Started By
Message

re: The deafening silence of the USA returning to the moon

Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:35 am to
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
25321 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:35 am to
Its not a DEMOCRAT thing.....thats why!
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10702 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Not to pick on you, because the Artemis launch was really cool.....gave me chills. But everyone here is so caught up in politics, that something non political like this isn't sexy. I may be wrong but you might be the first poster to bring it up.....anything about Artemis.


WTF are you doing sounding rational?
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2949 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:38 am to
as someone who remembers well the apollo program when those solid fuel boosters kicked in that rocket jumped of that launch pad like a scalded a*s ape. that's different it seemed like it took forever for the saturn 5 to clear the tower. they were at super sonic incredibly quick.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28586 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:40 am to
quote:

The deafening silence of the USA returning to the moon

In space, no one can hear you cheer.

I have seen very widespread coverage and interest in this. If you can’t see the interest and coverage, you are not looking.
Posted by RAB
Member since Aug 2019
1716 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:40 am to
NBC sent Al Roker to cover the launch. Is that not good enough for you?
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
13059 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:42 am to
Our education system deserves a great share of blame.

I doubt there is even the barest plurality of Americans under 60 (and certainly a infinitesimal tranche of illegals) that even know what the Apollo program was, when it existed, or what it accomplished…
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90762 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:46 am to
Posted by Cornpoptiger
Member since Oct 2018
841 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:50 am to
But did NASA really have humans on that rocket? I'm not buying the product. Even if they show a few people in a cockpit, where is exactly is the cockpit? Could that be in a studio tucked away somewhere deep in the NASA basement.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139003 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Well the first time doing something is a lot different than what, the 8th time doing it now? Yes, 50yr gap, but its been done.
What an interesting take. So how many times have "No Kings" protests been held?

We'll see how coverage proceeds. The Artemis TLI burn is scheduled for this evening. Once the TLI burn is complete, the crew will be farther from Earth than any humans since 1972. Trans-lunar injection is a very big deal, whether or not it's been done before. We'll see how it's reported.
Posted by laxtonto
Member since Mar 2011
2787 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:55 am to
Is it worth thinking considering that part of the apathy towards this is that Elon has make rocket launches to be perceived as “safe” and an everyday activity and so the launch of any system isn’t a monumentous occasion and instead the curiosity will begin as we reach closer to the moon?

As an example there were 35 total manned and unmanned Apollo missions and another 32 test launches between 1960-1972. Space X has had 177 launches in the last 12 months.
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 7:59 am
Posted by Sharlo
Van down by the river.
Member since Oct 2021
1633 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:57 am to
I wasn't too fired up about it, tbh. I know that in theory this trip is the start of a proof of concept or proving ground toward a future human-crewed Mars trip in the 2030s, but I think that's a little deceptive.

None of the known propulsion tech we have is capable of getting Artemis to Mars with a human crew. As I understand it, the trip would take almost a year, one-way, and the vessel can't haul enough supplies for the humans to survive even that first leg of the journey. So we are a long, long way and billions of dollars from a human mission to Mars.

I'm good with sending robots for continued exploration of Mars and beyond until propulsion tech catches up. Just think of what the robots will be able to do in 10 years.

But repeatedly going to the moon seems like a silly waste of money to me.

I'd rather them skip the moon selfies and lower my taxes. (I know, I know.)
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73674 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:58 am to
Did the media cover the Artemis launch?

Yes

Did they give the Artemis launch the same amount of coverage as the pointless “No Kings” demonstrations?

No. Not even close.

That should tell you all you need to know about our so-called “media.”
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
4213 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:02 am to
My entire family watched it yesterday.

Neither of the kids had one teacher bring it up, which I found very depressing.
Posted by SoFlaGuy
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Apr 2020
3213 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:07 am to
Should have named the shuttle, Nancy Guthrie.
Posted by BeepBopBoop
Northshore
Member since Dec 2023
1442 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:09 am to
My wife and 3 kids all watched the launch, I watch nearly all launches and get choked up every time. The achievement of man to space sitting on a rocket of fire is just too much for me.
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2949 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:20 am to
quote:

I'd rather them skip the moon selfies and lower my taxes. (I know, I know.)


since as your profile states you live in a van down by the river then like 63% of americans it isn't likely that you pay income taxes.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6786 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:21 am to
quote:

I was a little kid when man first went to the moon, but I can remember quite vividly how much news coverage was devoted to it well prior to, during, and afterward, as well as the subsequent return trips, and this with only three stations and a single newspaper to go on. The difference is quite remarkable, especially considering this is a precursor to a trip to Mars, and we are venturing further in space than man has ever been to.


I can understand the diff in coverage from the 60's to now.
1. Space travel was new and none of this had been done before
2. The country was in a cold war with USSR and the space race was front and center in the minds of Americans
3. Now, space travel is not new, there is no competition for space achievements

There is some excitement out there. My 6th grade daughter watched it and was interested. She had gone on a school trip to NASA and she enjoyed that. So her interest was peaked.

The excitement can never be replicated like it was in the 60's. But I will agree with your sentiment that a bigger deal needs to be made about it. Because of the complexity, no room for error, and danger that we all take for granted because we've seen so many launches of stuff. Just look at the success and failures of SpaceX and Blue Origin in trying ot do things differently.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72103 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:24 am to
It's because American exceptionalism is no longer applauded the way it should be. American's as a whole are no longer excited about America dragging it's big nuts across the rest of the world just because we can.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
55993 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:24 am to
quote:


It's like people just look for any reason to complain about things.


You're just now realizing that?
Posted by Enadious
formerly B5Lurker City of Central
Member since Aug 2004
18637 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Mars, is next.

There will never be a trip to Mars and back by humans. Humans aren't designed for space travel. Mars is too harsh an environment. The cost would be astronomical (no pun intended).
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram