much they love reading to their kids and about the imminent arrival of their fourth child.
“Luckily, there’s going to be a new baby for you to read to,” the second lady says to her husband, “so you’re going to have many more years ahead of you.” She is wearing a stretchy coral dress that hugs her stomach, making what she is talking about very clear.
He grins and responds, “I was not yet ready to be out of the baby phase, so here we are, about to jump right in in just a few short weeks.”
As a promo for the first public pregnancy of a vice-presidential family since Ellen Colfax, the wife of Schuyler Colfax, in 1870, it doesn’t get any clearer than that. And it follows the equally public pregnancies of the Trump world figures Karoline Leavitt and Katie Miller. Leavitt, the White House press secretary, gave birth to her second child on May 1 (and has just returned from maternity leave). Katie Miller, the wife of Stephen Miller, a White House deputy chief of staff, had their fourth child on June 3.
That three such prominent women in the MAGA movement were pregnant at pretty much the same time was, indubitably, a coincidence. But for an administration that has such an intuitive and strategic understanding of the power of aesthetics that an unspoken dress code in which men outfit themselves in the image of the president has developed, it has also become a telling one.
Together, the women have created a notably consistent, and somewhat paradigm-shifting, picture of the White House’s family and fertility platform.
If the bare-chested, muscled mixed martial arts fighters of the U.F.C. match that President Trump hosted on Flag Day were the poster guys for MAGA’s image of masculinity, then the pregnant women of Trump world are one half of their feminine counterparts. Along with the sheath-clad, lip-filled, pageant-haired Mar-a-Lago set, they offer an image of idealized womanhood that gives literal shape to the pronatalist movement.
“It almost feels like a memo went out,” said Jill Filipovic, the host of the “Week in Women” podcast. “They have quite intentionally opted to present themselves as, ‘I am really pregnant, and this is what women were chosen to do,’ and they are happy to say that both with their looks and their mouths.”
If in doubt, simply consider posts on X and Instagram last month from Miller, who was then some nine months pregnant. “In honor of Mother’s Day,” she wrote, “a reminder that peak feminism is having babies. The most radical thing a woman can do is embrace her biological destiny.”
Along with her words came a portrait taken from the side, in which Miller is shown wearing low-slung, unbuttoned jeans and a black sports bra, her dark hair cascading in waves down her back. Like the stretchy and black knit Milly dress with a tulip on the front worn by Usha Vance for a military mothers celebration at the White House, and the form-fitting gowns worn by Leavitt and Miller to the White House Correspondents’ dinner in April, the photograph placed Miller’s rounded stomach front and center, enshrining her pregnancy for all to see.
It’s a notable change from the wardrobe choices of former political spouses like Cherie Blair, who surprised Britain when she became pregnant when her husband, Tony Blair, was prime minister. (Their son Leo was born in 2000.) Her maternity style consisted primarily of tunics and other loosefitting attire. Ditto Jacqueline Kennedy, who, when she was carrying a child during her husband’s 1960 presidential campaign, wore Empire-waist dresses and trapeze-like shapes that sufficiently skimmed her pregnant body to leave most of its reality to the imagination.
It’s also a change, said Helen Lewis, the author of “Difficult Women: A History of Feminism in 11 Fights,” from the wardrobes of professional women of yore, whose clothes were chosen largely to disguise their pregnancies, lest they be regarded as stumbling blocks to work. And though it mirrors much of modern style (and speaks to the body positivity movement), the look is also a departure from the tradwife aesthetic that has … well, burgeoned with the MAGA movement and features more smock-like and demure pregnancy clothes on its influencer moms.
Indeed, ever since Vance, Leavitt and Miller revealed their pregnancies, their public appearances have showcased their growing stomachs. There was Vance in April, deplaning on an official trip with her husband in Hungary in a body-hugging lilac sweater and a satin skirt, cradling her growing stomach; here she was later that month greeting King Charles III in another body-aware dress. There was Leavitt, at Christmas, in a stretchy knit dress, hand atop her belly; here was Miller at Trump’s party on New Year’s Eve at Mar-a-Lago in a bias-cut halter gown, arm also cupping her stomach.
Usha responded
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:08 pm to stout
NYT: "Women are mad they can't fat-shame the women they don't like"
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:13 pm to stout
Democrat party is just a bunch of middle school girls.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:32 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
NYT: "Women are mad they can't fat-shame the women they don't like"
NYT - We're just pissed we cant show a MTF tranny girl that's pregnant.
Everything they believe are lies.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:41 pm to stout
That is one of the most bizarre articles I have ever seen
Id expect it from huffpo or jezebelle but seems weird for the failed NYT
Id expect it from huffpo or jezebelle but seems weird for the failed NYT
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:44 pm to stout
“It almost feels like a memo went out,” said Jill Filipovic, the host of the “Week in Women” podcast. “They have quite intentionally opted to present themselves as, ‘I am really pregnant, and this is what women were chosen to do,’ and they are happy to say that both with their looks and their mouths.”
Jill Filipovic, 42, childless
Jill Filipovic, 42, childless
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:44 pm to stout
Lol. Damn, she even used a promo. That woman knows how to save her husband's money. Every woman should pay attention to that.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:51 pm to stout
Woman proud and excited to be pregnant. Who has ever heard of such a thing. How outrageous!!
These idiots let politics infect everything. Women being proud and excited to be pregnant has absolutely nothing to do with Dem or Republican and everything about being a human being. Maybe these idiots could try being a human being sometime. They just might find they like it.
These idiots let politics infect everything. Women being proud and excited to be pregnant has absolutely nothing to do with Dem or Republican and everything about being a human being. Maybe these idiots could try being a human being sometime. They just might find they like it.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:53 pm to stout
This is similar to toxic masculinity, they hate conservatives reproducing, so they find a reason to talk shite
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:58 pm to stout
Imagine the completely different tone a NYT article would carry if one of their beloved liberals , or liberal's wives got pregnant.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:59 pm to stout
What does the NYT have against birthing people?
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:12 pm to stout
I didn’t read this. I don’t care to but what I envision is the sad, cold reality creeping in to aging liberals that years dedicated to crowing about their enlightenment and justifying their alienation of family and traditional values has left them lonly, isolated and facing the realization that when the twilight of their days comes knocking, and they are yearning for a warm hand to hold theirs, no one will be there and their mark on this earth will pass without a tear shed.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:16 pm to stout
That article reeks of envy, insecurity, and bitterness.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:18 pm to stout
They hate it for a few different reasons. They're unhappy themselves. They've told themselves the feminist lie that it's actually more fulfilling to be childless. It's also a sign that they're literally being bred out by conservatives. While they're living lonely cat lady lives, we're happily having children and bringing them to church
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:34 pm to stout
That’s a great response by Usha politically
Not only does she not take the bait and get upset, she managed to appear like any normal person showing it was a simple 9 dollar dress not some over the top fashion statement that costs thousands of dollars
Not only does she not take the bait and get upset, she managed to appear like any normal person showing it was a simple 9 dollar dress not some over the top fashion statement that costs thousands of dollars
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:42 pm to stout
A classy looking pregnant lady is one of the nost beautiful things on earth.
Naturally, the left hates it.
Naturally, the left hates it.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 9:14 pm to Cosmo
quote:
That is one of the most bizarre articles I have ever seen
Indeed
What a weird angle to take
They will find anything to bitch about
Posted on 6/24/26 at 9:28 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
Woman proud and excited to be pregnant. Who has ever heard of such a thing. How outrageous!!
These idiots let politics infect everything. Women being proud and excited to be pregnant has absolutely nothing to do with Dem or Republican and everything about being a human being. Maybe these idiots could try being a human being sometime. They just might find they like it.
And they are also pissed that the dad's are successful people who are very much involved in the lives of their kids, are very happy, and perpetuate the nuclear family narrative.
Popular
Back to top

15











