Started By
Message

re: The New York Times is mad pregnant Republicans wear clothes highlighting their pregnancy

Posted on 6/25/26 at 10:51 am to
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21221 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 10:51 am to
It’s about time someone addressed this problem that has literally never crossed the mind of a single person who isn’t chronically aggrieved.
Posted by arktiger28
Member since Aug 2005
5457 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 11:11 am to
Imagine the fatal flaw of trying to propagate an ideology that, at its very center, disdains reproduction. If conservatives could solve the problem of higher education indoctrination, the future would belong to them, and it wouldn't even be close.
Posted by DVA Tailgater
Bunkie
Member since Jan 2011
3490 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 11:12 am to
Based Usha
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36486 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 12:36 pm to
"No, this has nothing to do with the fact there aren't pictures of a pregnant Michelle Obama!"
Posted by beachdude
FL
Member since Nov 2008
6567 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

as if…this is what women were chosen to do…


Well that and graduate summa cum laude from Yale with a BA in history, a masters in philosophy from Cambridge, law review at Yale Law School, clerk for two Supreme Court justices, and be a respected and successful attorney. By all accounts she is highly intelligent, a good mom, and obviously has a decent sense of humor. The Times is really sinking to heretofore unplumbed depths.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
158858 posts
Posted on 6/25/26 at 1:53 pm to
With that family background the NYT still finds her objective?

Or was this clearly labeled an opinion piece. I sure hope so.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram